diff options
| author | Martin Odersky <odersky@gmail.com> | 2012-09-20 18:22:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Grzegorz Kossakowski <grzegorz.kossakowski@gmail.com> | 2012-10-03 13:44:16 +0200 |
| commit | ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5 (patch) | |
| tree | e4cedab4789af1180a9be314d422d179f95e0c44 /test/files/neg/anytrait.check | |
| parent | e9edc69684b3d55a0aef16325e358036c71f4c57 (diff) | |
| download | scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.tar.gz scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.tar.bz2 scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.zip | |
Revised restrictions for value classes and unversal traits
and brought compiler in line with them. One thing we can accept IMO are nested
classes (nested objects are still a problem). In fact, it makes no sense to
exclude nested classes from value classes but not from universal traits. A class
nested in universal trait will becomes a class nested in a value class by
inheritance. Note that the reflection library already contains a universal trait
with a nested class (IndexedSeqLike), so we should accept them if we can.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/anytrait.check')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/files/neg/anytrait.check | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/anytrait.check b/test/files/neg/anytrait.check index 9dd970b58c..fabe74d379 100644 --- a/test/files/neg/anytrait.check +++ b/test/files/neg/anytrait.check @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -anytrait.scala:3: error: this statement is not allowed in universal trait extending from class Any: private[this] var x: Int = 1 +anytrait.scala:3: error: field definition is not allowed in universal trait extending from class Any var x = 1 ^ -anytrait.scala:5: error: this statement is not allowed in universal trait extending from class Any: T.this.x_=(T.this.x.+(1)) +anytrait.scala:5: error: this statement is not allowed in universal trait extending from class Any { x += 1 } ^ two errors found |