| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-10009 Fields survive untypecheck/retypecheck
|
| | | |/ /
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Some places in the compiler, and many places in macros, use
`untypecheck` (aka `resetAttrs`) to strip types and local symbols
from a tree before retypechecking it under some different context.
The refactoring of the desugaring of vals and vars in Scala 2.12.0
broke an assumption in this facility.
When a ValDef must be split into multiple members (e.g. a field and
a getter, or a perhaps also a setter), the ValDef that was parsed
assumes the role of the `field`, and the trees for other members are
stached by `Namer` to the `synthetics` map of the compilation unit,
in order to spliced into the right statement list by typechecking.
See `enterGetterSetter` for more details.
However, the parsed ValDef is now used verbatim, carrying the meaning
(ie, the symbol) of the `private[this]` field. This tree now had
an inconsistency between the flags in `tree.mods.flags` and
`tree.symbol.flags`. `tree.name` also differed from `tree.symbol.name`
(the latter was renamed to be a local name, ie one with a trailing space.)
When `ResetAttrs` stripped off the symbol and we retypechecked, we'd
end up with two symbols in scope with the same name.
In the first from the `run` test:
```
================================================================================
{
class a extends scala.AnyRef {
def <init>(): a = {
a.super.<init>();
()
};
private[this] val x: Int = 42;
<stable> <accessor> def x: Int = a.this.x
};
new a()
}
{
class a extends scala.AnyRef {
def <init>() = {
super.<init>();
()
};
val x = 42; // oops, the name is "x" rather than "x " and we've missing `private[this]`!
<stable> <accessor> def x: Int = a.this.x
};
new a()
}
scala.tools.reflect.ToolBoxError: reflective typecheck has failed: x is already defined as value x
```
This commit uses the flags and name of the symbol in `typedValDef`.
I've also had to modify the internals of `CodePrinter` to use the
implicit, override, and deferred flags from the modifiers of an
accessor when recovering pre-typer tree for a ValDef.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | | |
Avoid name table pollution with fresh existentials
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
During large compilations runs, the large numbers of globally unique
fresh names for existentials captured from prefixes of `asSeenFrom`.
is a) somewhat wasteful (all these names are interned in the name table)
, and, b) form a pathological case for the current implementation of
`Names#hashValue`, which leads to overfull hash-buckets in the name table.
`hashValue` should probably be improved, but my attempts to do so have
shown a small performance degradation in some benchmarks. So this commit
starts by being more frugal with these names, only uniquely naming
within an `asSeenFrom` operation.
References scala/scala-dev#246
|
| | |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
Scaladoc was prone to warning about java imports.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-9953 Any Any aborts warn on equals
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Don't warn about equals if any `Any` is involved. cf SI-8965
The condition for warning is that both types lub to a supertype
of Object.
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-6978 No linting of Java parens
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Don't lint overriding of nullary by non-nullary
when non-nullary is Java-defined. They can't help it.
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Tweak the "should I synthesize now" test for
case modules, so that the tree is inserted in
the same tree as the case class.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
now that STARR includes the relevant fix
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
No warn when discarding r.f(): r.type
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The paradigm is `def add(x: X): Unit = listBuffer += x`.
The value that is discarded is not new information.
Also cleans up the recent tweaks to help messaging.
Adds newlines in case they ask for multiple helps.
|
| | |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Super calls to indirect java parent interfaces cannot be emitted, an
error message is emitted during SuperAccessors.
The error message was missing if the super call was non-qualified,
resulting in an assertion failure in the backend.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We don't hit this code path during bootstrapping, but we could
conceivably hit it with macros or compiler plugins peering into
the future through atPhase before refchecks as run.
Also rename a method to reflect the generality of the info
transform (it does more than mixin, now.)
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Only mixin fields + accessors into class infos of classes that are
either in the current run, or appear in a superclass chain of a class
in the current run.
This is analagous to what happens in the mixin phase.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The restriction for super calls to methods defined in indirect super
classes introduced in a980fde was over-restrictive. In particular, it
ruled out a valid code pattern to select a method from a superclass
when an unqualified `super` would resolve to an override defined in a
trait (example in the commit as a test).
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
Fixes to mixin forwarders
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If a call super[T].m resolves to a method A.m where A is a class, but
not the direct superclass of the current class, there is no way to
emit an invocation of A.m: `invokespecial A.m` will resolve to B.m
where B is the superclass of the current class.
This commit adds an error message in this case.
Note that this is similar to an existing error message for qualified
super calls to a non-direct superclass:
class A { def m = 1 }
class B extends A { override def m = 2 }
class C extends B { override def m = super[A].m }
Gives "error: A does not name a parent class of class C".
If the user means to call method m in the superclass, he can write an
unqualified `super.m`.
An similar error message is introduced if A is a Java-defined interface
(and m is a default method), and A is not a direct parent of the current
class. In this case `invokespecial A.m` is invalid bytecode. The
solution is to add A as a direct parent of the current class.
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
Fields: expand lazy vals during fields, like modules
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Essentially, we fuse mixin and lazyvals into the fields phase.
With fields mixing in trait members into subclasses, we
have all info needed to compute bitmaps, and thus we can
synthesize the synchronisation logic as well.
By doing this before erasure we get better signatures,
and before specialized means specialized lazy vals work now.
Mixins is now almost reduced to its essence: implementing
super accessors and forwarders. It still synthesizes
accessors for param accessors and early init trait vals.
Concretely, trait lazy vals are mixed into subclasses
with the needed synchronization logic in place, as do
lazy vals in classes and methods. Similarly, modules
are initialized using double checked locking.
Since the code to initialize a module is short,
we do not emit compute methods for modules (anymore).
For simplicity, local lazy vals do not get a compute method either.
The strange corner case of constant-typed final lazy vals
is resolved in favor of laziness, by no longer assigning
a constant type to a lazy val (see widenIfNecessary in namers).
If you explicitly ask for something lazy, you get laziness;
with the constant-typedness implicit, it yields to the
conflicting `lazy` modifier because it is explicit.
Co-Authored-By: Lukas Rytz <lukas@lightbend.com>
Fixes scala/scala-dev#133
Inspired by dotc, desugar a local `lazy val x = rhs` into
```
val x$lzy = new scala.runtime.LazyInt()
def x(): Int = {
x$lzy.synchronized {
if (!x$lzy.initialized) {
x$lzy.initialized = true
x$lzy.value = rhs
}
x$lzy.value
}
}
```
Note that the 2.11 decoding (into a local variable and a bitmap) also
creates boxes for local lazy vals, in fact two for each lazy val:
```
def f = {
lazy val x = 0
x
}
```
desugars to
```
public int f() {
IntRef x$lzy = IntRef.zero();
VolatileByteRef bitmap$0 = VolatileByteRef.create((byte)0);
return this.x$1(x$lzy, bitmap$0);
}
private final int x$lzycompute$1(IntRef x$lzy$1, VolatileByteRef bitmap$0$1) {
C c = this;
synchronized (c) {
if ((byte)(bitmap$0$1.elem & 1) == 0) {
x$lzy$1.elem = 0;
bitmap$0$1.elem = (byte)(bitmap$0$1.elem | 1);
}
return x$lzy$1.elem;
}
}
private final int x$1(IntRef x$lzy$1, VolatileByteRef bitmap$0$1) {
return (byte)(bitmap$0$1.elem & 1) == 0 ?
this.x$lzycompute$1(x$lzy$1, bitmap$0$1) : x$lzy$1.elem;
}
```
An additional problem with the above encoding is that the `lzycompute`
method synchronizes on `this`. In connection with the new lambda
encoding that no longer generates anonymous classes, captured lazy vals
no longer synchronize on the lambda object.
The new encoding solves this problem (scala/scala-dev#133)
by synchronizing on the lazy holder.
Currently, we don't exploit the fact that the initialized field
is `@volatile`, because it's not clear the performance is needed
for local lazy vals (as they are not contended, and as soon as
the VM warms up, biased locking should deal with that)
Note, be very very careful when moving to double-checked locking,
as this needs a different variation than the one we use for
class-member lazy vals. A read of a volatile field of a class
does not necessarily impart any knowledge about a "subsequent" read
of another non-volatile field of the same object. A pair of
volatile reads and write can be used to implement a lock, but it's
not clear if the complexity is worth an unproven performance gain.
(Once the performance gain is proven, let's change the encoding.)
- don't explicitly init bitmap in bytecode
- must apply method to () explicitly after uncurry
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Final implementation based on feedback by Jason
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
They remain ValDefs until then.
- remove lazy accessor logic
now that we have a single ValDef for lazy vals,
with the underlying machinery being hidden until the fields phase
leave a `@deprecated def lazyAccessor` for scala-refactoring
- don't skolemize in purely synthetic getters,
but *do* skolemize in lazy accessor during typers
Lazy accessors have arbitrary user code, so have to skolemize.
We exempt the purely synthetic accessors (`isSyntheticAccessor`)
for strict vals, and lazy accessors emitted by the fields phase
to avoid spurious type mismatches due to issues with existentials
(That bug is tracked as https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165)
When we're past typer, lazy accessors are synthetic,
but before they are user-defined to make this hack less hacky,
we could rework our flag usage to allow for
requiring both the ACCESSOR and the SYNTHETIC bits
to identify synthetic accessors and trigger the exemption.
see also https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165
ok 7 - pos/existentials-harmful.scala
ok 8 - pos/t2435.scala
ok 9 - pos/existentials.scala
previous attempt: skolemize type of val inside the private[this] val
because its type is only observed from inside the
accessor methods (inside the method scope its existentials are skolemized)
- bean accessors have regular method types, not nullary method types
- must re-infer type for param accessor
some weirdness with scoping of param accessor vals and defs?
- tailcalls detect lazy vals, which are defdefs after fields
- can inline constant lazy val from trait
- don't mix in fields etc for an overridden lazy val
- need try-lift in lazy vals: the assign is not seen in uncurry
because fields does the transform (see run/t2333.scala)
- ensure field members end up final in bytecode
- implicit class companion method: annot filter in completer
- update check: previous error message was tangled up with unrelated
field definitions (`var s` and `val s_scope`),
now it behaves consistently whether those are val/vars or defs
- analyzer plugin check update seems benign, but no way to know...
- error message gen: there is no underlying symbol for a deferred var
look for missing getter/setter instead
- avoid retypechecking valdefs while duplicating for specialize
see pos/spec-private
- Scaladoc uniformly looks to field/accessor symbol
- test updates to innerClassAttribute by Lukas
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we don't widen, we'll fail to find the setter when
typing `x = 42`, because `x` is constant-folded to `0`,
as its type is `=> Int(0)`. After widening, `x` is
type checked to `x` and its symbol is the getter in the
trait, which can then be rewritten to the setter.
Regression spotted and test case by szeiger.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-5294 SI-6161 Hard graft in asSeenFrom, refinements, and existentials [ci: last-only]
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Usually, `contains` should not look into class symbol infos.
For instance, we expect that:
```
scala> trait C { def foo: Int }; typeOf[C].contains(IntClass)
defined trait C
res1: Boolean = false
```
We do, however, look at the decls of a `RefinedType` in contains:
```
scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].contains(IntClass)
res2: Boolean = true
```
Things get a little vague, however, when we consider a type ref
to the refinement class symbol of a refined type.
```
scala> TypeRef(NoPrefix, typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol, Nil)
res3: $r.intp.global.Type = AnyRef{def foo: Int}
scala> .contains(IntClass)
res4: Boolean = false
```
These show up in the first element of the base type seq of a refined
type, e.g:
```
scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol.tpe_*
res5: $r.intp.global.Type = AnyRef{def foo: Int}
scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].baseTypeSeq(0).getClass
res7: Class[_ <: $r.intp.global.Type] = class scala.reflect.internal.Types$RefinementTypeRef
scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol.tpe_*.getClass
res6: Class[_ <: $r.intp.global.Type] = class scala.reflect.internal.Types$RefinementTypeRef
```
This commit takes the opinion that a `RefinementTypeRef` should be
transparent with respect to `contains`. This paves the way for fixing
the base type sequences of existential types over refinement types.
The implementation of `ContainsCollector` was already calling
`normalize`, which goes from `RefinementTypeRef` to `RefinedType`.
This commit maps over the result, which looks in the parents and
decls.
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
only exclude FunctionN types themselves from SAM, don't exclude their
subtypes; we want e.g.
trait T extends Function1[String, String]
(x => x) : T
to compile
reference: https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/206
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-9847 Nuance pure expr statement warning
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Clarify the current warning, which means that an expression
split over multiple lines may not be parsed as naively expected.
When typing a block, attempt minor nuance. For instance, a
single expression is not in need of parens. Try to avoid
duplicate warnings for expressions that were adapted away
from result position.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Propagate overloaded function type to expected arg type
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Infer missing parameter types for function literals passed
to higher-order overloaded methods by deriving the
expected argument type from the function types in the
overloaded method type's argument types.
This eases the pain caused by methods becoming overloaded
because SAM types and function types are compatible,
which used to disable parameter type inference because
for overload resolution arguments are typed without
expected type, while typedFunction needs the expected
type to infer missing parameter types for function literals.
It also aligns us with dotty. The special case for
function literals seems reasonable, as it has precedent,
and it just enables the special case in typing function
literals (derive the param types from the expected type).
Since this does change type inference, you can opt out
using the Scala 2.11 source level.
Fix scala/scala-dev#157
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixes to Java source support in Scaladoc
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
- fix initialization NPE in doc headers
- fix assertion errors for java fields
- ignore comments when deciding where to put interface methods
- consider DocDefs when checking for constructors
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
[Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>: remove obsolete comments and fix tests]
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The check for inheriting two conflicting members was wrong for default
methods, leading to a missing error message.
We were also not issuing "needs `override' modifier" when overriding a
default method.
Removes two methods:
- `isDeferredOrJavaDefault` had a single use that is removed in this commit.
- `isDeferredNotJavaDefault` is redundant with `isDeferred`, because
no default method has the `DEFERRED` flag:
- For symbols originating in the classfile parser this was the case
from day one: default methods don't receive the `DEFERRED` flag.
Only abstract interface methods do, as they have the `JAVA_ACC_ABSTRACT`
flag in bytecode, which the classfile parser translates to `DEFERRED`.
- For symbols created by the Java source parser, we don't add the
`DEFERRED` to default methods anymore since 373db1e.
Fixes scala/scala-dev#128
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-8339 remove deprecated rewrite of withFilter -> filter
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
You must implement the `withFilter` method to use
`if`-guards in a `for`-comprehension.
(Drop pos/t7239.scala because it relied on this rewrite.)
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Introducing: the fields phase [ci: last-only]
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Derive/filter/propagate annotations in info transformer,
don't rely on having type checked the derived trees in order
to see the annotations.
Use synthetics mechanism for bean accessors -- the others
will soon follow.
Propagate inferred tpt from valdef to accessors
by setting type in right spot of synthetic tree
during the info completer.
No need to add trees in derivedTrees, and get rid of
some overfactoring in method synthesis, now that we have
joined symbol and tree creation.
Preserve symbol order because tests are sensitive to it.
Drop warning on potentially discarded annotations,
I don't think this warrants a warning.
Motivated by breaking the scala-js compiler, which relied
on annotations appearing when trees are type checked.
Now that ordering constraint is gone in the new encoding,
we may as well finally fix annotation assignment.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
There's no other place to squirrel away the annotation
until we create a field in a subclass.
The test documents the idea, but does not capture the
regression seen in the wild, as explained in a comment.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Discovered by scala-js's test suite.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Remove weird special cases for private-local fields
and parameter accessor (fields).
One change with the new trait val encoding:
```
scala> trait T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
<console>:11: error: method x is defined twice;
the conflicting variable x was defined at line 11:37
trait T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
^
```
Whereas:
```
scala> class T { private[this] var x: String = "1" ; def x(): Int = 1 }
defined class T
```
Before, both the `class` and `trait` definition were accepted.
(Because there is no accessor for a private[this] val/var,
and a MethodType does not match the type of a value.)
(Dotty accepts neither the class or the trait definition.)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
... instead of emitting ValDefs and field symbols, which are then
promptly unlinked and transformed by the "late trait methods"
logic in mixins...
Mixins still synthesizes implementations for these accessors
in subclasses.
A paramaccessor in a trait is a method without an underlying field.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Remove obsolete hack for BeanSetter's RHS
Use currentOwner.isClass instead of exprOwner.isLocalDummy
Refactor: shortest branches first in if/else
Fix comments from when the prototype ran before refchecks
Also, store `isScala212` as a `val` in `Namer`
since the `def` on `settings` parses the version each time...
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
We do this during uncurry so we can insert the necessary
applications to the empty argument list. Fields is too late.
Refchecks is no longer an info transform.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
For now, keep the info transform in refchecks.
Ultimately, refchecks should only check, not transform trees/infos.
Fixes https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/126:
the accessor for a module in a trait is correctly marked non-final
(it's deferred).
|
