From 9f16736bd90a3baeb6635c6f527798635bfd8dd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: patacongo Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:16:16 +0000 Subject: Documentation update git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@3717 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3 --- nuttx/TODO | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'nuttx/TODO') diff --git a/nuttx/TODO b/nuttx/TODO index 8faa88de6..48bf49e89 100644 --- a/nuttx/TODO +++ b/nuttx/TODO @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 13, 2011) +NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 16, 2011) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ nuttx/ @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ nuttx/ (3) ARM/STR71x (arch/arm/src/str71x/) (4) ARM/LM3S6918 (arch/arm/src/lm3s/) (4) ARM/STM32 (arch/arm/src/stm32/) + (3) AVR (arch/avr) (0) Intel x86 (arch/x86) (4) 8051 / MCS51 (arch/8051/) (2) Hitachi/Renesas SH-1 (arch/sh/src/sh1) @@ -878,6 +879,35 @@ o ARM/STM32 (arch/arm/src/stm32/) Priority: Low until someone needs DMA1, Channel 5 (ADC3, UART4_TX, TIM5_CH1, or TIM8_CH2). +o AVR (arch/avr) + ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + + Description: The serial console for the Micropendous3 AT90USB is configured for + 38400 BAUD. However, I get serial output at more or less exactly 4800 + BAUD (/8 less). From what I can see the setup looks correct but I don't + have a compatible AVR emulator to check things out in detail. I am + thinking that there is some fuse setting that divides the input clock + by 8??? but that is just a fantasy. + Status: Open + Priority: Low. Setting the terminal BAUD to 4800 solves the issues. However, + I suspect that this means that there are other lurking timing issues + as well. + + Description: There is a port for the Amber Web Server ATMega128, however this is + completely untested due to the lack to compatible, functional test + equipment. + Status: Open + Priority: The priority might as well be low since there is nothing I can do about + it anyway. + + Description: There is a OS test configuratin for the Micropendous AT90USB at + configs/micropendous3. However, as currently configured it will not + fit into the AT90USB memory. Some tuning and scaling is required and + obviously this configuration is untested. + Status: Open + Priority: Low for me because the AT90USB647 is not a very interesting target to + me because of its limited memory capability./ + o Intel x86 (arch/x86) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- cgit v1.2.3