closes #3663.

namers wasn't setting privateWithin on java-defined variables (btw,    )
shouldn't clone carry over privateWithin? better treatment of linked   )
class access boundary (only check for access within linked class if it )
actually exists                                                        )

would have liked more control for the test case: only javac should
compile the java file, then scalac should compile the scala file and
fail

review by odersky

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/files/neg/t3663/PackageProtected.java b/test/files/neg/t3663/PackageProtected.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f4535a55b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/t3663/PackageProtected.java
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+package test;
+
+class PackageProtected {
+    int foo;
+}