| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
2013 must have been unlucky.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These are are at odds with the junit-interface SBT test framework
under SBT 0.13.+, and appear to be superfluous.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
If we intend to keep CPS fallback around for any length of time
it should probably move there too.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We need not, and should not, rename definitions
beyond the scope of the async transform, e.g.
in nested classes of function bodies.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid suprises in tree retyping, the instance of this
class is immediately upcase to
StateMachine[Promise[T], ExecContext].
Allow nested non-case classes. These pop up when
we use nested async calls.
Only look for duplicate names in the subtrees
traversed by AsyncTraverser.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Adapt the compiler's standard ResetAttrs to keep
This() nodes don't refer to a symbol defined in the
current async block.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a fly in the ointment: any This() trees in the provided
code are getting rebound to this class. Sounds like more
resetAttrs fun ahead.
The object also serves as the Future {} thunk.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Add tests where the result of an await is assigned to a variable external
to the async block.
- Clean up HygieneSpec.
|
| | |
|
|
|
Perhaps we should freshen them, but that will be a little awkward in our reify block.
|
