| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Add initial work for ScoverageModule
* style: Move package scoverage from lib to contrib
Suggested by @lefou
> I think, it would be better to add under `mill.contrib.scoverage`.
Pull request: #571
* Initial changes to non-hardcoded scoverage version
* Using task context api to specify dataDir
Now measurement data will be written to:
PROJECT_ROOT/out/MODULE/scoverage/data/
and the html report will be written to:
PROJECT_ROOT/out/MODULE/scoverage/data/htmlReport/
* Remove wild card imports in scoverage
Also remove scoverage dependency from build.sc
* Move htmlReport into worker
Based on what I've seen in
scalalib, scalajslib, scalanativelib, playlib, and twirllib modules.
Still need to add tests
* Add basic docs + tests for scoverage
I still am working on testing the actual generation of
reports.
* Use cross-module for scoverage worker
Now we can support multiple versions of scoverage
by adding them to the crossmodule list.
Also now running the local publish script succeeds.
* Add scoverage to ci tests
* Add detailed ScoverageModule documentation
* Test scoverage dataDir
* Remove <pre> tags in scaladoc
* Add scoverage dependency in less hacky way
* Modify scoverage tests to check classpaths
* Put docs in alphabetical order
* Test classpaths for scoverage runtime
* Remove abstract def test: ScoverageTests
* Construct classloader differently
* Revert "Construct classloader differently"
This reverts commit fccf9a94cc38fb9e2be58a9ff90b00b65f339db6.
* Revert "Construct classloader differently"
Also fixes unfound error in html report
This reverts commit fccf9a94cc38fb9e2be58a9ff90b00b65f339db6.
* Fix classpath for scoverage worker
|
