From adf50a3ac0c6861a77a781abc0814c5d17927175 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 19:23:00 +0100
Subject: evicts javac-artifacts.jar

Apparently, the usual _1, _2, _3... naming scheme also works for java
files, which need to be compiled together with partests. This allows us
to get rid of javac-artifacts.jar.
---
 .../JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java                   | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/files/run/reflection-java-annotations/JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java

(limited to 'test/files/run/reflection-java-annotations/JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java')

diff --git a/test/files/run/reflection-java-annotations/JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java b/test/files/run/reflection-java-annotations/JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..645eeb9399
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/reflection-java-annotations/JavaComplexAnnotation_1.java
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+import java.lang.annotation.Target;
+import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
+import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
+import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
+
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+@Target({ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
+public @interface JavaComplexAnnotation_1 {
+  byte v1();
+  short v2();
+  char v3();
+  int v4();
+  long v5();
+  float v6();
+  double v7();
+  boolean v8() default false;
+  // void v9();
+  String v10();
+  Class<?> v11();
+  JavaSimpleEnumeration_1 v12();
+  JavaSimpleAnnotation_1 v13();
+  byte[] v101();
+  short[] v102();
+  char[] v103();
+  int[] v104();
+  long[] v105();
+  float[] v106();
+  double[] v107();
+  boolean[] v108();
+  String[] v110();
+  Class<?>[] v111();
+  JavaSimpleEnumeration_1[] v112();
+  JavaSimpleAnnotation_1[] v113();
+}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.3