protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Update C# conformance failure list.	Feng Xiao	2017-03-29	1	-0/+4
\|
*	Update conformance failure lists.	Feng Xiao	2016-11-18	1	-6/+0
\|
*	Fix jenkins tests.	Feng Xiao	2016-11-15	1	-0/+4
\|
*	Update conformance test failure list	Jon Skeet	2016-11-03	1	-4/+0
\|
*	Fix bugs for csharp and ruby for internal integration.	Bo Yang	2016-10-10	1	-4/+6
\|
*	Add note about JSON tests maybe being wrong. (#1992)	Thomas Van Lenten	2016-08-23	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Add note about JSON tests maybe being wrong. - Add note about the JSON test maybe not being correct yet. - Add test to checks the generated names for double underscores to be sure they are what is expected.
*	Regenerate conformance files to include extra oneof fields.	Jon Skeet	2016-08-15	1	-20/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \|	This should fix the failures in the conformance tests - although it highlights the problem that we need to do this when changing the conformance.proto file...
*	Add more types to the zero oneof cases.	Thomas Van Lenten	2016-08-11	1	-0/+20
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Incase the different runtimes have different generation/implementations for for the different primitive field types, cover a larger range of the proto types in the oneof zero tests.
*	Amend the conformance tests to only use Int64/Uint64 non-wrapped values ↵	Jon Skeet	2016-07-31	1	-4/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	which (#1164) can reasonably be expected to be interoperable. (The fact that not all Int64/Uint64 values can be exactly represented in IEEE-754 and thus interoperably amongst JSON implementations is precisely the reason for wrapping them when we serialize... it shouldn't be a surprise that we can't round-trip in unwrapped form for all values.)
*	Fixed Python by updating failure lists and fixed a few broken tests.	Josh Haberman	2016-06-03	1	-5/+0
\| \| \| \| \|	Python 2.x doesn't detect unpaired surrogates so we have to do that manually.
*	Remove now-fixed conformance errors.	Jon Skeet	2016-01-15	1	-73/+0
\|
*	Conformance: Update C# failure list to reflect which tests currently pass.	Josh Haberman	2016-01-12	1	-89/+2
\|
*	Updated C#'s failure list, and added missing file.	Josh Haberman	2016-01-11	1	-0/+176
\|
*	Validate that after reading a message, we've consumed as many bytes as we ↵	Jon Skeet	2015-08-05	1	-22/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \|	expected to. We should now have no conformance failures.
*	Added C# conformance tests.	Jon Skeet	2015-08-05	1	-0/+22
	The tests are run from Travis in the same way as on other platforms. Currently some expected failures - but only expected in that they're what we got to start with. Will try to fix them in other pull requests.