summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/scaladoc/resources
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVlad Ureche <vlad.ureche@gmail.com>2012-02-05 22:00:49 +0100
committerPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-02-06 15:29:34 -0800
commit7ee4c018cefcf08f9c8812227c9a861614a30d9f (patch)
tree6c0d3985ce5ecbaae5e8927666d5fedd2f0678a1 /test/scaladoc/resources
parent93c2d93f4e7aaffaac92bdf14714a6c3871718c9 (diff)
downloadscala-7ee4c018cefcf08f9c8812227c9a861614a30d9f.tar.gz
scala-7ee4c018cefcf08f9c8812227c9a861614a30d9f.tar.bz2
scala-7ee4c018cefcf08f9c8812227c9a861614a30d9f.zip
Scaladoc @usecase annotation overriding / SI-5287
From now on, the usecases inherit the comments from their parents, such as the explanation and the annotations: @param, @tparam, @return, etc. An example of usecase comment inheritance is: /** * The test function tests the parameter param for ... * * @param theParam the implicit parameter to be tested for ... * @return the result of the test * * * * @usecase def test(): Bool * * The test function tests the parameter taken implicitly from scope. * Example: `test()` * * @return the result of the test for the current scope * * * * @usecase def test(theParam: SomeType): Bool * * This takes the explicit value passed. * Example: `test(3)` * * @param theParam the explicit parameter to be tested for ... */ def test(implicit theParam: SomeType): Bool Notice both usecases override the explanation with their own examples. The first usecase also overrides the "@return" annotation while the 2nd usecase overrides the "@param theParam" annotation. If they didn't override the explanations and annotations, they would inherit the values from the actual implementation, def test(implicit ...) This will be followed by @inheritdoc, which enables more fine-grained control over comment inheritance. The full explanation of using comment inheritance and @inheritdoc and their interaction with variables is given at https://wiki.scala-lang.org/display/SW/Tags+and+Annotations in the "Comment inheritance" and "Inheritance Example" sections.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/scaladoc/resources')
-rw-r--r--test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-override.scala41
-rw-r--r--test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-usecase.scala57
2 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-override.scala b/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-override.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..85b8e8d543
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-override.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// This tests the implicit comment inheritance capabilities of scaladoc for class inheritance (no $super, no @inheritdoc)
+class Base {
+ /**
+ * The base comment. And another sentence...
+ *
+ * @param arg1 The T term comment
+ * @param arg2 The string comment
+ * @tparam T the type of the first argument
+ * @return The return comment
+ */
+ def function[T](arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 0.0d
+}
+
+class DerivedA extends Base {
+ /**
+ * Overriding the comment, the params and returns comments should stay the same.
+ */
+ override def function[T](arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 1.0d
+}
+
+class DerivedB extends Base {
+ /**
+ * @param arg1 The overridden T term comment
+ * @param arg2 The overridden string comment
+ */
+ override def function[T](arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 2.0d
+}
+
+class DerivedC extends Base {
+ /**
+ * @return The overridden return comment
+ */
+ override def function[T](arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 3.0d
+}
+
+class DerivedD extends Base {
+ /**
+ * @tparam T The overriden type parameter comment
+ */
+ override def function[T](arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 3.0d
+} \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-usecase.scala b/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-usecase.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8dd1262e4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/scaladoc/resources/implicit-inheritance-usecase.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// This tests the implicit comment inheritance capabilities of scaladoc for usecases (no $super, no @inheritdoc)
+/** Testing use case inheritance */
+class UseCaseInheritance {
+ /**
+ * The base comment. And another sentence...
+ *
+ * @param arg1 The T term comment
+ * @param arg2 The string comment
+ * @tparam T The type parameter
+ * @return The return comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def missing_arg[T](arg1: T): Double
+ *
+ * @usecase def missing_targ(arg1: Int, arg2: String): Double
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_arg1[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @param arg1 The overridden T term comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_targ[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @tparam T The overridden type parameter comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_return[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @return The overridden return comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def added_arg[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String, arg3: Float): Double
+ * @param arg3 The added float comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_comment[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * The overridden comment.
+ */
+ def function[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 0.0d
+}
+
+/** Testing the override-use case interaction */
+class UseCaseOverrideInheritance extends UseCaseInheritance {
+ /**
+ * @usecase def missing_arg[T](arg1: T): Double
+ *
+ * @usecase def missing_targ(arg1: Int, arg2: String): Double
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_arg1[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @param arg1 The overridden T term comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_targ[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @tparam T The overridden type parameter comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_return[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * @return The overridden return comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def added_arg[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String, arg3: Float): Double
+ * @param arg3 The added float comment
+ *
+ * @usecase def overridden_comment[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double
+ * The overridden comment.
+ */
+ override def function[T](implicit arg1: T, arg2: String): Double = 0.0d
+}