| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also mark the forwarder as Stable otherwise we get a RefChecks error.
This fixes #608.
Note that we do less parameter forwarding than scalac. See for example D
and Y in tests/run/paramForwarding.scala which don't get their own local
fields in scalac but do in dotty.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Both tests fail with the same error: "Cannot create object because
protected[this] newBuilder is not implemented". Not clear why partests
claim to succeed here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As the comment in the code says:
"In general, a bridge is needed when the signature of the closure method after
Erasure contains an ErasedValueType but the corresponding type in the functional
interface is not an ErasedValueType."
So we need to check if _at least one_ of the type needs to be adapted,
not if _all of them_ need to, the use of "forall" was an error.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Note that some of them may pass due to several bugs that interfere.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before this commit, the following code:
trait Hello {
println("Hello")
val x: Int = 1
println("World")
}
Became:
<trait> trait Hello extends Object {
def <init>(): Hello = {
{
()
}
this
}
<accessor> def x(): Int
protected def initial$x(): Int = {
println("Hello")
1
}
}
Notice that the initialization statements after the last getter were
missing, this is now fixed:
<trait> trait Hello extends Object {
def <init>(): Hello = {
{
println("World")
()
}
this
}
<accessor> def x(): Int
protected def initial$x(): Int = {
println("Hello")
1
}
}
|
| |
|
|
| |
also the top-level class
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Erasure#isUnbox was incorrect: the unbox methods are defined on the
value classes, not the boxed classes.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
