diff options
| author | Eugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com> | 2012-08-10 13:01:25 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Eugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com> | 2012-08-13 22:30:23 +0200 |
| commit | 37a290b02ef09c7e563239d878088aa30405eecb (patch) | |
| tree | 60276435304a47a46fee2f5bd7c4b015a34ab7a3 /pull-binary-libs.sh | |
| parent | 0e2080e8bf1c54cac59c5b0c53a93eb0de009d3b (diff) | |
| download | scala-37a290b02ef09c7e563239d878088aa30405eecb.tar.gz scala-37a290b02ef09c7e563239d878088aa30405eecb.tar.bz2 scala-37a290b02ef09c7e563239d878088aa30405eecb.zip | |
HIDDEN => ARTIFACT
This test is necessary in the API to tell apart useful synthetic symbols
(such as accessors) and low-level compilation artifacts (such as $outer).
However `isHidden` (as it's currently named in the compiler) is too generic.
Hence I renamed it along with the corresponding flag. Now the test says
`isArtifact` and the flag is named ARTIFACT.
Despite being an improvement over the first version, `isArtifact` is
still a bit unlucky. The name I like is `isImplementationArtifact`, but that's
a mouthful to be used in compiler hacking. Moreover, IMPLEMENTATION_ARTIFACT
looks weird.
For a discussion about related stuff see:
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/d04e762127737968
https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/1114
Diffstat (limited to 'pull-binary-libs.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions