| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The underlying bug is tracked as https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/304
and blocks our SBT starting on JDK 9.
This commit avoids using the empty package in our build definition.
After this change, I needed to manually clean the class files from the
build definition as follows, which might indicate a bug in SBT.
$ sbt ...
/Users/jz/code/scala-java9-ci/build.sbt:0: warning: imported `BuildSettings' is permanently hidden by definition of object BuildSettings
import ..., _root_.scala.build.BuildSettings, ...
^C
% rm -rf project/target/scala-2.10/sbt-0.13/classes/
% sbt # okay second time
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is not enough to check the return value of `process()` to determine
whether a class file should be kept or deleted. The classes that should
not be kept are only known after processing everything and files that
have already been written to disk may need to be deleted.
|
|
|
Reusing parts of #4593, this commits adds two additional subprojects to
the sbt build:
- repl-jline, which is already used by the ant build, builds the part of
the REPL that depends on JLine. The actual JLine depenency is moved to
this project.
- repl-jline-shaded uses JarJar to create a shaded version of repl-jline
and jline.jar.
Unlike the ant build, this setup does not use any circular dependencies.
dist/mkBin puts all of quick/repl, quick/repl-jline and
quick/repl-jline-shaded onto the classpath of build-sbt/quick/bin/scala.
A future addition to the sbt build for building build-sbt/pack will have
to put the generated classfiles into the correct JARs, mirroring the old
structure.
|
