summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.check11
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.flags1
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.scala13
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/t6227.check4
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/t6227.scala6
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/t900.check4
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/unit2anyref.check2
-rw-r--r--test/files/pos/t5667.scala2
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/richWrapperEquals.scala4
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t5356.check8
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t5356.scala6
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t6220.scala92
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t6261.scala130
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/t6292.scala18
14 files changed, 282 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.check b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.check
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..042fca867a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.check
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+implicit-shadow.scala:4: <i2s: error> is not a valid implicit value for Int(1) => ?{def isEmpty: ?} because:
+reference to i2s is ambiguous;
+it is imported twice in the same scope by
+import C._
+and import B._
+ 1.isEmpty
+ ^
+implicit-shadow.scala:4: error: value isEmpty is not a member of Int
+ 1.isEmpty
+ ^
+one error found
diff --git a/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.flags b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.flags
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..44842a9d65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.flags
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+-Xlog-implicits
diff --git a/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.scala b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ffd34b6408
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/implicit-shadow.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+object Test {
+ import B._, C._
+
+ 1.isEmpty
+}
+
+trait A {
+ implicit def i2s(i: Int): String = ""
+}
+
+object B extends A
+
+object C extends A \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/files/neg/t6227.check b/test/files/neg/t6227.check
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5e3c636712
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/t6227.check
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+t6227.scala:2: error: illegal combination of modifiers: implicit and case for: class IntOps
+ implicit case class IntOps( i: Int ) {
+ ^
+one error found
diff --git a/test/files/neg/t6227.scala b/test/files/neg/t6227.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..46416839d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/t6227.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+object Test {
+ implicit case class IntOps( i: Int ) {
+ def twice = i * 2
+ }
+}
+
diff --git a/test/files/neg/t900.check b/test/files/neg/t900.check
index 4611ceba8c..ff5304a135 100644
--- a/test/files/neg/t900.check
+++ b/test/files/neg/t900.check
@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
t900.scala:4: error: type mismatch;
found : Foo.this.x.type (with underlying type Foo.this.bar)
required: AnyRef
-Note that implicit conversions are not applicable because they are ambiguous:
- both method any2stringfmt in object Predef of type (x: Any)scala.runtime.StringFormat
- and method any2stringadd in object Predef of type (x: Any)scala.runtime.StringAdd
- are possible conversion functions from Foo.this.x.type to AnyRef
def break(): x.type
^
one error found
diff --git a/test/files/neg/unit2anyref.check b/test/files/neg/unit2anyref.check
index 10fe1861f5..6d11461700 100644
--- a/test/files/neg/unit2anyref.check
+++ b/test/files/neg/unit2anyref.check
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
unit2anyref.scala:2: error: type mismatch;
found : Unit
required: AnyRef
-Note: Unit is not implicitly converted to AnyRef. You can safely
-pattern match `x: AnyRef` or cast `x.asInstanceOf[AnyRef]` to do so.
val x: AnyRef = () // this should not succeed.
^
one error found
diff --git a/test/files/pos/t5667.scala b/test/files/pos/t5667.scala
index 513de5b663..353eec93d6 100644
--- a/test/files/pos/t5667.scala
+++ b/test/files/pos/t5667.scala
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
object Main {
implicit class C(val s: String) extends AnyVal
implicit class C2(val s: String) extends AnyRef
-
- implicit case class Foo(i: Int)
}
diff --git a/test/files/run/richWrapperEquals.scala b/test/files/run/richWrapperEquals.scala
index 44beb133b3..4a43617cde 100644
--- a/test/files/run/richWrapperEquals.scala
+++ b/test/files/run/richWrapperEquals.scala
@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
object Test {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
- assert(intWrapper(5) == 5)
- assert(5 == intWrapper(5))
assert(5 == (5: java.lang.Integer))
assert((5: java.lang.Integer) == 5)
- assert((5: java.lang.Integer) == intWrapper(5))
- assert(intWrapper(5) == (5: java.lang.Integer))
}
}
diff --git a/test/files/run/t5356.check b/test/files/run/t5356.check
index 21c4aef07b..7522e7ea74 100644
--- a/test/files/run/t5356.check
+++ b/test/files/run/t5356.check
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-1 scala.runtime.RichInt
-1 scala.runtime.RichInt
+1 java.lang.Integer
+1 java.lang.Integer
1 scala.math.BigInt
-1 scala.runtime.RichDouble
-1 scala.runtime.RichFloat
+1 java.lang.Double
+1 java.lang.Float
1
diff --git a/test/files/run/t5356.scala b/test/files/run/t5356.scala
index f7696c6088..ec17e036ad 100644
--- a/test/files/run/t5356.scala
+++ b/test/files/run/t5356.scala
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
object Test {
- def f(x: { def toInt: Int }) = println(x.toInt + " " + x.getClass.getName)
-
+ def f(x: Any { def toInt: Int }) = println(x.toInt + " " + x.getClass.getName)
+
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
f(1)
f(1.toInt)
f(BigInt(1))
f(1d)
f(1f)
- println((1: { def toInt: Int }).toInt)
+ println((1: (Any { def toInt: Int })).toInt)
}
}
diff --git a/test/files/run/t6220.scala b/test/files/run/t6220.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..834b692f43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/t6220.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+import scala.collection.immutable._
+
+object Test extends App {
+
+ // finds an int x such that improved(x) differs in the first bit to improved(0),
+ // which is the worst case for the HashTrieSet
+ def findWorstCaseInts() {
+ // copy of improve from HashSet
+ def improve(hcode: Int) = {
+ var h: Int = hcode + ~(hcode << 9)
+ h = h ^ (h >>> 14)
+ h = h + (h << 4)
+ h ^ (h >>> 10)
+ }
+
+ // find two hashes which have a large separation
+ val x = 0
+ var y = 1
+ val ix = improve(x)
+ while(y!=0 && improve(y)!=ix+(1<<31))
+ y+=1
+ printf("%s %s %x %x\n",x,y,improve(x), improve(y))
+ }
+ // this is not done every test run since it would slow down ant test.suite too much.
+ // findWorstCaseInts()
+
+ // two numbers that are immediately adiacent when fed through HashSet.improve
+ val h0 = 0
+ val h1 = 1270889724
+
+ // h is the hashcode, i is ignored for the hashcode but relevant for equality
+ case class Collision(h:Int, i:Int) {
+ override def hashCode = h
+ }
+ val a = Collision(h0,0)
+ val b = Collision(h0,1)
+ val c = Collision(h1,0)
+
+ // create a HashSetCollision1
+ val x = HashSet(a) + b
+ if(x.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashSetCollision1")
+ println("x should be a collision")
+ StructureTests.validate(x)
+ // StructureTests.printStructure(x)
+ require(x.size==2 && x.contains(a) && x.contains(b))
+
+ // go from a HashSetCollision1 to a HashTrieSet with maximum depth
+ val y = x + c
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashTrieSet")
+ println("y should be a HashTrieSet")
+ StructureTests.validate(y)
+ // StructureTests.printStructure(y)
+ require(y.size==3 && y.contains(a) && y.contains(b) && y.contains(c))
+
+ // go from a HashSet1 directly to a HashTrieSet with maximum depth
+ val z = HashSet(a) + c
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashTrieSet")
+ println("y should be a HashTrieSet")
+ StructureTests.validate(z)
+ // StructureTests.printStructure(z)
+ require(z.size == 2 && z.contains(a) && z.contains(c))
+}
+
+package scala.collection.immutable {
+ object StructureTests {
+ def printStructure(x:HashSet[_], prefix:String="") {
+ x match {
+ case m:HashSet.HashTrieSet[_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.size)
+ m.elems.foreach(child => printStructure(child, prefix + " "))
+ case m:HashSet.HashSetCollision1[_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.ks.size)
+ case m:HashSet.HashSet1[_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.head)
+ case _ =>
+ println(prefix+"empty")
+ }
+ }
+
+ def validate(x:HashSet[_]) {
+ x match {
+ case m:HashSet.HashTrieSet[_] =>
+ require(m.elems.size>1 || (m.elems.size==1 && m.elems(0).isInstanceOf[HashSet.HashTrieSet[_]]))
+ m.elems.foreach(validate _)
+ case m:HashSet.HashSetCollision1[_] =>
+ require(m.ks.size>1)
+ case m:HashSet.HashSet1[_] =>
+ case _ =>
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
diff --git a/test/files/run/t6261.scala b/test/files/run/t6261.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b4463256c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/t6261.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+import scala.collection.immutable._
+
+object Test extends App {
+
+ def test0() {
+ val m=ListMap(1->2,3->4)
+ if(m.tail ne m.tail)
+ println("ListMap.tail uses a builder, so it is not O(1)")
+ }
+
+ def test1() {
+ // test that a HashTrieMap with one leaf element is not created!
+ val x = HashMap.empty + (1->1) + (2->2)
+ if(x.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashTrieMap")
+ println("A hash map containing two non-colliding values should be a HashTrieMap")
+
+ val y = x - 1
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashMap1")
+ println("A hash map containing one element should always use HashMap1")
+ }
+
+ def test2() {
+ // class that always causes hash collisions
+ case class Collision(value:Int) { override def hashCode = 0 }
+
+ // create a set that should have a collison
+ val x = HashMap.empty + (Collision(0)->0) + (Collision(1) ->0)
+ if(x.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashMapCollision1")
+ println("HashMap of size >1 with collisions should use HashMapCollision")
+
+ // remove the collision again by removing all but one element
+ val y = x - Collision(0)
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashMap1")
+ println("HashMap of size 1 should use HashMap1" + y.getClass)
+ }
+ def test3() {
+ // finds an int x such that improved(x) differs in the first bit to improved(0),
+ // which is the worst case for the HashTrieSet
+ def findWorstCaseInts() {
+ // copy of improve from HashSet
+ def improve(hcode: Int) = {
+ var h: Int = hcode + ~(hcode << 9)
+ h = h ^ (h >>> 14)
+ h = h + (h << 4)
+ h ^ (h >>> 10)
+ }
+
+ // find two hashes which have a large separation
+ val x = 0
+ var y = 1
+ val ix = improve(x)
+ while(y!=0 && improve(y)!=ix+(1<<31))
+ y+=1
+ printf("%s %s %x %x\n",x,y,improve(x), improve(y))
+ }
+ // this is not done every test run since it would slow down ant test.suite too much.
+ // findWorstCaseInts()
+
+ // two numbers that are immediately adiacent when fed through HashSet.improve
+ val h0 = 0
+ val h1 = 1270889724
+
+ // h is the hashcode, i is ignored for the hashcode but relevant for equality
+ case class Collision(h:Int, i:Int) {
+ override def hashCode = h
+ }
+ val a = Collision(h0,0)->0
+ val b = Collision(h0,1)->0
+ val c = Collision(h1,0)->0
+
+ // create a HashSetCollision1
+ val x = HashMap(a) + b
+ if(x.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashMapCollision1")
+ println("x should be a HashMapCollision")
+ StructureTests.validate(x)
+ //StructureTests.printStructure(x)
+ require(x.size==2 && x.contains(a._1) && x.contains(b._1))
+
+ // go from a HashSetCollision1 to a HashTrieSet with maximum depth
+ val y = x + c
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashTrieMap")
+ println("y should be a HashTrieMap")
+ StructureTests.validate(y)
+ // StructureTests.printStructure(y)
+ require(y.size==3 && y.contains(a._1) && y.contains(b._1) && y.contains(c._1))
+
+ // go from a HashSet1 directly to a HashTrieSet with maximum depth
+ val z = HashMap(a) + c
+ if(y.getClass.getSimpleName != "HashTrieMap")
+ println("y should be a HashTrieMap")
+ StructureTests.validate(z)
+ // StructureTests.printStructure(z)
+ require(z.size == 2 && z.contains(a._1) && z.contains(c._1))
+ }
+ test0()
+ test1()
+ test2()
+ test3()
+}
+
+
+package scala.collection.immutable {
+ object StructureTests {
+ def printStructure(x:HashMap[_,_], prefix:String="") {
+ x match {
+ case m:HashMap.HashTrieMap[_,_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.size)
+ m.elems.foreach(child => printStructure(child, prefix + " "))
+ case m:HashMap.HashMapCollision1[_,_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.kvs.size)
+ case m:HashMap.HashMap1[_,_] =>
+ println(prefix+m.getClass.getSimpleName + " " + m.head)
+ case _ =>
+ println(prefix+"empty")
+ }
+ }
+
+ def validate(x:HashMap[_,_]) {
+ x match {
+ case m:HashMap.HashTrieMap[_,_] =>
+ require(m.elems.size>1 || (m.elems.size==1 && m.elems(0).isInstanceOf[HashMap.HashTrieMap[_,_]]))
+ m.elems.foreach(validate _)
+ case m:HashMap.HashMapCollision1[_,_] =>
+ require(m.kvs.size>1)
+ case m:HashMap.HashMap1[_,_] =>
+ case _ =>
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
diff --git a/test/files/run/t6292.scala b/test/files/run/t6292.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..51e31f95fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/t6292.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+ import scala.collection.mutable.DoubleLinkedList
+
+object Test {
+ def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
+ cloneAndtest(DoubleLinkedList[Int]())
+ cloneAndtest(DoubleLinkedList[Int](1))
+ cloneAndtest(DoubleLinkedList[Int](1,2,3,4))
+ }
+
+ def cloneAndtest(l: DoubleLinkedList[Int]): Unit =
+ testSame(l, l.clone.asInstanceOf[DoubleLinkedList[Int]])
+
+ def testSame(one: DoubleLinkedList[Int], two: DoubleLinkedList[Int]): Unit = {
+ def msg = s" for ${one} and ${two} !"
+ assert(one.size == two.size, s"Cloned sizes are not the same $msg!")
+ assert(one == two, s"Cloned lists are not equal $msg")
+ }
+}