| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| | |
Fix #1457: Three incompatbilities with scalac
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Scala2 does not conform to spec Section 2, where it says:
Bindings of different kinds have a precedence defined on them:
1. Definitions and declarations that are local, inherited, or made available by a package clause and also defined in the same compilation unit as the reference, have highest precedence.
2. Explicit imports have next highest precedence.
3. Wildcard imports have next highest precedence.
4. Definitions made available by a package clause, but not also defined in the same compilation unit as the reference, have lowest precedence.
In fact Scala 2, merges (1) and (4) into highest precedence.
This commit simulates the Scala2 behavior under -language:Scala2, but gives a migration
warning. For the naming-resolution test case we get:
dotc *.scala -language:Scala2 -migration
callsite.scala:9: migration warning: Name resolution will change.
currently selected : naming.resolution.Files
in the future, without -language:Scala2: java.nio.file.Files'
where Files is a type in package object package which is an alias of java.util.stream.Stream[java.nio.file.Path]
Files' is a class in package file
def gimmeFiles: Files = Files.list(Paths.get("."))
^
one warning found
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Two of these are unavoidable. I moved the tests to diabled/not-representable
and added in each case a comment to the main scala file detailing why there
is a deviation.
The last one (import-rewrite) is fixed.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fallback to .filter if a .withFilter is not available, but do this
only for .withFilter calls generated from for expressions (this is
different from what scalac does; the latter can also rewrite
.withFilter calls given in source, which is not desirable.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Passing tests from pending/pos go in pos. Some others
go in diabled/not-testable. These are tests that require
a compilation order which we cannot yet do with our unit
testing framework. Compiling them alltogether (as is now
doen in junit) does not work either for them because they
contain a duplicate class.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
- Delete redundant t2660 (exists elready in pos)
- Comment t1756
- Recategorize tryexpr
|
| |
|
|
| |
Allow hk type parameters to be higher kinded themselves.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Move some tests into proper slots + comments what they are.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Moved some working test to pos. I wonder why they were in pending? They did work for me.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
