aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FieldDescriptor.cs
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Tidy up reflection in advance of attempting to implement DynamicMessage.Jon Skeet2015-11-221-12/+21
| | | | | | | | | There are corner cases where MessageDescriptor.{ClrType,Parser} will return null, and these are now documented. However, normally they *should* be implemented, even for descriptors of for dynamic messages. Ditto FieldDescriptor.Accessor. We'll still need a fair amount of work to implement dynamic messages, but this change means that the public API will be remain intact. Additionally, this change starts making use of C# 6 features in the files that it touches. This is far from exhaustive, and later PRs will have more. Generated code changes coming in the next commit.
* Fix clearing wrapper type fields with reflection.Jon Skeet2015-10-301-1/+1
| | | | The nullable value type fields already worked, but the use of the CLR property concealed the difference between string and StringWrapper fields.
* Added documentation to generated code.Jon Skeet2015-09-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | There are now summaries for: - The Types nested class (which holds nested types) - The file descriptor class for each proto - The enum generated for each oneof (Also fixed two typos.) Generated code in next commit.
* Make FieldDescriptor.IsPacked work appropriately.Jon Skeet2015-08-081-3/+5
| | | | | This is a bit of a grotty hack, as we need to sort of fake proto2 field presence, but with only a proto3 version of the descriptor messages (a bit like oneof detection). Should be okay, but will need to be careful of this if we ever implement proto2.
* Document everything, and turn on errors if we fail to document anything in ↵Jon Skeet2015-08-041-5/+32
| | | | the future.
* First attempt at using profile 259 for Google.Protobuf.Jon Skeet2015-07-271-0/+1
| | | | | | | | This requires .NET 4.5, and there are a few compatibility changes required around reflection. Creating a PR from this to see how our CI systems handle it. Will want to add more documentation, validation and probably tests before merging. This is in aid of issue #590.
* Remove the usage of attributes for field/method discovery.Jon Skeet2015-07-221-13/+13
| | | | Instead, introduce GeneratedCodeInfo which passes in what we need, and adjust the codegen to take account of this.
* Revamp to reflection.Jon Skeet2015-07-211-0/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Changes in brief: 1. Descriptor is now the entry point for all reflection. 2. IReflectedMessage has gone; there's now a Descriptor property in IMessage, which is explicitly implemented (due to the static property). 3. FieldAccessorTable has gone away 4. IFieldAccessor and OneofFieldAccessor still exist; we *could* put the functionality straight into FieldDescriptor and OneofDescriptor... I'm unsure about that. 5. There's a temporary property MessageDescriptor.FieldAccessorsByFieldNumber to make the test changes small - we probably want this to go away 6. Discovery for delegates is now via attributes applied to properties and the Clear method of a oneof I'm happy with 1-3. 4 I'm unsure about - feedback welcome. 5 will go away 6 I'm unsure about, both in design and implementation. Should we have a ProtobufMessageAttribute too? Should we find all the relevant attributes in MessageDescriptor and pass them down, to avoid an O(N^2) scenario? Generated code changes coming in the next commit.
* First pass at the big rename from ProtocolBuffers to Google.Protobuf.Jon Skeet2015-07-171-0/+292
We'll see what I've missed when CI fails...