From b25889b36dc433a0159e3c457c050bbeaa81fc5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dotty-bot
@@ -9541,9 +9541,9 @@ was created, otherwise
null
.
null
.
- sd:
+ sym:
- SingleDenotation
+ Symbol
)
@@ -9582,12 +9582,12 @@ was created, otherwise null
.
Textual representation of single denotation's declaration
+Textual representation of symbol's declaration
Textual representation of single denotation's declaration
+Textual representation of symbol's declaration
null
.
null
.
- sym:
+ sd:
- Symbol
+ SingleDenotation
)
@@ -9645,12 +9645,12 @@ was created, otherwise null
.
Textual representation of symbol's declaration
+Textual representation of single denotation's declaration
Textual representation of symbol's declaration
+Textual representation of single denotation's declaration
Textual representation of type
+Textual representation of denotation
Textual representation of type
+Textual representation of denotation
Textual representation of denotation
+Textual representation of tree
Textual representation of denotation
+Textual representation of tree
Textual representation of tree
+Textual representation of annotation
Textual representation of tree
+Textual representation of annotation
Textual representation of info relating to an import clause
+Textual representation of implicit search result
Textual representation of info relating to an import clause
+Textual representation of implicit search result
Textual representation, including symbol's kind e.g., "class Foo", "method Bar". -If hasMeaninglessName is true, uses the owner's name to disambiguate i...
+Textual representation of constant
Textual representation, including symbol's kind e.g., "class Foo", "method Bar". -If hasMeaninglessName is true, uses the owner's name to disambiguate identity.
+Textual representation of constant
Textual representation of constant
+The name as a text
Textual representation of constant
+The name as a text
Textual representation of implicit search result
+Textual representation of info relating to an import clause
Textual representation of implicit search result
+Textual representation of info relating to an import clause
The name as a text
+Textual representation, including symbol's kind e.g., "class Foo", "method Bar". +If hasMeaninglessName is true, uses the owner's name to disambiguate i...
The name as a text
+Textual representation, including symbol's kind e.g., "class Foo", "method Bar". +If hasMeaninglessName is true, uses the owner's name to disambiguate identity.
Textual representation of annotation
+Textual representation of type
Textual representation of annotation
+Textual representation of type
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set? -This means that both the kind flags and the carrier bits have non-empty inter...
+Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction? +Pre: The intersection of the typeflags of both sets must be non-empty.
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set? -This means that both the kind flags and the carrier bits have non-empty intersection.
+Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction? +Pre: The intersection of the typeflags of both sets must be non-empty.
Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction? -Pre: The intersection of the typeflags of both sets must be non-empty.
+and at the same time contain none of the flags in thebutNot
set?
+Pre: The intersect...
Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction?
+and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
Pre: The intersection of the typeflags of both sets must be non-empty.
Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction?
-and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
-Pre: The intersect...
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set,
+and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
Does this flag set have all of the flags in given flag conjunction?
-and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
-Pre: The intersection of the typeflags of both sets must be non-empty.
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set,
+and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set,
-and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set? +This means that both the kind flags and the carrier bits have non-empty inter...
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set,
-and at the same time contain none of the flags in the butNot
set?
Does this flag set have a non-empty intersection with the given flag set? +This means that both the kind flags and the carrier bits have non-empty intersection.
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
fs:
- FlagConjunction
+ FlagSet
+
+ ,
+
+
+
+ butNot:
+
+ FlagSet
)
@@ -12041,12 +12049,14 @@ in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
fs:
- FlagConjunction
-
- ,
-
-
-
- butNot:
-
FlagSet
@@ -12125,14 +12127,12 @@ in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
If this denotation does not exist, fallback to alternative
- +If this denotation does not exist, fallback to alternative
- +The summarized string representation of this showable element. +Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is +Config.summarizeDepth.
+The summarized string representation of this showable element. +Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is +Config.summarizeDepth.
+The summarized string representation of this showable element. -Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is -Config.summarizeDepth.
- +The summarized string representation of this showable element. -Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is -Config.summarizeDepth.
- +Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
fs:
- FlagConjunction
+ FlagSet
+
+ ,
+
+
+
+ butNot:
+
+ FlagSet
)
@@ -12736,12 +12744,14 @@ in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
+in butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
butNot
are set?
fs:
- FlagConjunction
-
- ,
-
-
-
- butNot:
-
FlagSet
@@ -12820,14 +12822,12 @@ in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
Has this denotation all of the flags in fs
set, whereas none of the flags
-in butNot
are set?
Has this denotation one of the flags in fs
set?
If this denotation does not exist, fallback to alternative
- +If this denotation does not exist, fallback to alternative
- +The summarized string representation of this showable element. +Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is +Config.summarizeDepth.
+The summarized string representation of this showable element. +Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is +Config.summarizeDepth.
+The summarized string representation of this showable element. -Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is -Config.summarizeDepth.
- +The summarized string representation of this showable element. -Recursion depth is limited to some smallish value. Default is -Config.summarizeDepth.
- +The type representing
-T[U1, ..., Un]
-where
- +The type representing
-T[U1, ..., Un]
-where
- +The type representing
+T[U1, ..., Un]
+where
+The type representing
+T[U1, ..., Un]
+where
+