| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is the manual code part of the Google.Protobuf library, and tests.
Some tests will fail until codegen is changed and rerun.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
* Changing DOTNET35 framework symbols in preprocessor directives to the default built-in value of NET35.
* Adding extension method StreamExtension.CopyTo for .NET 3.5 because it didn’t exist until .NET 4, and adding associated unit tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We explicitly don't do this when targeting .NET 3.5, where the
interface doesn't exist.
No implementation is required, as we're already implementing
everything we need for IList<T>.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Improve exception throwing implementation in collections
* Implement RepeatedField.AddRange.
This fixes issue #1730.
* Optimize AddRange for sequences implementing ICollection
(Also fix a few more C# 6-isms.)
* Remove the overload for Add(RepeatedField<T>)
We now just perform the optimization within AddRange itself.
This is a breaking change in terms of "drop in the DLL", but is
source compatible, which should be fine.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Previously we were incorrectly packing wrapper types.
This also refactors FieldCodec a bit as well, using more C# 6-ness.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This changes how we approach JSON formatting in general - instead of looking at the field a value came from, we just look at the type of the value. It's possible this *could* be slightly inefficient, but if we start caring about JSON performance deeply, we'll probably want to rewrite all of this anyway. It's definitely simpler this way.
When we support dynamic messages, we'll need to modify JsonFormatter to handle enum values, as they won't come be "real" .NET enums at that point. It shouldn't be hard to do though.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the future.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This requires .NET 4.5, and there are a few compatibility changes required around reflection.
Creating a PR from this to see how our CI systems handle it. Will want to add more documentation,
validation and probably tests before merging.
This is in aid of issue #590.
|
|
|
We'll see what I've missed when CI fails...
|
