diff options
author | Adriaan Moors <adriaan.moors@epfl.ch> | 2012-06-04 15:35:35 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com> | 2012-06-08 15:35:09 +0200 |
commit | 6b3ef4f1676adcbe6dbdbf59a3bd359f339b0626 (patch) | |
tree | 44de8ceb19ff698d92c17bc37fcd6bbb84731ba1 /test/files/run/t0663.check | |
parent | 10292e4acbb8eb0143a5a087c750ed9699f31807 (diff) | |
download | scala-6b3ef4f1676adcbe6dbdbf59a3bd359f339b0626.tar.gz scala-6b3ef4f1676adcbe6dbdbf59a3bd359f339b0626.tar.bz2 scala-6b3ef4f1676adcbe6dbdbf59a3bd359f339b0626.zip |
turn unchecked type patterns into checked ones
the pattern `(_: T)` is made checkable using (ct: ClassTag[T]).unapply
by rewriting it to `ct(_: T)` (if there's a ClassTag[T] available)
similarly for extractors: if the formal type of the unapply method
is an uncheckable type, wrap in the corresponding classtag extractor (if available)
don't trigger rewrite on non-toplevel unchecked types
(i.e., only look at type constructor part of T when looking for unchecked types)
TODO: find outer match to figure out if we're supposed to be unchecked
would like to give users a chance to opt-out from the wrapping,
but finding the match to which this pattern belongs turned out to be tricky...
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/run/t0663.check')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions