| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| | |
Fixed SI-5031. Only consider classes when looking for companion class.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
sym.effectiveOwner revealed this piece of inconsistency. companionModule
is fine because similar check is there already.
Review by @paulp.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Closes SI-5882
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I changed the SIP and added a test.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I have added a restriction that value classes may not contain inner classes or objects. This makes sense as the "outer" field of any such classes or objects would be ephemeral, with surprising results. SIP-15 has been changed accordingly.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-2038 make pt fully-defined when typing Typed
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
dropExistential turns existentials in the expected type (pt) that's passed to `typed`
into `BoundedWildcardType`s, but those should not end up in trees
when typing a `Typed` node, we didn't check for the type being fully defined (`isFullyDefined`)
(and thus did not make it fully defined by turning these BWTs into existentials again using `makeFullyDefined`)
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixed SI-5603. Early definitions now get transparent positions.
|
| | |_|/
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This includes a fix for a minor problem described in #594 -
ensureNonOverlapping still focuses on default position when outside of early defs.
Review by @dragos, @odersky.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Avoids loading scala.package and scala.reflect.package from source if a ...
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
classfile exists.
We know that loading these packages from source leads to compilation errors. To reproduce: Update scala.reflect.package, make sure it is on the source path and recompile anything using it. You will get a number of errors having to do with ClassTags and macro expansions. With the patch, these errors go away because the package is not loaded as long as a classfile exists.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Closes SI-5878
|
| | |_|_|/
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
We need to impose an additional rule on value classes: They may not unbox directly or indirectly to themselves.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
IDE improvements, with particular focus on making worksheets work.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Debug changes
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Adds method askForResponse which returns a response immediately instead of waiting for a result. That way, one can wait for an ask's result using a timeout.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Code instrumentation needs to see a consistent snapshot of a source file. To achieve that we disable interrupts during getInstrumented.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
To try it out:
run "instrument worksheet" as usual in the REPL. Worksheet needs to have enclosing object definition. Say it is named "Obj".
This will generate a file Obj$instrumented. You can compile that file separately and run it using Java. It should reproduce itself.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
SI-6140 Scaladoc infinite recursion in wiki parser
|
| | |_|/ /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
introduced by dc70d1b7.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Issue/4560
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This reverts commit cb4fd65825f3c88908103e48d0d7e89d70d26c22.
Conflicts:
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/symtab/Types.scala
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/typechecker/Contexts.scala
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This reverts commit 124cf3f9cbdc582a432c13edd229ba9b8726b99f.
Conflicts:
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/transform/CleanUp.scala
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This reverts commit 7127d8293775905acd0d04e21d9e045b5c029261.
Conflicts:
test/files/run/t4560.scala
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Following this commit are reversions of three prior commits which
introduced difficulties of their own, plus extra tests for this
issue and SI-4601, all of which I pinched from jrudolph.
Maybe there was a good reason for some of the complicated code
related to this ticket. I took the naive position that if we avoided
generating a method call to a particular receiver if the receiver
has no such method, we would encounter fewer NoSuchMethodErrors.
I would believe one can construct a scenario which this doesn't
handle correctly, but it's hard to believe this isn't a big
improvement. Review by @jrudolph, @odersky.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
SI-6142: warn @inline-methods ending up not inlined (rightfully or not)
|
| | |/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
... in a less nice way than I would like. Essentially, we mask type errors at later stages that arise from comparing existentials and skolems because we know that they are not tracked correctly through all tree transformations. Never mind that all these types are going erased anyway shortly afterwards. It does not smell nice. But as I write in the comment, maybe the best way out is to
avoid skolems altogether. Such a change by far exceeds the scope of this pull request however.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This pretty much takes us down to deprecation and inliner warnings.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Since we were blessed with spurious warnings.
With this commit I have eliminated every warning in trunk
except for deprecation, feature, and inliner warnings, plus
one due to SI-6146. I'm not going to count "pattern matcher
performance warnings" which are presently preventing me from
turning on -unchecked even though there are no genuine
-unchecked warnings remaining. Hey, get your own option!
Conflicts:
src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/transform/SpecializeTypes.scala
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
And also non-exhaustive matches.
And added -nowarn to the build options for scalacheck,
we don't need to hear the warnings for code we aren't
able to fix.
|
|/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Don't warn on "uncheckable" type patterns if they can be
statically guaranteed, regardless of their runtime checkability.
This covers patterns like Seq[Any] and lots more.
Review by @adriaanm.
|
|\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | | |
SI-4440 workaround: avoid outer accessor that'll vanish
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
outer accessors of final classes are dropped in constructors
apply some foresight in explicit outer and replace those doomed outer checks by `true`
(since this is unfortunate, we generate an unchecked warning)
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-6117 regression involving import ambiguity.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Today I learned that
foo.member("bar") != foo.member("bar")
if bar is overloaded, because each lookup of an overloaded member
creates a new symbol (with equivalent OverloadedTypes.) How should symbols
be compared so these do not appear unequal? Is there a method which
unpacks the alternatives and compares them individually? It seems likely
there are additional bugs which arise from not covering this case.
Since this bug is in the context of importing, if the prefixes are
identical then I can compare the names instead of the symbols and this
issue goes away. But for the rest of the time during which one might
encounter overloaded symbols, that would be a very lossy operation,
since the overloaded symbol might be encoding any subset of the members
with that name.
There are lots of references to "OverloadedSymbol" in the comments of
various methods in Types, but no such class is visible in the history.
If we had such a thing, we could refine its equals method to recognize
equivalent overloads.
Review by @odersky.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
"If the names don't fit, do not commit!"
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Improve unchecked warnings.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Spurious test was not good. Better test avoids suppressing
some legitimate warnings. Review by @moors.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | | |
SI-6111 accept single-subpattern unapply pattern
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |_|/
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
An extractor pattern `X(p)` should type check for any `X.unapply`/`X.unapplySeq`
that returns an `Option[_]` -- previously we were confused about the case where
it was an `Option[(T1, ... , Tn)]`. In this case, the expected type for the
pattern `p` is simply `(T1, ... , Tn)`.
While I was at it, tried to clean up unapplyTypeList and friends (by replacing them by extractorFormalTypes).
From the spec:
8.1.8 ExtractorPatterns
An extractor pattern x(p1, ..., pn) where n ≥ 0 is of the same syntactic form as a constructor pattern.
However, instead of a case class, the stable identifier x denotes an object which has a member method named unapply or unapplySeq that matches the pattern.
An unapply method in an object x matches the pattern x(p1, ..., pn) if it takes exactly one argument and one of the following applies:
n = 0 and unapply’s result type is Boolean.
n = 1 and unapply’s result type is Option[T], for some type T.
the (only) argument pattern p1 is typed in turn with expected type T
n > 1 and unapply’s result type is Option[(T1, ..., Tn)], for some types T1, ..., Tn.
the argument patterns p1, ..., pn are typed in turn with expected types T1, ..., Tn
|
|/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Changed behavior so that when determining the target variance of a method parameter,
the variance in formals comes first. If variance is still undecided by that,
the variance in the result type is used as a secondary criterion.
(This is also done when determining prototype type params.)
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
SI-6090 correct rewriting of overloaded value class ==
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Sharpens the test so that only Object_== and Object_!= methods on valueclasses may be rewritten in posterasure, whereas user-defined methods are not rewritten.
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| | |
Handle multiple packages in one source file in the presentation compiler.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The PC symbol loader would mistakenly refuse to enter symbols if more than one package declaration occurred
in the same file. This has become common practice:
package object foo { … }
package foo { … }
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-1832 consistent symbols in casedef's pattern&body
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
the only change to typedBind in this commit (beyond refactoring to keep my eyes from bleeding),
is explained by the added comment:
have to imperatively set the symbol for this bind to keep it in sync with the symbols used in the body of a case
when type checking a case we imperatively update the symbols in the body of the case
those symbols are bound by the symbols in the Binds in the pattern of the case,
so, if we set the symbols in the case body, but not in the patterns,
then re-type check the casedef (for a second try in typedApply for example -- SI-1832),
we are no longer in sync: the body has symbols set that do not appear in the patterns
since body1 is not necessarily equal to body, we must return a copied tree,
but we must still mutate the original bind
|
| | | |
|