summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRĂ¼diger Klaehn <rklaehn@gmail.com>2014-01-15 21:12:43 +0100
committerRĂ¼diger Klaehn <rklaehn@gmail.com>2014-01-15 21:12:43 +0100
commit47a91d76fc08dbac889f37915b7c08534bfa74a8 (patch)
treecb51e18fd452d16226cbbee10d5ab19c54f9f208 /test/files/run
parentafcfba02edf342ea020f8c45c3ef83168c45e5ae (diff)
downloadscala-47a91d76fc08dbac889f37915b7c08534bfa74a8.tar.gz
scala-47a91d76fc08dbac889f37915b7c08534bfa74a8.tar.bz2
scala-47a91d76fc08dbac889f37915b7c08534bfa74a8.zip
SI-6200 - HashMap should implement filter
This is the exact same algorithm as in SI-6196, with only slight differences due to the two type arguments of HashMap. Filter is tested by the new comparative collection test by @Ichoran, but there is nevertheless a small correctness test in t6200 in addition to tests of the new desirable behavior.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/run')
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t6200.scala68
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/run/t6200.scala b/test/files/run/t6200.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..02659c26bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/t6200.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+import scala.collection.immutable.HashMap
+
+object Test extends App {
+
+ case class Collision(value: Int) extends Ordered[Collision] {
+ def compare(that: Collision) = value compare that.value
+
+ override def hashCode = value / 5
+ }
+
+ def testCorrectness[T: Ordering](n: Int, mkKey: Int => T) {
+ val o = implicitly[Ordering[T]]
+ val s = HashMap.empty[T, Unit] ++ (0 until n).map(x => mkKey(x) ->())
+ for (i <- 0 until n) {
+ val ki = mkKey(i)
+ val a = s.filter(kv => o.lt(kv._1, ki))
+ val b = s.filterNot(kv => o.lt(kv._1, ki))
+ require(a.size == i && (0 until i).forall(i => a.contains(mkKey(i))))
+ require(b.size == n - i && (i until n).forall(i => b.contains(mkKey(i))))
+ }
+ }
+
+ // this tests the structural sharing of the new filter
+ // I could not come up with a simple test that tests structural sharing when only parts are reused, but
+ // at least this fails with the old and passes with the new implementation
+ def testSharing() {
+ val s = HashMap.empty[Int, Unit] ++ (0 until 100).map(_ ->())
+ require(s.filter(_ => true) eq s)
+ require(s.filterNot(_ => false) eq s)
+ }
+
+ // this tests that neither hashCode nor equals are called during filter
+ def testNoHashing() {
+ var hashCount = 0
+ var equalsCount = 0
+ case class HashCounter(value: Int) extends Ordered[HashCounter] {
+ def compare(that: HashCounter) = value compare that.value
+
+ override def hashCode = {
+ hashCount += 1
+ value
+ }
+
+ override def equals(that: Any) = {
+ equalsCount += 1
+ this match {
+ case HashCounter(value) => this.value == value
+ case _ => false
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ val s = HashMap.empty[HashCounter, Unit] ++ (0 until 100).map(k => HashCounter(k) ->())
+ val hashCount0 = hashCount
+ val equalsCount0 = equalsCount
+ val t = s.filter(_._1 < HashCounter(50))
+ require(hashCount == hashCount0)
+ require(equalsCount == equalsCount0)
+ }
+
+ // this tests correctness of filter and filterNot for integer keys
+ testCorrectness[Int](100, identity _)
+ // this tests correctness of filter and filterNot for keys with lots of collisions
+ // this is necessary because usually collisions are rare so the collision-related code is not thoroughly tested
+ testCorrectness[Collision](100, Collision.apply _)
+ testSharing()
+ testNoHashing()
+}