From 63ba924a5ad9c01768be22f0b115c9501aa9f23a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Odersky Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:44:08 +0100 Subject: Cleanup of implicit modifiers scheme Implicit modifiers were quite irregular compared to the other ones. This commit does a cleanup. --- compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing/ModifiersParsingTest.scala | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing') diff --git a/compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing/ModifiersParsingTest.scala b/compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing/ModifiersParsingTest.scala index e31ef2160..32f842e92 100644 --- a/compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing/ModifiersParsingTest.scala +++ b/compiler/test/dotty/tools/dotc/parsing/ModifiersParsingTest.scala @@ -140,12 +140,12 @@ class ModifiersParsingTest { source = "def f(implicit a: Int, b: Int) = ???" println(source.defParam(0).modifiers) - assert(source.defParam(0).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit(Flags.Implicit))) - assert(source.defParam(1).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit(Flags.Implicit))) + assert(source.defParam(0).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit())) + assert(source.defParam(1).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit())) source = "def f(x: Int, y: Int)(implicit a: Int, b: Int) = ???" assert(source.defParam(0, 0).modifiers == List()) - assert(source.defParam(1, 0).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit(Flags.Implicit))) + assert(source.defParam(1, 0).modifiers == List(Mod.Implicit())) } @Test def blockDef = { -- cgit v1.2.3