summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRĂ¼diger Klaehn <rklaehn@gmail.com>2014-01-15 21:12:23 +0100
committerRĂ¼diger Klaehn <rklaehn@gmail.com>2014-01-15 21:12:23 +0100
commitafcfba02edf342ea020f8c45c3ef83168c45e5ae (patch)
tree588827e627c0eed46c233f05ca6bc25ee7074757 /test/files/run
parent07e823ad9710734092c81fa7734e38bbd4fe2efa (diff)
downloadscala-afcfba02edf342ea020f8c45c3ef83168c45e5ae.tar.gz
scala-afcfba02edf342ea020f8c45c3ef83168c45e5ae.tar.bz2
scala-afcfba02edf342ea020f8c45c3ef83168c45e5ae.zip
SI-6196 - Set should implement filter
Implements a version of filter and filterNot that reuses as much as possible from the existing tree instead of building an entirely new one like the builder-based filter does. This results in significant performance improvements on average. Adds a test of basic correctness of filter and filterNot as well as of the desirable properties of the new filter implementation. This is a collaboration between me and @Ichoran
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/run')
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t6196.scala68
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/run/t6196.scala b/test/files/run/t6196.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..16c2c7409d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/t6196.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+import scala.collection.immutable.HashSet
+
+object Test extends App {
+
+ case class Collision(value: Int) extends Ordered[Collision] {
+ def compare(that:Collision) = value compare that.value
+
+ override def hashCode = value / 5
+ }
+
+ def testCorrectness[T : Ordering](n: Int, mkKey: Int => T) {
+ val o = implicitly[Ordering[T]]
+ val s = HashSet.empty[T] ++ (0 until n).map(mkKey)
+ for (i <- 0 until n) {
+ val ki = mkKey(i)
+ val a = s.filter(o.lt(_,ki))
+ val b = s.filterNot(o.lt(_,ki))
+ require(a.size == i && (0 until i).forall(i => a.contains(mkKey(i))))
+ require(b.size == n - i && (i until n).forall(i => b.contains(mkKey(i))))
+ }
+ }
+
+ // this tests the structural sharing of the new filter
+ // I could not come up with a simple test that tests structural sharing when only parts are reused, but
+ // at least this fails with the old and passes with the new implementation
+ def testSharing() {
+ val s = HashSet.empty[Int] ++ (0 until 100)
+ require(s.filter(_ => true) eq s)
+ require(s.filterNot(_ => false) eq s)
+ }
+
+ // this tests that neither hashCode nor equals are called during filter
+ def testNoHashing() {
+ var hashCount = 0
+ var equalsCount = 0
+ case class HashCounter(value:Int) extends Ordered[HashCounter] {
+ def compare(that:HashCounter) = value compare that.value
+
+ override def hashCode = {
+ hashCount += 1
+ value
+ }
+
+ override def equals(that:Any) = {
+ equalsCount += 1
+ this match {
+ case HashCounter(value) => this.value == value
+ case _ => false
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ val s = HashSet.empty[HashCounter] ++ (0 until 100).map(HashCounter)
+ val hashCount0 = hashCount
+ val equalsCount0 = equalsCount
+ val t = s.filter(_<HashCounter(50))
+ require(hashCount == hashCount0)
+ require(equalsCount == equalsCount0)
+ }
+
+ // this tests correctness of filter and filterNot for integer keys
+ testCorrectness[Int](100, identity _)
+ // this tests correctness of filter and filterNot for keys with lots of collisions
+ // this is necessary because usually collisions are rare so the collision-related code is not thoroughly tested
+ testCorrectness[Collision](100, Collision.apply _)
+ testSharing()
+ testNoHashing()
+}