From 7a7f9927c3fd9919133d12619ce83ac2481848ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Rytz Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:59:57 +0200 Subject: SI-9393 fix modifiers of ClassBTypes for Java annotations The Scala classfile and java source parsers make Java annotation classes (which are actually interfaces at the classfile level) look like Scala annotation classes: - the INTERFACE / ABSTRACT flags are not added - scala.annotation.Annotation is added as superclass - scala.annotation.ClassfileAnnotation is added as interface This makes type-checking @Annot uniform, whether it is defined in Java or Scala. This is a hack that leads to various bugs (SI-9393, SI-9400). Instead the type-checking should be special-cased for Java annotations. This commit fixes SI-9393 and a part of SI-9400, but it's still easy to generate invalid classfiles. Restores the assertions that were disabled in #4621. I'd like to leave these assertions in: they are valuable and helped uncovering the issue being fixed here. A new flag JAVA_ANNOTATION is introduced for Java annotation ClassSymbols, similar to the existing ENUM flag. When building ClassBTypes for Java annotations, the flags, superclass and interfaces are recovered to represent the situation in the classfile. Cleans up and documents the flags space in the area of "late" and "anti" flags. The test for SI-9393 is extended to test both the classfile and the java source parser. --- test/junit/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/FlagsTest.scala | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/junit/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/FlagsTest.scala (limited to 'test/junit') diff --git a/test/junit/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/FlagsTest.scala b/test/junit/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/FlagsTest.scala new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fc0e8b0f6b --- /dev/null +++ b/test/junit/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/FlagsTest.scala @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +package scala.tools.nsc +package symtab + +import org.junit.Assert._ +import scala.tools.testing.AssertUtil._ +import org.junit.Test +import org.junit.runner.RunWith +import org.junit.runners.JUnit4 + +@RunWith(classOf[JUnit4]) +class FlagsTest { + object symbolTable extends SymbolTableForUnitTesting + import symbolTable._ + import Flags._ + + def sym = NoSymbol.newTermSymbol(nme.EMPTY) + + def withFlagMask[A](mask: Long)(body: => A): A = enteringPhase(new Phase(NoPhase) { + override def flagMask = mask + def name = "" + def run() = () + })(body) + + def testTimedFlag(flag: Long, test: Symbol => Boolean, enabling: Boolean) = { + assertEquals(withFlagMask(InitialFlags)(test(sym.setFlag(flag))), !enabling) + assertEquals(withFlagMask(InitialFlags | flag)(test(sym.setFlag(flag))), enabling) + } + + def testLate(flag: Long, test: Symbol => Boolean) = testTimedFlag(flag, test, enabling = true) + def testNot(flag: Long, test: Symbol => Boolean) = testTimedFlag(flag, test, enabling = false) + + @Test + def testTimedFlags(): Unit = { + testLate(lateDEFERRED, _.isDeferred) + testLate(lateFINAL, _.isFinal) + testLate(lateINTERFACE, _.isInterface) + testLate(lateMETHOD, _.isMethod) + testLate(lateMODULE, _.isModule) + testNot(PROTECTED | notPROTECTED, _.isProtected) + testNot(OVERRIDE | notOVERRIDE, _.isOverride) + testNot(PRIVATE | notPRIVATE, _.isPrivate) + + assertFalse(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(PRIVATE | notPRIVATE).isPrivate)) + + assertEquals(withFlagMask(InitialFlags)(sym.setFlag(PRIVATE | notPRIVATE).flags & PRIVATE), PRIVATE) + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(PRIVATE | notPRIVATE).flags & PRIVATE), 0) + } + + @Test + def normalLateOverlap(): Unit = { + // late flags are shifted by LateShift == 47. + // however, the first late flag is lateDEFERRED, which is DEFERRED << 47 == (1 << 4) << 47 == 1 << 51 + // the flags from 1 << 47 to 1 << 50 are not late flags. this is ensured by the LateFlags mask. + + for (i <- 0 to 3) { + val f = 1L << i + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(f << LateShift).flags & f), 0) // not treated as late flag + } + for (i <- 4 to 8) { + val f = 1L << i + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(f << LateShift).flags & f), f) // treated as late flag + } + } + + @Test + def normalAnti(): Unit = { + for (i <- 0 to 2) { + val f = 1L << i + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(f | (f << AntiShift)).flags & f), 0) // negated flags + } + for (i <- 3 to 7) { + val f = 1L << i + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(f | (f << AntiShift)).flags & f), f) // not negated + } + } + + @Test + def lateAntiCrossCheck(): Unit = { + val allButNegatable = AllFlags & ~(PROTECTED | OVERRIDE | PRIVATE) + val lateable = 0L | DEFERRED | FINAL | INTERFACE | METHOD | MODULE + val lateFlags = lateable << LateShift + val allButLateable = AllFlags & ~lateable + + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(AllFlags).flags), allButNegatable) + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(allButLateable).flags), allButNegatable) + + assertEquals(withFlagMask(AllFlags)(sym.setFlag(lateFlags).flags), lateFlags | lateable) + } +} -- cgit v1.2.3