| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first commit in the series. This commit only:
1) Splits Context into BlackboxContext and WhiteboxContext
2) Splits Macro into BlackboxMacro and WhiteboxMacro
3) Introduces the isBundle property in the macro impl binding
Here we just teach the compiler that macros can now be blackbox and whitebox,
without actually imposing any restrictions on blackbox macros. These
restrictions will come in subsequent commits.
For description and documentation of the blackbox/whitebox separation
see the official macro guide at the scaladoc website:
http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/macros/blackbox-whitebox.html
Some infrastructure work to make evolving macros easier:
compile partest-extras with quick so they can use latest library/reflect/...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The move is done to provide forward compatibility with 2.10.0.
The annotation isn't replaced with one of the macro-based solutions
right away (see comments for more information about those), because
we lack necessary tech in 2.10.x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Don't default the message, and show it exclusively.
- Fix cut-and-pasto in the @since tag
- Be tolerant if the annotaion class is missing, as seems to
have been the case compiling the continuations plugin.
- s/\t/ / in the test file to show the errors are positioned
correctly.
- Use defensive getOrElse
|
|
Motivated by the `.value` method in the SBT task-syntax branch,
which should only be called within the context of the argument
to a setting initialization macro.
The facility is akin to a fatal deprecation.
|