summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/project/build.properties
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* upgrade to sbt 0.13.13Seth Tisue2016-10-281-1/+1
|
* Bump sbt.version to 0.13.12, without breakingDale Wijnand2016-09-221-1/+1
|
* upgrade to sbt 0.13.11Seth Tisue2016-02-221-1/+1
| | | | yum! delicious dogfood!
* upgrade sbt from 0.13.7 to 0.13.9Seth Tisue2015-09-141-1/+1
| | | | because why not, the sbt build is experimental anyway
* Introduce sbt buildGrzegorz Kossakowski2015-04-171-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It mimics the ant build as closely as necessary to compare the produced artifacts between the two builds, to build confidence in the transition: - all projects are built into the same directories in build/quick - include legacy projects: forkjoin, asm, actors - TODO: Include forkjoin & asm into library & compiler jars, respectively. We don't carry over ant's built-in bootstrapping process; this will be scripted outside of the build, publishing layers locally. NOTE: the root project cannot be named `scala`: it shadows the `scala` package in e.g., `projectConsole`.
* Deleted the sbt 0.7 project.Paul Phillips2011-12-081-11/+0
| | | | | Pretty sure nobody's using this? Let's make some space for our upcoming friend the 0.11 project.
* Confusingly, I am restoring the method "getArch...Paul Phillips2011-05-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Confusingly, I am restoring the method "getArchive" which has been gone from trunk since February 2010 but is suddenly necessary for the sbt build (as its "compiler-interface" won't compile without it.) I am sure it all makes perfect sense. No review.
* Securing some of the blessings of whitespace fo...Paul Phillips2011-01-271-2/+2
| | | | | | Securing some of the blessings of whitespace for the sbt build. No review.
* Updated copyright notices to 2011Antonio Cunei2011-01-201-1/+1
|
* First version of SBT build for Scala compiler/l...moix2010-07-291-0/+11
First version of SBT build for Scala compiler/library (see README)