| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I imagine these date back to old Subversion days and are probably the
result of inadvertent commits from Windows users with vcs client
configs.
having the bit set isn't really harmful most of the time,
but it's just not right, and it makes the files stand out in directory
listings for no reason
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit corrects many typos found in scaladocs, comments and
documentation. It should reduce a bit number of PRs which fix one
typo.
There are no changes in the 'real' code except one corrected name of
a JUnit test method and some error messages in exceptions. In the case
of typos in other method or field names etc., I just skipped them.
Obviously this commit doesn't fix all existing typos. I just generated
in IntelliJ the list of potential typos and looked through it quickly.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Was: ``blah''
Now: `blah`
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are the regexp replacements performed:
Sxcala
-> Scala
Copyright (\d*) LAMP/EPFL
-> Copyright $1-2012 LAMP/EPFL
Copyright (\d*)-(\d*)(,?) LAMP/EPFL
-> Copyright $1-2012 LAMP/EPFL
Copyright (\d*)-(\d*) Scala Solutions and LAMP/EPFL
-> Copyright $1-2012 Scala Solutions and LAMP/EPFL
\(C\) (\d*)-(\d*) LAMP/EPFL
-> (C) $1-2012 LAMP/EPFL
Copyright \(c\) (\d*)-(\d*)(.*?)EPFL
-> Copyright (c) $1-2012$3EPFL
The last one was needed for two HTML-ified copyright notices.
Here's the summarized diff:
Created using
```
git diff -w | grep ^- | sort | uniq | mate
git diff -w | grep ^+ | sort | uniq | mate
```
```
- <div id="footer">Scala programming documentation. Copyright (c) 2003-2011 <a href="http://www.epfl.ch" target="_top">EPFL</a>, with contributions from <a href="http://typesafe.com" target="_top">Typesafe</a>.</div>
- copyright.string=Copyright 2002-2011, LAMP/EPFL
- <meta name="Copyright" content="(C) 2002-2011 LAMP/EPFL"/>
- * Copyright 2002-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2004-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2005 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2005-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2006-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2007 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2007-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2009-2011 Scala Solutions and LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2009-2011 Scxala Solutions and LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2010-2011 LAMP/EPFL
- * Copyright 2012 LAMP/EPFL
-# Copyright 2002-2011, LAMP/EPFL
-* Copyright 2005-2011 LAMP/EPFL
-/* NSC -- new Scala compiler -- Copyright 2007-2011 LAMP/EPFL */
-rem # Copyright 2002-2011, LAMP/EPFL
```
```
+ <div id="footer">Scala programming documentation. Copyright (c) 2003-2012 <a href="http://www.epfl.ch" target="_top">EPFL</a>, with contributions from <a href="http://typesafe.com" target="_top">Typesafe</a>.</div>
+ copyright.string=Copyright 2002-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ <meta name="Copyright" content="(C) 2002-2012 LAMP/EPFL"/>
+ * Copyright 2002-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2004-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2005-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2006-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2007-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2009-2012 Scala Solutions and LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2010-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+ * Copyright 2011-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+# Copyright 2002-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+* Copyright 2005-2012 LAMP/EPFL
+/* NSC -- new Scala compiler -- Copyright 2007-2012 LAMP/EPFL */
+rem # Copyright 2002-2012 LAMP/EPFL
```
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Group class members based on their semantic relationship. To do this:
- @group on members, only need to do it for the non-overridden members
- -groups flag passes to scaladoc, groups="on" in ant
- @groupdesc Group Group Description to add descriptions
- @groupname Group New name for group
- @groupprio Group <int> (lower is better)
See test/scaladoc/run/groups.scala for a top-to-bottom example
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removed all the trailing whitespace to make eugene happier.
Will try to keep it that way by protecting at the merge level.
Left the tabs in place because they can't be uniformly changed
to spaces, some are 2, some are 4, some are 8, whee.
|
| |
|
|
| |
That was preventing the compiler API scaladoc from building
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From now on, the usecases inherit the comments from their parents, such
as the explanation and the annotations: @param, @tparam, @return, etc.
An example of usecase comment inheritance is:
/**
* The test function tests the parameter param for ...
*
* @param theParam the implicit parameter to be tested for ...
* @return the result of the test
*
*
*
* @usecase def test(): Bool
*
* The test function tests the parameter taken implicitly from scope.
* Example: `test()`
*
* @return the result of the test for the current scope
*
*
*
* @usecase def test(theParam: SomeType): Bool
*
* This takes the explicit value passed.
* Example: `test(3)`
*
* @param theParam the explicit parameter to be tested for ...
*/
def test(implicit theParam: SomeType): Bool
Notice both usecases override the explanation with their own examples.
The first usecase also overrides the "@return" annotation while the 2nd
usecase overrides the "@param theParam" annotation. If they didn't
override the explanations and annotations, they would inherit the
values from the actual implementation, def test(implicit ...)
This will be followed by @inheritdoc, which enables more fine-grained
control over comment inheritance. The full explanation of using comment
inheritance and @inheritdoc and their interaction with variables is
given at https://wiki.scala-lang.org/display/SW/Tags+and+Annotations
in the "Comment inheritance" and "Inheritance Example" sections.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding some Sets/Maps to perRunCaches, and eliminating ambiguously named
imports.
Did a tour of the compiler adding a few longer-lived mutable structures
to the per-run cache clearing mechanism. Some of these were not a big
threat, but there is (almost) literally no cost to tracking them and the
fewer mutable structures which are created "lone wolf style" the easier
it is to spot the one playing by his own rules.
While I was at it I followed through on long held ambition to eliminate
the importing of highly ambiguous names like "Map" and "HashSet" from
the mutable and immutable packages. I didn't quite manage elimination
but it's pretty close. Something potentially as pernicious which I
didn't do much about is this import:
import scala.collection._
Imagine coming across that one on lines 407 and 474 of a 1271 file.
That's not cool. Some poor future programmer will be on line 1100 and
use "Map[A, B]" in some function and only after the product has shipped
will it be discovered that the signature is wrong and the rocket will
now be crashing into the mountainside straightaway. No review.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moved scala.reflect.Chars to scala.reflect.internal.Chars, un-splitting
the scala.reflect package. This is necessary for running in an OSGi
container, such as Eclipse. A package may not be contributed by two
different bundles (in this case the library and the compiler). It may
be moved back when 'scala.reflect' exists only in one place. review by
extempore.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch and the several to follow represent an attempt to break
up a very large patch from martin which moves much of the compiler's
typing infrastructure into the library so that we can utilize the same
machinery at runtime that we do at compile time.
Said attempt was not very successful, either at maintaining working
order while committing incrementally or at subdividing the patch into
distinct cohesive units. So let the record show that I tried.
-- some notes on the implementation --
This should not be judged as a finished work, but it's a necessary
opening step for implementing a reflection API without duplicating much
of the compiler.
The files in scala.reflect.common are destined for the library (not the
compiler, where they are now) but have not yet made the leap to manage
compatibility issues.
scala.reflect.generic is likely to be replaced by an alias to
scala.reflect.common.
The fate of scala.reflect.Code and its derived classes is yet to be
determined.
This first patch contains about the only delta against martin's patch,
which is to promote Chars into scala.reflect. Review by odersky.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Removed more than 3400 svn '$Id' keywords and related junk.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a brief diversion from real work, implemented Damerau–Levenshtein
and ran it on trunk to elicit obvious misspellings. Unfortunately
they're mostly in places like compiler comments which real people never
see, but I fixed them anyway. All those English Lit majors who peruse
our sources are sure to be pleased. No review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* tags in code blocks no longer confuse the parser;
* `@note` and `@example` are recognised tags;
* Empty comments no longer generate "must start with a sentence" warnings;
* `@usecase` parsing works better in some situations with blank comment lines above or below.
No review.
|
|
|
refined doc comments generation; refactored code into new Chars,
DocStrings classes in util. Added some more doc comments to collection
classes.
|
