From 92b0aaa09e4f6fa037189290acc3d59481cd4108 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jon Skeet Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:12:55 +0100 Subject: Use a nullable int for the memoizedSize, just because it's neater. --- csharp/ProtocolBuffers/AbstractMessage.cs | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/csharp/ProtocolBuffers/AbstractMessage.cs b/csharp/ProtocolBuffers/AbstractMessage.cs index 87172932..d8b9e9e6 100644 --- a/csharp/ProtocolBuffers/AbstractMessage.cs +++ b/csharp/ProtocolBuffers/AbstractMessage.cs @@ -26,12 +26,11 @@ namespace Google.ProtocolBuffers { public abstract class AbstractMessage : IMessage where TMessage : AbstractMessage where TBuilder : AbstractBuilder { - // TODO(jonskeet): Cleaner to use a Nullable? /// - /// The serialized size if it's already been computed, or -1 + /// The serialized size if it's already been computed, or null /// if we haven't computed it yet. /// - private int memoizedSize = -1; + private int? memoizedSize = null; #region Unimplemented members of IMessage public abstract MessageDescriptor DescriptorForType { get; } @@ -113,12 +112,11 @@ namespace Google.ProtocolBuffers { public virtual int SerializedSize { get { - int size = memoizedSize; - if (size != -1) { - return size; + if (memoizedSize != null) { + return memoizedSize.Value; } - size = 0; + int size = 0; foreach (KeyValuePair entry in AllFields) { FieldDescriptor field = entry.Key; if (field.IsRepeated) { -- cgit v1.2.3