| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| | |
SI-8417 Check adapts of each param section
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously, adaptations like auto-tupling were checked
only on the last param section of an application.
This commit runs the sanity check always.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Gaze deeper for errors before committing to conversion
of assignment to update. The error buried in the transformed
tree escapes notice of retypechecking and leaks to backend.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
Types in the applicable overload alternatives need to be seen from
the respective owners of the individual alternative, not from the
target’s owner (which can be a subtype of the types that define the
methods).
|
| |\
| |
| | |
SI-10066 Fix crash in erroneous code with implicits, dynamic
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The compiler support in the typechecker for `scala.Dynamic` is
very particular about the `Context` in which it is typechecked.
It looks at the `tree` in the enclosing context to find the expression
immediately enclosing the dynamic selection. See the logic in
`dyna::mkInvoke` for the details.
This commit substitutes the result of `resetAttrs` into the tree
of the typer context before continuing with typechecking.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
merge/2.11.x-to-2.12.x-20161220
Conflicts:
bincompat-backward.whitelist.conf
build.xml
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/typechecker/Typers.scala
src/library/scala/collection/immutable/NumericRange.scala
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If rewriting `x += y` fails to typecheck, emit error messages
for both the original tree and the assignment.
If rewrite is not attempted because `x` is a val, then say so.
The error message at `tree.pos` is updated with the additional advice.
SI-8763 Crash in update conversion
When there are already errors, don't attempt mechanical rewrites.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
VarHandles bring a host of new "polymorphic signature" methods to
the Java 9 standard library. This commit updates the way we detect
such methods to look at the absense/presense of the
`PolymorphicSignature` annotation, so as to include these (and any
future additions.)
When we see applications of such methods, we disable adaptation
of argument and return types.
Tested manually with JDK9-ea:
```
Welcome to Scala 2.12.2-20161208-165912-3de1c0c (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 9-ea).
Type in expressions for evaluation. Or try :help.
scala> import java.lang.invoke._, scala.runtime.IntRef
import java.lang.invoke._
import scala.runtime.IntRef
scala> val varHandle = MethodHandles.lookup().in(classOf[IntRef]).findVarHandle(classOf[IntRef], "elem", classOf[Int]);
varHandle: java.lang.invoke.VarHandle = java.lang.invoke.VarHandleInts$FieldInstanceReadWrite@7112ce6
scala> varHandle.getAndSet(ref, 1): Int
res5: Int = 0
scala> varHandle.getAndSet(ref, 1): Int
res6: Int = 1
```
Inspecting bytecode shows the absense of box/unboxing:
```
object Test {
import java.lang.invoke._, scala.runtime.IntRef
val varHandle = MethodHandles.lookup().in(classOf[IntRef]).findVarHandle(classOf[IntRef], "elem", classOf[Int]);
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
val i : Int = varHandle.getAndSet(IntRef.zero, 1)
}
}
```
```
public void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokevirtual #28 // Method varHandle:()Ljava/lang/invoke/VarHandle;
4: invokestatic #34 // Method scala/runtime/IntRef.zero:()Lscala/runtime/IntRef;
7: iconst_1
8: invokevirtual #40 // Method java/lang/invoke/VarHandle.getAndSet:(Lscala/runtime/IntRef;I)I
11: istore_2
12: return
```
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-10075 propagate annotations to lazy val's underlying field
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This likely regressed in #5294.
Review feedback from retronym:
- Tie annotation triaging a bit closer together
durban kindly provided initial version of test/files/run/t10075.scala
And pointed out you must force `lazy val`, since `null`-valued field
is serializable regardless of its type.
Test test/files/run/t10075b courtesy of retronym
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-7046 reflection doesn't see all knownDirectSubclasses
This appears to do the right thing in the most typical scenarios in which `knownDirectSubclasses` would be used. The missing 5% is that subclasses defined in local scopes might not be seen by `knownDirectSubclasses` (see `Local` and `Riddle` in the test below). In mitigation, though, it is almost certain that a local subclass would represent an error in any scenario where `knownDirectSubclasses` might be used.
Errors for such situations are reported by recording (via a symbol attachment) that `knownDirectSubclasses` has been called and reporting an error if any additional children are added subsequently.
Despite these limitations and caveats, I believe that this represents a huge improvement over the status quo, and would eliminate 100% of the failures that I've seen in practice with people using shapeless for type class derivation.
|
| | | |_|/
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | | |
Clean up of code guarded by bare -Xexperimental
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Some places in the compiler, and many places in macros, use
`untypecheck` (aka `resetAttrs`) to strip types and local symbols
from a tree before retypechecking it under some different context.
The refactoring of the desugaring of vals and vars in Scala 2.12.0
broke an assumption in this facility.
When a ValDef must be split into multiple members (e.g. a field and
a getter, or a perhaps also a setter), the ValDef that was parsed
assumes the role of the `field`, and the trees for other members are
stached by `Namer` to the `synthetics` map of the compilation unit,
in order to spliced into the right statement list by typechecking.
See `enterGetterSetter` for more details.
However, the parsed ValDef is now used verbatim, carrying the meaning
(ie, the symbol) of the `private[this]` field. This tree now had
an inconsistency between the flags in `tree.mods.flags` and
`tree.symbol.flags`. `tree.name` also differed from `tree.symbol.name`
(the latter was renamed to be a local name, ie one with a trailing space.)
When `ResetAttrs` stripped off the symbol and we retypechecked, we'd
end up with two symbols in scope with the same name.
In the first from the `run` test:
```
================================================================================
{
class a extends scala.AnyRef {
def <init>(): a = {
a.super.<init>();
()
};
private[this] val x: Int = 42;
<stable> <accessor> def x: Int = a.this.x
};
new a()
}
{
class a extends scala.AnyRef {
def <init>() = {
super.<init>();
()
};
val x = 42; // oops, the name is "x" rather than "x " and we've missing `private[this]`!
<stable> <accessor> def x: Int = a.this.x
};
new a()
}
scala.tools.reflect.ToolBoxError: reflective typecheck has failed: x is already defined as value x
```
This commit uses the flags and name of the symbol in `typedValDef`.
I've also had to modify the internals of `CodePrinter` to use the
implicit, override, and deferred flags from the modifiers of an
accessor when recovering pre-typer tree for a ValDef.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Tweak the "should I synthesize now" test for
case modules, so that the tree is inserted in
the same tree as the case class.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The paradigm is `def add(x: X): Unit = listBuffer += x`.
The value that is discarded is not new information.
Also cleans up the recent tweaks to help messaging.
Adds newlines in case they ask for multiple helps.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fixes to mixin forwarders
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If a call super[T].m resolves to a method A.m where A is a class, but
not the direct superclass of the current class, there is no way to
emit an invocation of A.m: `invokespecial A.m` will resolve to B.m
where B is the superclass of the current class.
This commit adds an error message in this case.
Note that this is similar to an existing error message for qualified
super calls to a non-direct superclass:
class A { def m = 1 }
class B extends A { override def m = 2 }
class C extends B { override def m = super[A].m }
Gives "error: A does not name a parent class of class C".
If the user means to call method m in the superclass, he can write an
unqualified `super.m`.
An similar error message is introduced if A is a Java-defined interface
(and m is a default method), and A is not a direct parent of the current
class. In this case `invokespecial A.m` is invalid bytecode. The
solution is to add A as a direct parent of the current class.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
They remain ValDefs until then.
- remove lazy accessor logic
now that we have a single ValDef for lazy vals,
with the underlying machinery being hidden until the fields phase
leave a `@deprecated def lazyAccessor` for scala-refactoring
- don't skolemize in purely synthetic getters,
but *do* skolemize in lazy accessor during typers
Lazy accessors have arbitrary user code, so have to skolemize.
We exempt the purely synthetic accessors (`isSyntheticAccessor`)
for strict vals, and lazy accessors emitted by the fields phase
to avoid spurious type mismatches due to issues with existentials
(That bug is tracked as https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165)
When we're past typer, lazy accessors are synthetic,
but before they are user-defined to make this hack less hacky,
we could rework our flag usage to allow for
requiring both the ACCESSOR and the SYNTHETIC bits
to identify synthetic accessors and trigger the exemption.
see also https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165
ok 7 - pos/existentials-harmful.scala
ok 8 - pos/t2435.scala
ok 9 - pos/existentials.scala
previous attempt: skolemize type of val inside the private[this] val
because its type is only observed from inside the
accessor methods (inside the method scope its existentials are skolemized)
- bean accessors have regular method types, not nullary method types
- must re-infer type for param accessor
some weirdness with scoping of param accessor vals and defs?
- tailcalls detect lazy vals, which are defdefs after fields
- can inline constant lazy val from trait
- don't mix in fields etc for an overridden lazy val
- need try-lift in lazy vals: the assign is not seen in uncurry
because fields does the transform (see run/t2333.scala)
- ensure field members end up final in bytecode
- implicit class companion method: annot filter in completer
- update check: previous error message was tangled up with unrelated
field definitions (`var s` and `val s_scope`),
now it behaves consistently whether those are val/vars or defs
- analyzer plugin check update seems benign, but no way to know...
- error message gen: there is no underlying symbol for a deferred var
look for missing getter/setter instead
- avoid retypechecking valdefs while duplicating for specialize
see pos/spec-private
- Scaladoc uniformly looks to field/accessor symbol
- test updates to innerClassAttribute by Lukas
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
only exclude FunctionN types themselves from SAM, don't exclude their
subtypes; we want e.g.
trait T extends Function1[String, String]
(x => x) : T
to compile
reference: https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/206
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-9847 Nuance pure expr statement warning
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Clarify the current warning, which means that an expression
split over multiple lines may not be parsed as naively expected.
When typing a block, attempt minor nuance. For instance, a
single expression is not in need of parens. Try to avoid
duplicate warnings for expressions that were adapted away
from result position.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Propagate overloaded function type to expected arg type
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Infer missing parameter types for function literals passed
to higher-order overloaded methods by deriving the
expected argument type from the function types in the
overloaded method type's argument types.
This eases the pain caused by methods becoming overloaded
because SAM types and function types are compatible,
which used to disable parameter type inference because
for overload resolution arguments are typed without
expected type, while typedFunction needs the expected
type to infer missing parameter types for function literals.
It also aligns us with dotty. The special case for
function literals seems reasonable, as it has precedent,
and it just enables the special case in typing function
literals (derive the param types from the expected type).
Since this does change type inference, you can opt out
using the Scala 2.11 source level.
Fix scala/scala-dev#157
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
[Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>: remove obsolete comments and fix tests]
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-8339 remove deprecated rewrite of withFilter -> filter
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
You must implement the `withFilter` method to use
`if`-guards in a `for`-comprehension.
(Drop pos/t7239.scala because it relied on this rewrite.)
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Introducing: the fields phase [ci: last-only]
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Derive/filter/propagate annotations in info transformer,
don't rely on having type checked the derived trees in order
to see the annotations.
Use synthetics mechanism for bean accessors -- the others
will soon follow.
Propagate inferred tpt from valdef to accessors
by setting type in right spot of synthetic tree
during the info completer.
No need to add trees in derivedTrees, and get rid of
some overfactoring in method synthesis, now that we have
joined symbol and tree creation.
Preserve symbol order because tests are sensitive to it.
Drop warning on potentially discarded annotations,
I don't think this warrants a warning.
Motivated by breaking the scala-js compiler, which relied
on annotations appearing when trees are type checked.
Now that ordering constraint is gone in the new encoding,
we may as well finally fix annotation assignment.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
There's no other place to squirrel away the annotation
until we create a field in a subclass.
The test documents the idea, but does not capture the
regression seen in the wild, as explained in a comment.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Remove weird special cases for private-local fields
and parameter accessor (fields).
One change with the new trait val encoding:
```
scala> trait T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
<console>:11: error: method x is defined twice;
the conflicting variable x was defined at line 11:37
trait T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
^
```
Whereas:
```
scala> class T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
defined class T
```
Before, both the `class` and `trait` definition were accepted.
(Because there is no accessor for a private[this] val/var,
and a MethodType does not match the type of a value.)
(Dotty accepts neither the class or the trait definition.)
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
One step towards teasing apart the mixin phase, making
each phase that adds members to traits responsible for
mixing in those members into subclasses of said traits.
Another design tenet is to not emit symbols or trees
only to later remove them. Therefore, we model a
val in a trait as its accessor. The underlying field
is an implementation detail. It must be mixed into
subclasses, but has no business in a trait (an interface).
Also trying to reduce tree creation by changing less in subtrees
during tree transforms.
A lot of nice fixes fall out from this rework:
- Correct bridges and more precise generic signatures for
mixed in accessors, since they are now created before erasure.
- Correct enclosing method attribute for classes nested in trait fields.
Trait fields are now created as MethodSymbol (no longer TermSymbol).
This symbol shows up in the `originalOwner` chain of a class declared
within the field initializer. This promoted the field getter to
being the enclosing method of the nested class, which it is not
(the EnclosingMethod attribute is a source-level property).
- Signature inference is now more similar between vals and defs
- No more field for constant-typed vals, or mixed in accessors
for subclasses. A constant val can be fully implemented in a trait.
TODO:
- give same treatment to trait lazy vals (only accessors, no fields)
- remove support for presuper vals in traits
(they don't have the right init semantics in traits anyway)
- lambdalift should emit accessors for captured vals in traits,
not a field
Assorted notes from the full git history before squashing below.
Unit-typed vals: don't suppress field
it affects the memory model -- even a write of unit to a field is relevant...
unit-typed lazy vals should never receive a field
this need was unmasked by test/files/run/t7843-jsr223-service.scala,
which no longer printed the output expected from the `0 to 10 foreach`
Use getter.referenced to track traitsetter
reify's toolbox compiler changes the name of the trait
that owns the accessor between fields and constructors (`$` suffix),
so that the trait setter cannot be found when doing mkAssign in constructors
this could be solved by creating the mkAssign tree immediately during fields
anyway, first experiment: use `referenced` now that fields runs closer
to the constructors phase (I tried this before and something broke)
Infer result type for `val`s, like we do for `def`s
The lack of result type inference caused pos/t6780 to fail
in the new field encoding for traits, as there is no separate accessor,
and method synthesis computes the type signature based on the ValDef tree.
This caused a cyclic error in implicit search, because now the
implicit val's result type was not inferred from the super member,
and inferring it from the RHS would cause implicit search to consider
the member in question, so that a cycle is detected and type checking fails...
Regardless of the new encoding, we should consistently infer result types
for `def`s and `val`s.
Removed test/files/run/t4287inferredMethodTypes.scala and test/files/presentation/t4287c,
since they were relying on inferring argument types from "overridden" constructors
in a test for range positions of default arguments. Constructors don't override,
so that was a mis-feature of -Yinfer-argument-types.
Had to slightly refactor test/files/presentation/doc, as it was relying
on scalac inferring a big intersection type to approximate the anonymous
class that's instantiated for `override lazy val analyzer`.
Now that we infer `Global` as the expected type based on the overridden val,
we make `getComment` private in navigating between good old Skylla and Charybdis.
I'm not sure why we need this restriction for anonymous classes though;
only structural calls are restricted in the way that we're trying to avoid.
The old behavior is maintained nder -Xsource:2.11.
Tests:
- test/files/{pos,neg}/val_infer.scala
- test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_match.scala
- test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_struct.scala
need NMT when inferring sig for accessor
Q: why are we calling valDefSig and not methodSig?
A: traits use defs for vals, but still use valDefSig...
keep accessor and field info in synch
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
For backwards compatiblity with 2.11, we already
don't adapt a zero-arg method value to a SAM.
In 2.13, we won't do any eta-expansion for zero-arg method values,
but we should deprecate first.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* Hook into java parser to generate doc comments
* Generate empty trees for java implementation bodies
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-8667 Improve too-many-args message
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Pick the first excessive positional arg for the caret.
Note that erroring on named args doesn't do the obvious thing
in this regard.
If `k` was removed from the signature, then `f(k=1, i=2, j=3)`
doesn't tell us much about the wrong arg, because naming takes
the `k=1` as an assignment, `i` as duplicate naming. No arg is
deemed extra, though further inspection of the conflicting args
might get there. Since assignment syntax in parens is more|less
deprecated (?), no more effort is done here.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Use removeNames to help diagnose the application.
Supplement the error message with how many extra
args and any other residual assignments that the
user might have thought was a properly named arg.
The error message is gradual: succinct for short
arg lists, more verbose for longer applications.
Very long arg lists are probably generated, so
that message is the least colloquial.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
`Scope`'s `filter` is implemented using `toList`,
so may as well start with `toList`ourselves.
Also fused some `filter`/`foreach` combos.
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
`convertToAssignment` is triggered on a type error but it doesn't seem
to really care what the error is as long as the expression can be
converted to an assignment expression.
This patch fixes that by checking whether the qualifier of the selection
contains any errors before deciding to continue with the conversion.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
If the constructor invokes itself, say so.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Collapse conditionals into match for legible.
Yes, guards have scary eval order.
|
