| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| | |
SI-7779 Account for class name compactification in reflection
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We have to assume that the classes we are reflecting on were
compiled with the default value for -Xmax-classfile-name (255).
With this assumption, we can apply the same name compactification
as done in the regular compiler.
The REPL is particularly prone to generating long class names
with the '$iw' prefixes, so this is an important fix for runtime
reflection.
Also adds support for getting the runtime class of `O.type` if
`O` is a module.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Merge/2.10.2 to 2.10.x
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Moved an existing test from `pending` to `pos`. Not sure why
it was moved to `pending` in the first place.
Adds a new test distilled from building Scalaz with 2.10.3-RC1.
|
| |\ \
| | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Better late than never.
Conflicts:
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/typechecker/NamesDefaults.scala
|
| | |\
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7532 Fix regression in Java inner classfile reader
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
395e90a modified the detection of top-level classes in
ClassfileParser in two ways:
1. used `Name#containsChar` rather than `toString.indexOf ...` (good!)
2. decoded the name before doing this check (bad!)
That code is actually only run for non-Scala classfiles, whose
names don't need decoding. Attempting to do so converted `R$attr`
to `R@tr`, which no longer contains a '$', and was wrongly treated
as a top level class.
This commit reverts the use of `decodedName`, and inlines the method
to its only call site for clarity.
|
| | |\ \
| | | |/
| | |/| |
SI-7517 Fix higher kinded type inference regression
|
| | |/
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
- Discovered in 2.10.2-RC1
- Ostensibly regressed in 7e52fb910b, which conceptually reverted
part of 0cde930b so that (mutable) TypeVars don't use structural equality.
- But, does *not* fail if 7e52fb910b is cherry-picked directly after 0cde930b,
suggesting that it shone a light on a behaviour change in some other commit
in between the two.
- Indeed, the true regression came in https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/e5da30b843#L5L3176
- A targeted revert of e5da30b843 is undesirable, as we'd like SI-6846 to stay fixed
What's happening here? In the enclosed test case, higher kinded type
inference explores two possibilities:
Composed.this.Split[A]
K[[T]A[B[T]]] // `Split[A]` dealiased
The difference in the flow of type inference can be seen from the diff
below. Notice how now we no longer register `?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)`,
we instead only register `?K.addBound(K)`
```patch
--- sandbox/old.log 2013-05-30 00:27:34.000000000 +0200
+++ sandbox/new.log 2013-05-30 00:28:28.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,55 +1,114 @@
?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
- ?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)
?B.unifyFull(T)
?B.unifySpecific(T)
`-> false
?B.unifyFull(Any)
?B.unifySpecific(Any)
`-> false
`-> false
?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
- ?K.addBound(L)
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
`-> true
?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
- ?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)
?B.unifyFull(x)
?B.unifySpecific(x)
`-> false
`-> false
?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?B.unifyFull(T)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(T)
+ `-> false
+ ?B.unifyFull(Any)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(Any)
+ `-> false
+ `-> false
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?B.unifyFull(x)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(x)
+ `-> false
+ `-> false
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(L[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[A])
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(L[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[A])
+ ?K.addBound(L)
`-> true
```
|
| | |\
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7516 Revert "SI-7234 Make named args play nice w. depmet types"
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This reverts commit 83c9c764b528a7a1c1d39c480d22c8e3a71d5a58.
The tests are shunted to 'pending'.
Why revert this seemingly innocous commit? 83c9c764 generates a ValDef whose
tpt TypeTree has no original; this contains a reference to the symbol for `d`.
resetAttrs and the retypecheck assigns a new symbol for d and leaves a the
reference to the prior symbol dangling. The real bug is the resetAttrs concept.
|
| | |\ \
| | | |/
| | |/| |
SI-7486 Regressions in implicit search.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Revert e86832d7e8 and dd33e280e2.
|
| | |\ \
| | | |/
| | |/| |
SI-7509 Avoid crasher as erronous args flow through NamesDefaults
|
| | |/
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The fix for SI-7238 caused this regression.
This commit marks taints whole Apply with an ErrorType if it
has an erroneous argument, so as to stop a later crash trying
to further process the tree.
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
SI-942 A test case, five years adrift.
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I'm looking at the changes made in 47f35b587, which
prevented cyclic errors in class file parsing. That fix
is insufficient for, or otherwise complicit in, SI-7778, for
which I've enclosed a pending test.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-7716 Exclude patmat synthetics from bounds checking
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Consider this pattern match translation, that occurs *before* refchecks:
scala> val e: java.lang.Enum[_] = java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS
scala> e match { case x => x }
<console>:9: error: type arguments [_$1] do not conform to class Enum's type parameter bounds [E <: Enum[E]]
e match { case x => x }
^
[[syntax trees at end of refchecks]] // <console>
package $line5 {
case <synthetic> val x1: Enum[_$1] = $line3.$read.$iw.$iw.e;
case4(){
matchEnd3(x1)
};
matchEnd3(x: Enum[_$1]){
x
}
RefChecks turns a blind eye to the non-conformant type `Enum[_$1]` in
the label defs because of `65340ed4ad2e`. (Incidentally, that is far
too broad, as I've noted in SI-7756.)
This commit extends this exception to cover the synthetic ValDef `x1`.
Commit log watchers might notice the similarities to SI-7694.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7603 Fix thread safety of FlagTranslation
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We've fingered the true culprit in the previous commit.
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is outside of the Global cake, so we can't assume single
threaded access. A var was introduced in af3daf6fdb that can lead
to incorrect flag interpretation. The reported bug was triggered
in a multi-project SBT build. Java Annotations read from classfiles
were occasionally conferred the TRAIT|INFERFACE|ABSTRACT flag set,
leading to "@Foo is abstract, cannot be instatiated" later down the
line.
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
[nomaster] macro expansions are now auto-duplicated
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The fix still requires macro developers to be careful about sharing trees
by references, because attributed DefTrees will still bring trouble.
However this is an improvement, because it doesn't make matters worse
and automatically fixes situations similar to one in the test.
A much more thorough discussion with a number of open questions left:
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/492560d941b315cc
Was fixed ages ago in master in one of the paradise backports.
Never got to 2.10.x, but it's very useful, so I'm backporting it now.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7752 Don't disambiguate type parameters of overloaded alts
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
These are passed through from `InferencerContextErrors#applyErrorMsg`
to `withDisambiguation` as the `locals` parameter, which is promptly
ignored. This looks to be an unintended change in 39938bcc299.
Without this patch, the enclosed test case enters a pathalogical
disambiguation session, that not only flirts with unpleasant big-O
complexities, but also flails about appending "(in method foo)"
only to find that *all* occurences of the same-named type parameter
come from some method named "foo".
[snipping error message 40 seconds in the making]
method foo), O(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), P(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), Q(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), R(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), S(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), T, U(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo)(in method foo), V)
cannot be applied to (Int)
foo((1))
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7014 Annot arg may refer to annotated class's member
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This only reduces the crasher to a warning.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
[Rebase #2771] SI-7694 @uncheckedBounds, an opt-out from type bounds checking
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Followup to the previous commit that added the compiler support
for opting out of bounds checking.
With both pieces, we can test that the temporaries introduced
by the named/default arguments transform don't trigger bounds
violations.
|
| |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Synthetic defs introduced by transforms like named/default arguments,
ANF (in scala-async) often introduce a type tree (the tpt of the temporary)
that are based on the types of expressions. These types are scrutinized in
RefChecks to check that type parameter bounds are satisfied.
However, the type of the expression might be based on slack a LUB that
fails to capture constraints between type parameters.
This slackness is noted in `mergePrefixAndArgs`:
// Martin: I removed this, because incomplete. Not sure there is a
// good way to fix it. For the moment we just err on the conservative
// side, i.e. with a bound that is too high.
The synthesizer can now opt out of bounds by annotating the type as follows:
val temp: (<expr.tpe> @uncheckedBounds) = expr
This facility is now used in named/default arguments for the temporaries
used for the reciever and arguments.
The annotation is hidden under scala.reflect.internal, rather than in
the more prominent scala.annotation.unchecked, to reflect the intention
that it should only be used in tree transformers.
The library component of this change and test case will be included in the
next commit. Why split like this? It shows that the 2.10.3 compiler will
work with 2.10.2 scala-reflect.jar.
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | | |
SI-7020 Determinism for pattern matcher warnings
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Use LinkedHashSet for the DPLL algorithm for determistic
counter example generation.
Before, the test compiled with:
[info] v2.10.2 => /Users/jason/usr/scala-v2.10.2-0-g60d462e
test/files/neg/t7020.scala:3: warning: match may not be exhaustive.
It would fail on the following inputs: List((x: Int forSome x not in (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7))), List(_, _)
List(5) match {
^
test/files/neg/t7020.scala:10: warning: match may not be exhaustive.
It would fail on the following inputs: List((x: Int forSome x not in (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7))), List(_, _)
List(5) match {
^
test/files/neg/t7020.scala:17: warning: match may not be exhaustive.
It would fail on the following inputs: List((x: Int forSome x not in (1, 2, 4, 6, 7)), _), List(1, _), List(2, _), List(4, _), List(5, _), List(6, _), List(7, _), List(??, _)
List(5) match {
^
test/files/neg/t7020.scala:24: warning: match may not be exhaustive.
It would fail on the following input: List(_, _)
List(5) match {
^
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | | |
SI-7733 reflective packages now more consistent with scalac
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Previously PackageScopes from scala.reflect ignored all classes that
had $'s in non-rightmost positions in their names.
Unfortunately this behaviour is inconsistent with how scalac does things,
and I reconciled this as usual, by pulling corresponding logic into
scala-reflect.jar and sharing it between runtime reflection and compiler.
This change has seprate pull requests for 2.10.x and 2.11.0. The latter
deprecates `scala.tools.nsc.util.ClassPath.isTraitImplementation`
whereas the former (which you're looking at right now) does not, because
we can't deprecated members in minor releases.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
showRaw now prints symbols of def trees
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
A very useful addition that came in handy when hacking macro annotations
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
currentRun.compiles now correctly works in toolboxes
|
| | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | | |
Another random bug uncovered and extinguished when hacking macro annots.
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | | |
[nomaster] macro errors now always have positions
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Back then when I implemented macros for inclusion in trunk (Spring 2012),
partest didn't support the _1, _2, ... convention for neg tests, so I had
to use toolboxes to test macro-generated exceptions.
Unfortunately toolboxes aren't very good with positions (mostly because
their inputs are almost always constructed without corresponding sources)
so I didn't notice that errors signalizing about macro-generated
exceptions actually don't carry positions with them because of a typo.
This patch fixes the oversight, but it doesn't need to be ported to master,
because over there everything's already fixed by one of the backports
from macro paradise.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-7331 tb.parse returns unpositioned trees
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This commit gets rid off code wrapping that was previously used by
toolbox to get into correct parsing mode. Instead combination of
templateStats/accept(EOF) is used. This is the same solution as the one
used in repl and built-in scriptRunner
This pull request doesn't attempt to generalize this approach in any
way and re-use it all over the place due to the caution of possible
accidental compatibility breakage. I plan to do it separately against
master.
Additionally there are a few more changes that make importers be aware
of positions and a test for that (via @jedesah).
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-4907 SI-4615 scala.bat now honors -J and -D options.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This makes scala.bat parse and use -J and -D arguments.
Specifically:
- Parameters starting with -J are stripped of the prefix, unquoted if
necessary and appended to %JAVA_OPTS% or default values.
- Parameters starting with -D are unquoted if necessary and then
appended to the others. The right-hand side of a property can be
quoted or not.
- All of those are given to `java` before any other parameters.
- The above only happens on parameter preceding the first parameter
that does not start with "-" (usually a class name).
- The exact arguments passed to scala.bat are also given as-is to
the scala launcher (including -J and -D arguments).
set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx512m
scala -J-Xmx128m -Dprop1=42 -Dprop2="hello world" "-Dprop3=bar"
"-J-Xms64m" Test foo
will result in
java -Xmx512m -Xmx128m -Dprop1=42 -Dprop2="hello world" -Dprop3=bar
-Xms64m [cp, scala main] -J-Xmx128m -Dprop1=42 -Dprop2="hello world"
"-Dprop3=bar" "-J-Xms64m" Test foo
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Assorted toolbox fixes
|
| |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Apparently there are still discrepancies between how the vanilla compiler
turns class files into symbols and how the reflective compiler does it.
Working on bringing these guys in sync, one bug at a time.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Rename t7636-neg.check to the standard t7636.check.
|
|/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Not sure which partest bug allowed this, but the old name was wrong.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-7455 Drop dummy param for synthetic access constructor
|