| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the ClassList support (maybe bring it back in the future).
Trim the includes to hopefully get a working Window build.
Add some more returns after switches for compilers that warn even when all values of the enum are handled.
Use ghtonl instead of htonl.
Change the use of [u]int(8,32)_t within the ObjC generator code to [u]int(8,32) to match the rest of the compiler.
Add objective-c generator files to Visual Studio project.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-add the objc prefix that got removed by accident.
Regenerate the generated descriptors (C++ and ObjC).
|
|\
| |
| | |
Merge protobuf C# into master (only C# proto2 is supported)
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
unittest_no_field_presence.proto instead.
This is the start of establishing a C# namespace of "Google.ProtocolBuffers.TestProtos.Proto3" for proto3-syntax protos.
We could optionally split the directory structure as well into Proto2 and Proto3 for clarity.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | | |
C# protocol buffers (initial pull request)
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
old codegen)
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
Change-Id: I23dee1c1d27b6440658680e9c273b6250213123c
|
|\ \ \ |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Change-Id: Iede1dc4e70427663e0d3c5304fa86b3aebf492b7
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Change-Id: I8f082ee3117ed873ab472a539867ff7cae58e8fd
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Change-Id: I66f216c70a19f44637090878d7e442d4d0f8991b
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix java compilation issues when processing large .proto files
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix issues 579 and 501 on the code.google.com issues list.
Specifically, large .proto files lead to too much static code, leading to a
compilation error from javac: "code too large". This divides the code used
in static initialization into multiple methods to avoid that error. Also,
this incorporates the fix in issue 501 on the code.google.com issues list
to call registry.add only once per extension.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Objective C compiler plugin and runtime
|
| | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Sync nanoproto from AOSP
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This is less ideal from a dex count perspective because it requires a
new variable for each message, and because most apps have proguard
rules that will ensure that CREATOR classes are retained.
However, it is required to be able to use nano protos inside of AIDL
files, as the autogenerated AIDL code fails to compile otherwise. This
is a substantial benefit as it allows for backwards-compatible
parameters and return types in AIDL methods along the lines of
safeparcel.
Bug: 19084705
Change-Id: I66a2c0424b96cf8ff6b631b186cc4f9407dfc1f4
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
It turns out dex (apparently) was inlining these protected final
methods from ExtendableMessageNano into every message class. Removing
these methods from the base class and inlining their code reduces
the method count by 2 methods / message when the store_unknown_fields
option is on.
Change-Id: I0aa09f2016d39939c4c8b8219601793b8fab301f
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
I wasn't able to get the clear() method to inline into the
constructor when optimizations are on in proguard. As a result,
every message has an extra superfluous kept method assuming the
app never uses clear() directly.
There are a couple of instances where setting this option false is
necessary in order to get code dexing successfully without hitting
the method limit, e.g. https://goto.google.com/tltzq
In this example, I tried turning on the method/inlining/unique and
method/inlining/short optimizations before resorting to adding the
generate_clear option, but the method count did not decrease. The
clear() methods were contributing over a thousand extra methods.
Change-Id: If6a9651d6a59cdf70b1040d8248779710ac73105
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
@IntDef is a support library annotation which allows build tools to
determine the valid set of values for a given integer field when that
field is intended to be restricted like an enum. This avoids the
overhead of enums while still allowing for compile-time type checking
in most circumstances.
Change-Id: Iee02e0b49a8e069f6456572f538e0a0d301fdfd5
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Upstreamed from Another Place (cr/57247854).
Change-Id: I2aaf59544c0f5ae21a51891d8a5eeda1dc722c90
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/67890/ removed field
initialization from the ctor, making it just call clear() instead.
When I added the generate_clear option back (as part of the reftypes
compat mode) in https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/109530/,
I forgot to ensure that what clear() used to do was inlined in the
constructor.
This change fixes NPEs that are happening for users of
reftypes_compat_mode who rely on unset repeated fields being empty
arrays rather than null.
Change-Id: Idb58746c60f4a4054b7ebb5c3b0e76b16ff88184
|
| | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Previously, extensions with field numbers greater than 268435455 would
result in a compile time error in generated code that looks something
like this:
Foo.java:3178: error: integer number too large: 3346754610
3346754610);
This is because we were trying to represent the tag number (an
unsigned int) using a java int constant, but java int constants are
signed, and can't exceed Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Fixed by declaring it as a long instead, and casting it down to an
int in the implementation. This is safe, because the tag value always
fits in 32 bis.
Change-Id: If2017bacb4e20af667eaeaf9b65ddc2c30a7709f
|
|/ / / / |
|