| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prepend was throwing segfaults as it was handled differently from Append. This brings the two into line with each other.
There are various optimizations that could be applied that have not been, however, such as intercepting sequential prepends and generating one multi-prepend instead of nested single-element prepends.
Unit test added to verify minimally that bug is gone.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code
in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I
could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases
which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace.
Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing
space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least
reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript
code on the way in.
Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing
whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof
against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40
lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files.
It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery
on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest
it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Confusing, now-it-happens now-it-doesn't mysteries lurk
in the darkness. When scala packages are declared like this:
package scala.collection.mutable
Then paths relative to scala can easily be broken via the unlucky
presence of an empty (or nonempty) directory. Example:
// a.scala
package scala.foo
class Bar { new util.Random }
% scalac ./a.scala
% mkdir util
% scalac ./a.scala
./a.scala:4: error: type Random is not a member of package util
new util.Random
^
one error found
There are two ways to play defense against this:
- don't use relative paths; okay sometimes, less so others
- don't "opt out" of the scala package
This commit mostly pursues the latter, with occasional doses
of the former.
I created a scratch directory containing these empty directories:
actors annotation ant api asm beans cmd collection compat
concurrent control convert docutil dtd duration event factory
forkjoin generic hashing immutable impl include internal io
logging macros man1 matching math meta model mutable nsc parallel
parsing partest persistent process pull ref reflect reify remote
runtime scalap scheduler script swing sys text threadpool tools
transform unchecked util xml
I stopped when I could compile the main src directories
even with all those empties on my classpath.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some names I missed in 55b609458fd .
How one might know when one is done:
mkdir scratch && cd scratch
mkdir annotation beans collection compat concurrent io \
math parallel ref reflect runtime scala sys testing \
text tools util xml
scalac $(find ../src/library -name '*.scala')
Until recently that would fail with about a billion errors. When it
compiles, that's when you're done. And that's where this commit
takes us, for src/library at least.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These things are killing me. Constructions like
package scala.foo.bar.baz
import foo.Other
DO NOT WORK in general. Such files are not really in the
"scala" package, because it is not declared
package scala
package foo.bar.baz
And there is a second problem: using a relative path name means
compilation will fail in the presence of a directory of the same
name, e.g.
% mkdir reflect
% scalac src/reflect/scala/reflect/internal/util/Position.scala
src/reflect/scala/reflect/internal/util/Position.scala:9: error:
object ClassTag is not a member of package reflect
import reflect.ClassTag
^
src/reflect/scala/reflect/internal/util/Position.scala:10: error:
object base is not a member of package reflect
import reflect.base.Attachments
^
As a rule, do not use relative package paths unless you have
explicitly imported the path to which you think you are relative.
Better yet, don't use them at all. Unfortunately they mostly work
because scala variously thinks everything scala.* is in the scala
package and/or because you usually aren't bootstrapping and it
falls through to an existing version of the class already on the
classpath.
Making the paths explicit is not a complete solution -
in particular, we remain enormously vulnerable to any directory
or package called "scala" which isn't ours - but it greatly
limts the severity of the problem.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit and the two subsequent commits were contributed by:
Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org>.
I combined some commits and mangled his commit messages, but all the
credit is his. This pursues the same approach to classfile reduction
seen in r19989 when AbstractFunctionN was introduced, but applies it to
the collections. Thanks to -Xlint it's easy to verify that the private
types don't escape.
Design considerations as articulated by Todd:
* Don't necessarily create concrete types for _everything_. Where a
subtrait only provides a few additional methods, don't bother; instead,
use the supertrait's concrete class and retain the "with". For example,
"extends AbstractSeq[A] with LinearSeq[A]".
* Examine all classes with .class file size greater than 10k. Named
classes and class names ending in $$anon$<num> are candidates for
analysis.
* If a return type is currently inferred where an anon subclass would be
returned, make the return type explicit. Don't allow the library-private
abstract classes to leak into the public namespace [and scaladoc].
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactoring the collections api to support differentiation between
referring to a sequential collection and a parallel collection, and to
support referring to both types of collections.
New set of traits Gen* are now superclasses of both their * and Par* subclasses. For example, GenIterable is a superclass of both Iterable and ParIterable. Iterable and ParIterable are not in a subclassing relation. The new class hierarchy is illustrated below (simplified, not all relations and classes are shown):
TraversableOnce --> GenTraversableOnce
^ ^
| |
Traversable --> GenTraversable
^ ^
| |
Iterable --> GenIterable <-- ParIterable
^ ^ ^
| | |
Seq --> GenSeq <-- ParSeq
(the *Like, *View and *ViewLike traits have a similar hierarchy)
General views extract common view functionality from parallel and
sequential collections.
This design also allows for more flexible extensions to the collections
framework. It also allows slowly factoring out common functionality up
into Gen* traits.
From now on, it is possible to write this:
import collection._
val p = parallel.ParSeq(1, 2, 3)
val g: GenSeq[Int] = p // meaning a General Sequence
val s = g.seq // type of s is Seq[Int]
for (elem <- g) {
// do something without guarantees on sequentiality of foreach
// this foreach may be executed in parallel
}
for (elem <- s) {
// do something with a guarantee that foreach is executed in order, sequentially
}
for (elem <- p) {
// do something concurrently, in parallel
}
This also means that some signatures had to be changed. For example,
method `flatMap` now takes `A => GenTraversableOnce[B]`, and `zip` takes
a `GenIterable[B]`.
Also, there are mutable & immutable Gen* trait variants. They have
generic companion functionality.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Almost all view classes now list parents like
trait Appended[B >: A] extends super.Appended[B] with Transformed[B]
instead of the former
trait Appended[B >: A] extends Transformed[B] with super.Appended[B]
because as it was, the implementation of foreach in
TraversableViewLike#Transformed was repeatedly trumping overrides found
in e.g. IterableLike. This change was not without its own consequences,
and much of the rest of the patch is dealing with that. A more general
issue is clearly revealed here: there is no straightforward way to deal
with trait composition and overrides when some methods should prefer B
over A and some the reverse. (It's more like A through Z in this case.)
That closes #4279, with some views being five orders of magnitude slower
than necessary. There is a test that confirms they'll stay performance
neighbors.
In the view classes (Zipped, Mapped, etc.) I attended to them with
comb and brush until they were reasonably consistent. I only use
"override" where necessary and throw in some "final" in the interests
of trying to anchor the composition outcome. I also switched the
newSliced, newZipped, etc. methods to use early init syntax since a
number have abstract vals and I found at least one bug originating with
uninitialized access.
There was a piece of a parallel collections scalacheck test failing,
which
I disabled out of expedience - am emailing prokopec.
There is plenty of work left to do but paulp must get back to other 2.9
issues. This is the Zurich->SF airplane patch. No review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An overhaul of slice and related implementations (primarily that is
drop and take.) In the course of trying to get it working consistently
(mostly with respect to negative indices, which were dealt with
arbitrarily differently across the 25+ concrete implementations) I fixed
various bugs.
Closes #4288, no review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The initial implementation of TraversableOnce could not supply concrete
methods or even signatures for map and flatMap because they have
different signatures in Iterator and TraversableLike. But we can take
another approach which works out as nicely:
1) Create implicits which install those methods and flatten on
TraversableOnce instances. 2) Generalize the signatures of flatten
and flatMap to work with A => TraversableOnce[B] instead of A =>
Traversable[B].
And voila, you can mix and match Iterators and Traversables in a for
comprehension, map, flatMap, and flatten, without the tedious process
of sprinkling .iterator or .toList around to appease the compiler. No
review.
|
| |
|
