diff options
author | Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> | 2014-02-06 14:12:18 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Phillips <paulp@improving.org> | 2014-02-06 15:16:47 -0800 |
commit | 51ec62a8c307cd66fe34fe07c85100d48b54aa8f (patch) | |
tree | d39c1fc16b175c1b0d93127a8ae06d8a80bbec7e /test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check | |
parent | f7870863c28d163d1016418783a1169fbd6022d0 (diff) | |
download | scala-51ec62a8c307cd66fe34fe07c85100d48b54aa8f.tar.gz scala-51ec62a8c307cd66fe34fe07c85100d48b54aa8f.tar.bz2 scala-51ec62a8c307cd66fe34fe07c85100d48b54aa8f.zip |
SI-6948 Make the Abstract* classes public.
Several weaknesses in the implementation converge and force multiply.
1) Type constructor inference is not persistent. During implicit search
it will give up after the first seen parent even if some deeper base type
(even another direct parent) would satisfy the search.
2) Type inference is not aware of access restrictions. Inferred types are
calculated with disregard for whether the inferred type is visible at
the point of inference. That means that package-private types - which may be
private for any number of good reasons, such as not wanting them to appear in
bytecode thus creating binary compatibility obligations - are not private.
There is no such thing as a qualified private type.
package p {
trait PublicInterface[T] { def foo(): Int }
private[p] trait ImplementationOnly[T] extends PublicInterface[T] { def foo(): Int = 1 }
class PublicClass extends ImplementationOnly[PublicClass]
}
package q {
object Test {
def f[A, CC[X]](xs: CC[A]): CC[A] = xs
def g = f(new p.PublicClass) // inferred type: p.ImplementationOnly[p.PublicClass]
def h = g.foo()
// Bytecode contains:
// public p.ImplementationOnly<p.PublicClass> g();
// public int h();
// 0: aload_0
// 1: invokevirtual #30 // Method g:()Lp/ImplementationOnly;
// 4: invokeinterface #33, 1 // InterfaceMethod p/ImplementationOnly.foo:()I
// 9: ireturn
}
}
3) The trait encoding leads to a proliferation of forwarder methods, so much so that
1.5 Mb of bytecode was taken off of the standard library size by creating abstract classes
which act as central mixin points so that leaf classes can inherit some methods the
old fashioned way rather than each receiving their own copy of every trait defined method.
This was done for 2.10 through the creation of the Abstract* classes, all of which were
given reduced visibility to keep them out of the API.
private[collection] class AbstractSeq extends ...
This achieved its intended goal very nicely, but also some unintended ones.
In combination with 1) above:
scala> val rand = new scala.util.Random()
rand: scala.util.Random = scala.util.Random@7f85a53b
// this works
scala> rand.shuffle(0 to 5)
res1: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(4, 0, 1, 2, 5, 3)
// and this doesn't! good luck reasoning that one out
scala> rand.shuffle(0 until 5)
<console>:9: error: Cannot construct a collection of type scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Int]
with elements of type Int based on a collection of type scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Int].
rand.shuffle(0 until 5)
^
// Somewhat comically, in scala 2.9 it was flipped: to failed (differently), until worked.
scala> scala.util.Random.shuffle(0 to 5)
<console>:8: error: type mismatch;
found : scala.collection.immutable.Range.Inclusive
required: ?CC[?T]
scala> scala.util.Random.shuffle(0 until 5)
res2: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(4, 3, 1, 2, 0)
In combination with 2) above:
scala> def f[A, CC[X]](xs: CC[A]): CC[A] = xs
f: [A, CC[X]](xs: CC[A])CC[A]
scala> var x = f(1 until 10)
x: scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Int] = Range(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
// It has inferred a type for our value which it will not allow us to use or even to reference.
scala> var y: scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Int] = x
<console>:10: error: class AbstractSeq in package collection cannot be accessed in package collection
var y: scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Int] = x
^
// This one is a straight regression - in scala 2.9,
scala> var x = f(1 until 10)
x: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Range(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Since 1) and 2) are essentially unfixable - at least by me - I propose
to ameliorate these regressions by attacking the symptoms at the leaves.
That means making all the Abstract* classes public - keeping in mind that
they must already be assumed to be in the binary compatibility footprint,
since they have been leaking throughout their existence. This only impacts
the inference of inaccessible collections types - it doesn't help with the
more serious issue with type inference.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check')
-rw-r--r-- | test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check | 56 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check b/test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5992ef02ad --- /dev/null +++ b/test/files/run/inferred-type-constructors.check @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +warning: there were 2 feature warning(s); re-run with -feature for details + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Set[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.m.Set[Int] + p.m.Seq[Int] + private[m] p.m.ASet[Int] + p.i.Seq[Int] + private[i] p.i.ASet[Int] + private[i] p.i.ASeq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Set[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Set[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Set[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.m.Set[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Set[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.Seq[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + private[p] p.ASet[Int] + private[p] p.AIterable[Int] + p.Iterable[Int] + p.i.Seq[Int] + private[p] p.AIterable[Int] + List[Nothing] + scala.collection.immutable.Vector[Nothing] + scala.collection.immutable.Iterable[(Int, Int)] + scala.collection.immutable.Set[Int] + Seq[Int] + Array[Int] + scala.collection.AbstractSet[Int] + Comparable[java.lang.String] + scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Int] + Iterable[Int] |