| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| | |
Support tag driven publishing
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I started with:
https://github.com/scala/scala-swing/commit/a6a8e1d77e#diff-3acefdae08499733e855dd23e1af933dR8
And:
- modified the regex that derives the version from the tag to
handle the fact we have the scala binary version appended to
our tags
- Removed unnessary cross building with Scala 2.11 (as this is
on the 2.10.x branch)
- generated a key pair for the async repository
- added passphrase for that key, and sonatype credentials, to
sensitive.sbt
- encrypted the secrets with the travis key.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Make `f(await(completedFuture))` execute `f` synchronously
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
A worthy optimization, suggested by @danarmak.
Closes #73
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, as sequence of state transitions that did not pass through
an asynchrous boundary incurred stack frames. The trivial loop in
the enclosed test case would then overflow the stack.
This commit merges the `resume` and `apply(tr: Try[Any])` methods into
a `apply`. It changes the body of this method to be an infinite loop
with returns at the terminal points in the state machine (or at a
terminal failure.)
To allow merging of these previously separate matches, states that
contain an await are now allocated two state ids: one for the setup
code that calls `onComplete`, and one for the code in the continuation
that records the result and advances the state machine.
Fixes #93
|
|\
| |
| | |
Avoid assigning null to vars of derived value type
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`TreeGen#mkZero` returns `q"null"` for derived value classes.
```
scala> class V(val a: String) extends AnyVal
defined class V
scala> showRaw(gen.mkZero(typeOf[V]))
res0: String = Literal(Constant(null))
```
We use this API in async to generate the initial value for
ANF-lifted temporary variables.
However, this leads to NPEs, as after posterasure, we call the
unbox method on a null reference:
```
% cat sandbox/Macro.scala; scalac-hash v2.10.4 sandbox/Macro.scala; scala-hash v2.10.4 -e 'val x = Macros.myMacro'
import scala.reflect.macros.Context
import scala.language.experimental.macros
object Macros {
def macroImpl(c: Context): c.Expr[C] = {
import c.universe._
val e1 = c.Expr[C](Literal(Constant(null)).setType(typeOf[C]))
reify(e1.splice.asInstanceOf[C @annotation.unchecked.uncheckedVariance])
}
def myMacro: C = macro macroImpl
}
class C(val a: String) extends AnyVal
java.lang.NullPointerException
at Main$$anon$1.<init>(scalacmd4059893593754060829.scala:1)
at Main$.main(scalacmd4059893593754060829.scala:1)
at Main.main(scalacmd4059893593754060829.scala)
```
This commit installs a custom version of `mkZero` that instead
returns `q"new C[$..targs](${mkZero(wrappedType)})`.
Thanks to @ewiner for pinpointing the problem.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix regression around type skolems and if exprs.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we start with:
async({
val res = await[S[_$1 with String]](s);
if (true)
await[Int](0)
res
})
Typechecking the application (before macro expansion) yields
(where the trees are printed in the form `expr{tpe}`):
async[S[_$1#5738 with String#137]]({
val res: S[_$1#5490 with String] forSome { type _$1#5490 } =
await[S[_$1#5487 with String]](
s{S[_$1#5487 with String]}
){S[_$1#5487 with String]};
if (true)
await(0)
else
()
res{S[_$1#5738 with String]}
}{S[_$1#5738 with String]}){S[_$1#5738 with String]}
Note that the type of the second last line contains a skolemized
symbol `_$1#5738` of the existential `_$1#5490`. This is created
by this case in `Typer#adapt`:
case et @ ExistentialType(_, _) if ((mode & (EXPRmode | LHSmode)) == EXPRmode) =>
adapt(tree setType et.skolemizeExistential(context.owner, tree), mode, pt, original)
Our ANF rewrites part of this code to:
<synthetic> val await$1: S[_$1#5487 with String] = await[S[_$1#5487 with String]](awaitable$1);
val res: S[_$1#5490 with String] forSome { type _$1 } = await$1;
And later, the state machine transformation splits the last line into
a blank field and an assignment. Typechecking the `Assign` node
led to the an type error.
This commit manually attributes the types to the `Assign` node so
as to avoid these problem.
It also reigns in an overeager rewriting of `If` nodes in the
ANF transform, which was due to a bug in the label detection
logic introduced in 4fc5463538.
Thanks to @gnovark for yet another devilish test case and
analysis of the problem with label detection.
I worked on a more principled fix on:
https://github.com/retronym/async/compare/ticket/79-2?expand=1
in which I try to use `repackExistential` to convert skolemized
types to existentials for use as the types of synthetic vals
introduced by the ANF transform. This ran into a deeper problem
with existential subtyping in the compiler itself though.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fix asymptotic performance issues in live variables analysis.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix possibly-exponential runtime for DFS graph searches.
Improve DFA fixpoint algorithm to correctly compute worklist
of only changed nodes for each iteration.
Added test that takes > 2 minutes to compile without these
improvements.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
Avoid NotImplementedError awaiting a Future[Nothing]
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`gen.mkZero(NothingTpe)` gives the tree `Predef.???`. Instead, we should leave
the `await` field uninitialized with `ValDef(..., rhs = EmptyTree)`.
Fixes #66
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
[backport] Allow lazy vals without await in the initializer
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- remove unneeded `setType(NoType)`, which was leftover from my
first attempts to find this bug.
- fix typo in error message
- optimize imports
(cherry picked from commit 5c6ea29966fa80faae13892da50fc68ed1bf9ae7)
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were incorrectly typechecking the `ClassDef` of the state machine
in the macro in a way that discarded the resulting trees, and only
kept around the symbol.
The led to the the macro engine retypechecking
that node, which somehow led to duplicated lazy val initiaializer
`DefDef`-s in the template, which manifest as a `VerifyError`.
This commit:
- rescues the typechecked `ClassDef` node from the eager
typechecking by the macro
- loosens the restriction on lazy vals in async blocks. They are
still prohibited if they contain an await on the RHS
- Adds a test that shows evalution is indeed lazy.
(cherry picked from commit cc4587b1985519f7049d0feb0783d8e22c10f792)
Conflicts:
src/main/scala/scala/async/internal/AsyncAnalysis.scala
src/main/scala/scala/async/internal/AsyncTransform.scala
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Works on the 2.10.x branch, so just backprting the test.
Cherry picked from 6f6546ebfc26564843621e79d840209a5103d3c8.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Unhardcode use of scala.util.Try
|
|/
|
|
| |
In favour of the type defined by the active FutureSystem.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Update TODO comment about pres. compiler friendliness.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
Update copyright years.
|
|/
|
|
| |
2013 must have been unlucky.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Minor fixes in Async`s scaladoc.
|
|/ |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix line numbers for example in README
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Another take at the 2.10/2.11 spanning suppressMacroAttachment
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It was only working on the former.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix crashers in do/while and while(await(..))
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The new tree shapes handled for do/while look like:
// type checked
async({
val b = false;
doWhile$1(){
await(());
if (b)
doWhile$1()
else
()
};
()
})
We had to change ExprBuilder to create states for the if/else
that concludes the doWhile body, and also loosen the assertion
that the label jump must be the last thing we see.
We also have to look for more than just `containsAwait` when
deciding whether an `If` needs to be transformed into states;
it might also contain a jump to the enclosing label that is on
the other side of an `await`, and hence needs to be a state
transition instead.
|