summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 06:41:17 -0700
committerPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 09:24:04 -0700
commit96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c (patch)
treebd39f411275452bb5db2335da966ac8042cd504f /test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check
parent17b409b7832f541e3d52d2776c8ff3c47574ae0f (diff)
downloadscala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.gz
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.bz2
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.zip
Nailed down the "impossible match" logic.
I will again defer to a comment. /** Given classes A and B, can it be shown that nothing which is * an A will ever be a subclass of something which is a B? This * entails not only showing that !(A isSubClass B) but that the * same is true of all their subclasses. Restated for symmetry: * the same value cannot be a member of both A and B. * * 1) A must not be a subclass of B, nor B of A (the trivial check) * 2) One of A or B must be completely knowable (see isKnowable) * 3) Assuming A is knowable, the proposition is true if * !(A' isSubClass B) for all A', where A' is a subclass of A. * * Due to symmetry, the last condition applies as well in reverse. */
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check b/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dc7a8d93d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+unchecked-abstract.scala:16: error: abstract type H in type Con[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Con[H]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:21: error: abstract type H in type Con[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Con[H]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:27: error: abstract type T in type Inv[M.this.T] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[T]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:28: error: abstract type L in type Inv[M.this.L] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[L]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:31: error: abstract type H in type Inv[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[H]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:33: error: abstract type L in type Inv[M.this.L] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[L]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:36: error: abstract type H in type Inv[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[H]])
+ ^
+unchecked-abstract.scala:37: error: abstract type T in type Inv[M.this.T] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
+ /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[T]])
+ ^
+8 errors found