From 3cff2587d78eb6023ab1a584eba1bba8fd3660a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Phillips Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:41:23 -0700 Subject: Fix for SI-6283, no abstract value classes. The needless abstraction penalty was in full flower in Namers. I managed to find somewhere else to issue this error, where I can still just write an error message without tracking down an enumeration in a separate file and inventing an intermediate name for the enum member. --- test/files/neg/t6283.check | 4 ++++ test/files/neg/t6283.scala | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/files/neg/t6283.check create mode 100644 test/files/neg/t6283.scala (limited to 'test/files/neg') diff --git a/test/files/neg/t6283.check b/test/files/neg/t6283.check new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..69e417ee93 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/files/neg/t6283.check @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +t6283.scala:1: error: `abstract' modifier cannot be used with value classes +abstract class Funky(val i: Int) extends AnyVal + ^ +one error found diff --git a/test/files/neg/t6283.scala b/test/files/neg/t6283.scala new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d41eb18a74 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/files/neg/t6283.scala @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +abstract class Funky(val i: Int) extends AnyVal -- cgit v1.2.3