summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2013-03-09 13:03:22 +0100
committerJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2013-03-09 23:05:52 +0100
commit7e52fb910b8547930f203233e46140a2daf8b511 (patch)
treedccdea4814193953de9cb92886586dede4a14b4b /test
parent2ff7650fb9f337dd123449e6cbcefc521cac8556 (diff)
downloadscala-7e52fb910b8547930f203233e46140a2daf8b511.tar.gz
scala-7e52fb910b8547930f203233e46140a2daf8b511.tar.bz2
scala-7e52fb910b8547930f203233e46140a2daf8b511.zip
SI-7226 Fix inference regression caused by TypeVar equality.
TypeVars, being mutable creatures, mustn't have structural equality/hashing, otherwise TypeRefs that differ only by having distinct TypeVars as components get wrongly uniqued together. The reported bug showed the disaterous consequences: constraints from the `C?[Int]` in the return type applied to the `?C[?A]` in the parameter list. This commit overrides `equals` and `hashCode` in `TypeVar` to use reference equality. An alternative fix would be to drop the `case`-ness of the class, as was the case before 0cde930b when this regressed.
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r--test/files/pos/t7226.scala26
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/pos/t7226.scala b/test/files/pos/t7226.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..06f0c95dc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/pos/t7226.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+trait HK {
+ type Rep[X]
+
+ // okay
+ def unzip2[A, B](ps: Rep[List[(A, B)]])
+ unzip2(null.asInstanceOf[Rep[List[(Int, String)]]])
+
+ // okay
+ def unzipHK[A, B, C[_]](ps: Rep[C[(A, B)]])
+ unzipHK(null.asInstanceOf[Rep[List[(Int, String)]]])
+
+ def unzipHKRet0[A, C[_]](ps: C[A]): C[Int]
+ def ls: List[String]
+ unzipHKRet0(ls)
+
+ // fail
+ def unzipHKRet[A, C[_]](ps: Rep[C[A]]): Rep[C[Int]]
+ def rls: Rep[List[String]]
+ unzipHKRet(rls)
+}
+
+trait HK1 {
+ type Rep[A]
+ def unzip1[A, B, C[_]](ps: Rep[C[(A, B)]]): (Rep[C[A]], Rep[C[B]])
+ def doUnzip1[A, B](ps: Rep[List[(A, B)]]) = unzip1(ps)
+}