diff options
author | Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> | 2012-09-27 06:41:17 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> | 2012-09-27 09:24:04 -0700 |
commit | 96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c (patch) | |
tree | bd39f411275452bb5db2335da966ac8042cd504f /test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check | |
parent | 17b409b7832f541e3d52d2776c8ff3c47574ae0f (diff) | |
download | scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.gz scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.bz2 scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.zip |
Nailed down the "impossible match" logic.
I will again defer to a comment.
/** Given classes A and B, can it be shown that nothing which is
* an A will ever be a subclass of something which is a B? This
* entails not only showing that !(A isSubClass B) but that the
* same is true of all their subclasses. Restated for symmetry:
* the same value cannot be a member of both A and B.
*
* 1) A must not be a subclass of B, nor B of A (the trivial check)
* 2) One of A or B must be completely knowable (see isKnowable)
* 3) Assuming A is knowable, the proposition is true if
* !(A' isSubClass B) for all A', where A' is a subclass of A.
*
* Due to symmetry, the last condition applies as well in reverse.
*/
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check')
-rw-r--r-- | test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check b/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..dc7a8d93d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/files/neg/unchecked-abstract.check @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +unchecked-abstract.scala:16: error: abstract type H in type Con[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Con[H]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:21: error: abstract type H in type Con[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Con[H]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:27: error: abstract type T in type Inv[M.this.T] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[T]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:28: error: abstract type L in type Inv[M.this.L] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[L]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:31: error: abstract type H in type Inv[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[H]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:33: error: abstract type L in type Inv[M.this.L] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[L]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:36: error: abstract type H in type Inv[M.this.H] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[H]]) + ^ +unchecked-abstract.scala:37: error: abstract type T in type Inv[M.this.T] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure + /* warn */ println(x.isInstanceOf[Inv[T]]) + ^ +8 errors found |