summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/ant
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2013-12-01 09:56:36 +0100
committerMirco Dotta <mirco.dotta@typesafe.com>2013-12-02 10:37:52 +0100
commit652b3b4b9dcbf990e7ace409e050cc4ba4e83b16 (patch)
tree4851b110e443a7b2cc82e837177831eb738d7cb4 /test/ant
parentb7509c922f78624a9eba88c3c64054e0d217ecea (diff)
downloadscala-652b3b4b9dcbf990e7ace409e050cc4ba4e83b16.tar.gz
scala-652b3b4b9dcbf990e7ace409e050cc4ba4e83b16.tar.bz2
scala-652b3b4b9dcbf990e7ace409e050cc4ba4e83b16.zip
SI-7548 Test to demonstrate residual exploratory typing bug
We shouldn't observe tree types under silent mode. The enclosed test is a standalone version of `1 + BigInt(2)`, a standard example of exploratory typing in Scala. Once we determine that none of the `+` methods in `Int` accepts (possibly implicitly coerced `BigInt`), we have to backtrack and look for a view from `Int => { +(_: BigInt): ? }`. The next commit will correct the problem.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/ant')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions