| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup to the previous commit that added the compiler support
for opting out of bounds checking.
With both pieces, we can test that the temporaries introduced
by the named/default arguments transform don't trigger bounds
violations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Synthetic defs introduced by transforms like named/default arguments,
ANF (in scala-async) often introduce a type tree (the tpt of the temporary)
that are based on the types of expressions. These types are scrutinized in
RefChecks to check that type parameter bounds are satisfied.
However, the type of the expression might be based on slack a LUB that
fails to capture constraints between type parameters.
This slackness is noted in `mergePrefixAndArgs`:
// Martin: I removed this, because incomplete. Not sure there is a
// good way to fix it. For the moment we just err on the conservative
// side, i.e. with a bound that is too high.
The synthesizer can now opt out of bounds by annotating the type as follows:
val temp: (<expr.tpe> @uncheckedBounds) = expr
This facility is now used in named/default arguments for the temporaries
used for the reciever and arguments.
The annotation is hidden under scala.reflect.internal, rather than in
the more prominent scala.annotation.unchecked, to reflect the intention
that it should only be used in tree transformers.
The library component of this change and test case will be included in the
next commit. Why split like this? It shows that the 2.10.3 compiler will
work with 2.10.2 scala-reflect.jar.
|
|\
| |
| | |
SI-7733 reflective packages now more consistent with scalac
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously PackageScopes from scala.reflect ignored all classes that
had $'s in non-rightmost positions in their names.
Unfortunately this behaviour is inconsistent with how scalac does things,
and I reconciled this as usual, by pulling corresponding logic into
scala-reflect.jar and sharing it between runtime reflection and compiler.
This change has seprate pull requests for 2.10.x and 2.11.0. The latter
deprecates `scala.tools.nsc.util.ClassPath.isTraitImplementation`
whereas the former (which you're looking at right now) does not, because
we can't deprecated members in minor releases.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
showRaw now prints symbols of def trees
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
A very useful addition that came in handy when hacking macro annotations
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This commit gets rid off code wrapping that was previously used by
toolbox to get into correct parsing mode. Instead combination of
templateStats/accept(EOF) is used. This is the same solution as the one
used in repl and built-in scriptRunner
This pull request doesn't attempt to generalize this approach in any
way and re-use it all over the place due to the caution of possible
accidental compatibility breakage. I plan to do it separately against
master.
Additionally there are a few more changes that make importers be aware
of positions and a test for that (via @jedesah).
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there are still discrepancies between how the vanilla compiler
turns class files into symbols and how the reflective compiler does it.
Working on bringing these guys in sync, one bug at a time.
|
|\
| |
| | |
SI-7617 typedAssign no longer expands lhs
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-7558 Fix capture of free local vars in toolbox compiler
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It was creating an `ObjectRef[<notype>]` because of a small
bug in `capturedVariableType`.
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
SI-7556 Fix runtime reflection involving ScalaLongSignature
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Scala type information is stored in classfiles in encoded in a String
in the ScalaSignature annotation. When it is too big for a single
String, it is split into an array of Strings in a different annotation,
ScalaLongSignature.
The enclosed test, with a class containing 3000 methods, uses the latter.
It exposes a bug in the way runtime reflection decodes that data.
It must concatentate and *then* decode, rather that the other way around.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the following code:
trait Cake extends Slice
trait Slice { self: Cake => // must have self type that extends `Slice`
private[this] val bippy = () // must be private[this]
locally(bippy)
}
`ThisType(<Slice>)`.findMember(bippy)` excluded the private local member on
the grounds that the first class in the base type sequence, `Cake`, was
not contained in `Slice`.
scala> val thisType = typeOf[Slice].typeSymbol.thisType
thisType: $r.intp.global.Type = Slice.this.type
scala> thisType.baseClasses
res6: List[$r.intp.global.Symbol] = List(trait Cake, trait Slice, class Object, class Any)
This commit changes `findMember` to use the symbol of the `ThisType`, rather
than the first base class, as the location of the selection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`getClass` is special cased in the compiler; this is described
in in the comments on `Definitions.Any_getClass`.
Part of this happens in `Typer#stabilize`. This was trying to determine
if an Ident or Select node was a call to `getClass` by merits of the name
of the tree's symbol and by checking that the its type (if it was a
MethodType or PolyType) had no parameters in the primary parameter list.
Overloaded user defined `getClass` methods confused this check. In the
enclosed test case, the tree `definitions.this.getClass` had an
`OverloadedType`, and such types always report an empty list of `params`.
This commit:
- changes `stabilize` to use `isGetClass`, rather than the
homebrew check
- changes `isGetClass` to consider a `Set[Symbol]` containing all
`getClass` variants. This moves some similar code from `Erasure`
to `Definitions`
- keeps a fast negative path in `isGetClass` based on the symbol's name
|
|\
| |
| | |
[backport #1727] SI-7359 cyclic nested java class
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The original commit message (from 54a84a36d5):
SI-6548 reflection correctly enters jinners
When completing Java classes, runtime reflection enumerates their
fields, methods, constructors and inner classes, loads them and
enters them into either the instance part (ClassSymbol) or the
static part (ModuleSymbol).
However unlike fields, methods and constructors, inner classes don't
need to be entered explicitly - they are entered implicitly when
being loaded.
This patch fixes the double-enter problem, make sure that enter-on-load
uses the correct owner, and also hardens jclassAsScala against double
enters that can occur in a different scenario.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The optimizer behaves unexpectedly smartly, stripping off unused private
methods. Unfortunately, sometimes private methods might be compiled down
to public Java methods, so stripping them off might lead to binary
incompatibilities.
This particular commit recovers from this problem caused by
https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/5e715396af.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
SI-7464 allows FieldMirror.set to update vals
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There's no reason to leave such sentinels in place inside a facility
designed to circumvent usual restrictions of static types / visibility.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
makes sense of implicit macros!
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Imagine a macro writer which wants to synthesize a complex implicit
Complex[T] by making recursive calls to Complex[U] for its parts.
E.g. if we have `class Foo(val bar: Bar)` and `class Bar(val x: Int)`,
then it's quite reasonable for the macro writer to synthesize
Complex[Foo] by calling `inferImplicitValue(typeOf[Complex[Bar])`.
However if we didn't insert `info.sym.isMacro` check in `typedImplicit`,
then under some circumstances (e.g. as described in http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/545462b377b0ac0a)
`dominates` might decide that `Bar` dominates `Foo` and therefore a
recursive implicit search should be prohibited.
Now when we yield control of divergent expansions to the macro writer,
what happens next? In the worst case, if the macro writer is careless,
we'll get a StackOverflowException from repeated macro calls. Otherwise,
the macro writer could check `c.openMacros` and `c.openImplicits` and
do `c.abort` when expansions are deemed to be divergent. Upon receiving
`c.abort` the typechecker will decide that the corresponding implicit
search has failed which will fail the entire stack of implicit searches,
producing a nice error message provided by the macro writer.
NOTE: the original commit from macro paradise also introduced a new
class, which encapsulates information about implicits in flight.
Unfortunately we cannot do that in 2.10.x, because of binary compatibility
concerns, therefore I'm marking this commit as [nomaster] and will be
resubmitting its full version in a separate pull request exclusively
targetting master.
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| | |
some fixes for macros: one esoteric, and one quite critical
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It's not like we're achieving any generality by iterating through all
keys in System.getProperties and looking for ones which resemble
"boot.class.path", so let's be simpler.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Due to SI-7465 we were erroneously assuming that System.getProperties
only contains string key and string values. This led to a CCE when there
was something else.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-7398 Add support for java8 default methods
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In classfile parser: mark symbols which represent interface
methods yet have code attributes with new flag DEFAULTMETHOD.
These must be kept distinct from regular method bodies so that
an error can be issued when a regular concrete method is
overridden without the override keyword, but not when the
overridden method is a default.
In java source parser: mark Modifiers of interface default
methods with DEFAULTMETHOD flag.
Writing the test was everything I dreamed, and more! However,
% test/partest --debug test/files/run/t7398.scala
Skipping java8-specific test under java version 1.7.0_21
testing: [...]/files/run/t7398.scala [ OK ]
All of 1 tests were successful (elapsed time: 00:00:04)
% test/partest --debug test/files/run/t7398.scala
Attempting java8-specific test under java version 1.8.0-ea
testing: [...]/files/run/t7398.scala [ OK ]
All of 1 tests were successful (elapsed time: 00:00:13)
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See comments in code for the exhaustive list of the cases handled.
Also note that treatment of non-formatting percents has been changed.
Embedding literal %'s now requires escaping.
Moreover, this commit also features exact error positions for string
interpolation, something that has been impossible until the fix for
SI-7271, also included in this patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 692372ce, we added a warning (under -Xlint) when binding
a `TupleN` in to a single pattern binder, which wasn't allowed
before 2.10.0, and more often than not represents a bug.
However, that warning overstretched, and warned even when
using a Tuple Pattern to bind to the elements of such a value.
This commit checks for this case, and avoids the spurious warnings.
A new test case is added for this case to go with the existing
test for SI-6675:
$ ./tools/partest-ack 6675
% tests-with-matching-paths ... 3
% tests-with-matching-code ... 2
# 3 tests to run.
test/partest --show-diff --show-log \
test/files/neg/t6675-old-patmat.scala \
test/files/neg/t6675.scala \
test/files/pos/t6675.scala \
""
Testing individual files
testing: [...]/files/pos/t6675.scala [ OK ]
Testing individual files
testing: [...]/files/neg/t6675-old-patmat.scala [ OK ]
testing: [...]/files/neg/t6675.scala [ OK ]
All of 3 tests were successful (elapsed time: 00:00:03)
|
|\
| |
| | |
Revert "SI-6387 Clones accessor before name expansion"
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 4e10b2c833fa846c68b81e94a08d867e7de656aa.
Add 6387 test to pending and 7341 to up-to-date.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-7289 Less strict type application for TypeVar.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When a type constructor variable is applied to the wrong number of arguments,
return a new type variable whose instance is `ErrorType`.
Dissection of the reported test case by @retronym:
Define the first implicit:
scala> trait Schtroumpf[T]
defined trait Schtroumpf
scala> implicit def schtroumpf[T, U <: Coll[T], Coll[X] <: Traversable[X]]
| (implicit minorSchtroumpf: Schtroumpf[T]): Schtroumpf[U] = ???
schtroumpf: [T, U <: Coll[T], Coll[X] <: Traversable[X]](implicit minorSchtroumpf: Schtroumpf[T])Schtroumpf[U]
Call it explicitly => kind error during type inference reported.
scala> schtroumpf(null): Schtroumpf[Int]
<console>:10: error: inferred kinds of the type arguments (Nothing,Int,Int) do not conform to the expected kinds of the type parameters (type T,type U,type Coll).
Int's type parameters do not match type Coll's expected parameters:
class Int has no type parameters, but type Coll has one
schtroumpf(null): Schtroumpf[Int]
^
<console>:10: error: type mismatch;
found : Schtroumpf[U]
required: Schtroumpf[Int]
schtroumpf(null): Schtroumpf[Int]
^
Add another implicit, and let implicit search weigh them up.
scala> implicitly[Schtroumpf[Int]]
<console>:10: error: diverging implicit expansion for type Schtroumpf[Int]
starting with method schtroumpf
implicitly[Schtroumpf[Int]]
^
scala> implicit val qoo = new Schtroumpf[Int]{}
qoo: Schtroumpf[Int] = $anon$1@c1b9b03
scala> implicitly[Schtroumpf[Int]]
<crash>
Implicit search compares the two in-scope implicits in `isStrictlyMoreSpecific`,
which constructs an existential type:
type ET = Schtroumpf[U] forSome { type T; type U <: Coll[T]; type Coll[_] <: Traversable[_] }
A subsequent subtype check `ET <:< Schtroumpf[Int]` gets to `withTypeVars`, which
replaces the quantified types with type variables, checks conformance of that
substitued underlying type against `Schtroumpf[Int]`, and then tries to solve
the collected type constraints. The type var trace looks like:
[ create] ?T ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ create] ?U ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ create] ?Coll ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ setInst] Nothing ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], T=Nothing )
[ setInst] scala.collection.immutable.Nil.type( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], U=scala.collection.immutable.Nil.type )
[ setInst] =?scala.collection.immutable.Nil.type( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], Coll==?scala.collection.immutable.Nil.type )
[ create] ?T ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ setInst] Int ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], T=Int )
[ create] ?T ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ create] ?U ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ create] ?Coll ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]] )
[ setInst] Nothing ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], T=Nothing )
[ setInst] Int ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], U=Int )
[ setInst] =?Int ( In Test#schtroumpf[T,U <: Coll[T],Coll[_] <: Traversable[_]], Coll==?Int )
The problematic part is when `?Int` (the type var originated from `U`) is registered
as a lower bound for `Coll`. That happens in `solveOne`:
for (tparam2 <- tparams)
tparam2.info.bounds.hi.dealias match {
case TypeRef(_, `tparam`, _) =>
log(s"$tvar addLoBound $tparam2.tpeHK.instantiateTypeParams($tparams, $tvars)")
tvar addLoBound tparam2.tpeHK.instantiateTypeParams(tparams, tvars)
case _ =>
}
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
SI-6937 core type tags are no longer referentially unique
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Type tag factory used to evaluate the provided type creator in the
context of the initial mirror in order to maintain referential equality
of instances of standard tags. Unfortunately this evaluation might fail
if the mirror provided doesn't contain the classes being referred to.
Therefore I think we should avoid evaluating type creators there.
Note that failure of evaluation doesn't mean that there's something
bad going on. When one creates a type tag, the correct mirror /
classloader to interpret that tag in might be unknown (like it happens
here). This is okay, and this is exactly what the 2.10.0-M4 refactoring
has addressed.
Something like `res2.typeTag[A].in(currentMirror)` should be okay.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Now, the InfoTransformer is responsible for erasing the
path dependent types of formal parameters, at the same
place where it flattens nested method types.
This is preferable to having the tree transformer overwrite
the result of the info transformer, as used to be the case
after my previous work on SI-6135 / 493197fc.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
For imminent reuse in the subsequent commit.
The binary compatibility whitelist is updated to
ignore these, as they live in reflect.internal.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
Because this implementation is more clear than 2.10.x's and it will
simplify a further commit to fix SI-6715.
|
|\
| |
| | |
SI-7285 Fix match analysis with nested objects
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The fix for SI-6146 introduced `nestedMemberType` to
enumerate sealed subtypes based on the (prefixed) type
of the scrutinee and the symbols of its sealed subclasses.
That method needed to widen `ThisType(modSym)`s to
`ModuleTypeRef(modSym)` before calling `asSeenFrom`.
However, this could lead to confused in the match analysis,
which sees `ModuleTypeRef` as distinct from singleton types
on the same modules (after all, they aren't =:=). Spurious
warnings ensued.
This commit makes two changes:
- conditionally re-narrow the result of `asSeenFrom` in `nestedMemberType`.
- present `a.b.SomeModule.type` as `SomeModule` in warnings emitted
by the pattern matcher.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-6387 Clones accessor before name expansion
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
When a symbol's name is expanded due to a conflict during
composition (e.g. multiple traits with same-named members, but
which are not both visible at the language level in the concrete
class) the compiler renames some symbols with expanded names which
embed the full name of the declaring class to avoid clashes.
In the rare cases when the accessor overrides the member in base
class, such expansion either results in AbstractMethodError when
the base method is abstract, or, even worse, can change the
semantics of the program.
To avoid such issues, we clone the accessor symbol, clear its
ACCESSOR flag and enter the symbol with an unchanged name.
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| | |
Read version 51 (JDK 7) class files.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This commit makes the ClassFileReader/ICodeReader parse class files
from JDK 7 (class file version 51). It does that by skipping over
the method handle related entries in the constant pool and by doing
some dummy processing on invoke dynamic instructions. The inliner
is updated to not try to inline a method with an invoke dynamic
instruction. A place holder INVOKE_DYNAMIC instruction is added to ICode
but it is designed to create an error if there's ever any attempt to
analyze it. Because the inliner is the only phase that ever tries
to analyze ICode instructions not generated from Scala source and
because Scala source will never emit an INVOKE_DYNAMIC, the place
holder INVOKE_DYNAMIC should never cause any errors.
A test is included that generates a class file with INVOKE_DYNAMIC
and then compiles Scala code that depends on it.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This long-standing, but trivial to fix nuisance in the implementation of
runtime reflection actively avoided being fixed in both 2.10.0 and 2.10.1.
It's finally the time to put it to a rest.
|
|\
| |
| | |
SI-7240 fixes language feature lookup
|