summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2008-10-17 17:54:22 +0000
committerpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2008-10-17 17:54:22 +0000
commitb2c100bd28b530bdb895ee592d2222209438e598 (patch)
tree941250d3dcba6b138c8a2178e330ae34ed0f2951
parent4e799e57a11f0398d1f3203a4c0deff8becf5264 (diff)
downloadnuttx-b2c100bd28b530bdb895ee592d2222209438e598.tar.gz
nuttx-b2c100bd28b530bdb895ee592d2222209438e598.tar.bz2
nuttx-b2c100bd28b530bdb895ee592d2222209438e598.zip
Add FAT test issue
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@1052 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
-rw-r--r--nuttx/TODO7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/TODO b/nuttx/TODO
index 6c36e3959..5f69108c9 100644
--- a/nuttx/TODO
+++ b/nuttx/TODO
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ o File system / Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
Status: Open
Priority: Low
- Description: FAT32: long file names
+ Description: FAT: long file names
Status: Open
Priority: Medium
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ o File system / Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
Priority: Low. I have mixed feelings about if NuttX should pay a
performance penalty for better data integrity.
+ Description: FAT: FAT32 is untested -- because I don't have any large
+ enough devices yet to support a FAT32 FS.
+ Status: Open
+ Priority: Medium
+
o Pascal Add-On (pcode/)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^