summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Update comment.Jason Zaugg2012-11-131-1/+2
|
* SI-6646 `ident` or Ident is always new binding.Jason Zaugg2012-11-131-25/+59
| | | | | | | | | | | The previous commit regressed in these cases: // no withFilter for (X <- List("A single ident is always a pattern")) println(X) for (`x` <- List("A single ident is always a pattern")) println(`x`) At the top level of the LHS of a <-, such identifiers represent new bindings, not stable identifier patterns.
* SI-6646 Fix regression in for desugaring.Jason Zaugg2012-11-102-19/+28
| | | | | | The early check in the parser of pattern irrefutability, added in c82ecab, failed to consider InitCaps and `backquoted` identifiers.
* Merge pull request #1566 from densh/topic/asSeenFrom-exampleJosh Suereth2012-11-041-4/+20
|\ | | | | Fixes example in Type.asSeenFrom
| * Fixes example in Type.asSeenFromDen Shabalin2012-11-031-4/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | It was written in some form of non-executable pseudo-code before and that might be quite confusing for people who are not familiar with scala reflection.
* | Merge pull request #1559 from heathermiller/copyright-updateJosh Suereth2012-11-041240-1249/+1248
|\ \ | |/ |/| Updated copyright dates throughout compiler and stdlib for upcoming release
| * Brings copyrights in Scaladoc footer and manpage up-to-date, from 2011/12 to ↵Heather Miller2012-11-022-2/+2
| | | | | | | | 2013
| * Brings all copyrights (in comments) up-to-date, from 2011/12 to 2013Heather Miller2012-11-021240-1247/+1246
| |
* | Merge pull request #1562 from paulp/issue/6600Josh Suereth2012-11-022-6/+15
|\ \ | | | | | | Fix for SI-6600, regression with ScalaNumber.
| * | Fix for SI-6600, regression with ScalaNumber.Paul Phillips2012-11-022-6/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not much in the end; I divided ScalaNumericConversions into two traits such that the ScalaNumericAnyConversions can be used in value classes, and ScalaNumericConversions can override methods in ScalaNumber (since one trait cannot do both those things.) The fact that ScalaNumber is privileged for equality but a) extends java.lang.Number and therefore b) cannot be a value class is something we will want to revisit real soon.
* | | SI-6562 Fix crash with class nested in @inline methodJason Zaugg2012-11-023-8/+17
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | e6b4204604 moved access widenings from ExplicitOuter to SuperAccessors to reflect them in pickled signatures so that the inliner can take advantage of them under separate compilation. The followup discussion [1] determined that this wasn't the right solution: while it enabled new separate compilation inlinings, it failed to widen access of outer pointers and hence prevented certain inlinings. A better solution was proposed: modify the inliner to know that access widening is guaranteed to have happened in ExplicitOuter for any field accessed by an @inline-d method body, rather than relying solely on the pickled types. But this hasn't happened yet. In the meantime 07f94297 / #1121 reinstated the access widening to SuperAccessors, but took a slightly different approach, using `Symbol#enclMethod` rather than `closestEnclMethod`. That deviation triggers SI-6562. This commit goes back to `closestEnclMethod`. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/iPkMCygzws4
* | SI-6606 Drops new icons in, replaces abstract types placeholder iconsHeather Miller2012-11-024-0/+0
| |
* | SI-6132 Revisited, cleaned-up, links fixed, spelling errors fixed, rewordingsHeather Miller2012-11-0226-194/+227
| |
* | Labeling scala.reflect and scala.reflect.macros experimental in the API docsHeather Miller2012-11-0238-56/+184
| | | | | | | | | | - Added the labels across scala.reflect and scala.reflect.macros - Added the styling in template.css that is used by all labels
* | Typo-fix in scala.concurrent.Future, thanks to @pavelpavlovHeather Miller2012-11-021-1/+1
| |
* | Remove implementation details from Position (they are still under ↵Hubert Plociniczak2012-11-021-29/+2
| | | | | | | | reflection.internal). It probably needs more cleanup of the api wrt to ranges etc but let's leave it for later
* | SI-6399 Adds API docs for Any and AnyValHeather Miller2012-11-022-5/+51
|/ | | | | - Updates AnyVal docs to address value classes. - Updates Any docs to address universal traits.
* Merge pull request #1526 from paulp/value-classes/6534-equalsAdriaan Moors2012-11-011-1/+18
|\ | | | | New take on SI-6534, value classes.
| * Modification to SI-6534 patch.Paul Phillips2012-10-301-9/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | Only exclude hashCode and equals from being overridden in value classes, not other synthetics which may turn up such as case class methods.
| * New take on SI-6534, value classes.Paul Phillips2012-10-241-1/+16
| | | | | | | | | | Don't prohibit equals and hashCode in universal traits; instead, always override them in value classes.
* | Merge pull request #1540 from odersky/ticket/6500Adriaan Moors2012-11-011-2/+4
|\ \ | | | | | | Fixes SI-6500 by making erasure more regular.
| * | Fixes SI-6500 by making erasure more regular.Martin Odersky2012-10-301-2/+4
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | With the introduction of value classes, erasure uses specialErasure where a value class C with underlying type T is unboxed to an ErasedValueType. ErasedValue types are eliminated on phase later, in post-erasure. This was done everywhere, except in the parameter types of bridge methods. That was a mistale, because that way bridge methods could not do the boxing/unboxing logic triggered by ErasedValueTypes. Note: there is one remaining use of erasure (not specialErasure) in Erasure.scala. I put in a comment why that is OK.
* | Merge pull request #1542 from adriaanm/odersky-ticket/6556v2Adriaan Moors2012-11-011-1/+13
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6556 no assert for surprising ctor result type
| * | SI-6556 no assert for surprising ctor result typeMartin Odersky2012-10-301-1/+13
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | Previous fix to value classes uncovered some questionable cases in the backend where result types of constructor signatures are surprising. It's not a big deal because these types will be ignored afterwards anyway. But the method uncovered some questionable situations which we should follow up on. However, breaking 2.9 code because of this is way too harsh. That's why the asserts were converted to warnings. review by @paulp, @adriaanm
* | Removing actors-migration from main repository so it can live on elsewhere.Josh Suereth2012-11-011-74/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Removes actors-migration hooks from partest * Removes actors-migration code * removes actors-migration tests * removes actors-migration distribution packaging.
* | Merge branch '2.10.0-wip' of github.com:scala/scala into 2.10.0-wipJosh Suereth2012-11-0110-35/+77
|\ \
| * \ Merge pull request #1543 from adriaanm/paulp-add-synthetics-onceJosh Suereth2012-10-311-6/+25
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | SI-6578 Harden against synthetics being added more than once.
| | * | SI-6578 Harden against synthetics being added more than once.Paul Phillips2012-10-301-6/+25
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't add synthetic methods if they already contain synthetic methods from the set we're about to add.
| * | Merge pull request #1536 from vjovanov/issues/SI-6581Josh Suereth2012-10-312-6/+6
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | SI-6581 fixed by inlining `Actor.self`.
| | * | SI-6581 fixed by inlining `Actor.self`.Vojin Jovanovic2012-10-302-6/+6
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This avoids the necessary type cast that was preventing leakage of internal migration classes. Review by @phaller
| * | Merge pull request #1532 from hubertp/2.10.0-wip-issue/5031Josh Suereth2012-10-312-3/+7
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | Fixes SI-5031 for separate compilation scenario.
| | * | Fixes SI-5031 for separate compilation scenario.Hubert Plociniczak2012-10-282-3/+7
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When you have a conflicting member in package object and normal package that share the same namespace we remove the latter ClassSymbol from the scope. Now, this has an unpleasant consequence that companionClass/companionModule/companionSymbol no longer work correctly as they rely on finding the correspondent symbol using decls of the owner. This fixes the problem of SI-5031 for separate compilation. Why the above change matters for finding foo.bar.Foo? Because when parsing the class we needed information about the static module (and we have the correct module symbol when completing the info). It's just that 043ce6d0565c9d5d960 relied on no longer valid assumptions. So we were getting NoSymbol and sym.exist was failing. Obviously a more complete solution would be better if we didn't rely on the scope but that's too big to change for 2.10.0.
| * | Use Typed rather than .setTypeJason Zaugg2012-10-291-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | In response to pull request feedback.
| * | Wider use and a new variant of typedPos.Jason Zaugg2012-10-285-21/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's safe to replace `localTyper.typed(atPos(pos)(tree))` with `localTyper.typedPos(pos)(tree)` given that we're all in the same cake and we'll get to the same `atPos`.
| * | SI-6575 Plug inference leak of AbstractPartialFunJason Zaugg2012-10-281-1/+9
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usually this isn't needed, as partial functions can only be defined with an expected type. But if that expected type is and inherited method return type, the actual type of the partial function literal is used, and the implementation detail of `AbstractPartialFunction[A, B] with Serializable` leaks out. After this change, the inferred types match those from Scala 2.9.2. ticket/6575 ~/code/scala scalac29 -Xprint:typer test/files/pos/t6575a.scala | grep def > 29.txt ticket/6575 ~/code/scala squalac -Xprint:typer test/files/pos/t6575a.scala | grep def > 210.txt ticket/6575 ~/code/scala diff -u 29.txt 210.txt --- 29.txt 2012-10-28 13:51:07.000000000 +0100 +++ 210.txt 2012-10-28 13:51:20.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,16 @@ def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] def /*Y*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$1: Int) => x0$1 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match { def /*Z*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$2: Int) => x0$2 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match { def /*Comb*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$3: Int) => x0$3 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match {
* / Removing actors-migration from main repository so it can live on elsewhere.Josh Suereth2012-10-3016-501/+3
|/ | | | | | | * Removes actors-migration hooks from partest * Removes actors-migration code * removes actors-migration tests * removes actors-migration distribution packaging.
* Merge pull request #1519 from paulp/no-product-nJosh Suereth2012-10-241-3/+4
|\ | | | | Disabled generation of _1, _2, etc. methods.
| * Disabled generation of _1, _2, etc. methods.Paul Phillips2012-10-221-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was part of the introduction of ProductN, which had to go back into pandora's box because of issues with cycles during typing. These should have been reverted along with it.
* | Merge pull request #1507 from retronym/ticket/6526Josh Suereth2012-10-241-3/+5
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6526 Tail call elimination should descend deeper.
| * | SI-6526 Tail call elimination should descend deeper.Jason Zaugg2012-10-171-3/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It wasn't traversing into Select nodes nor into the receiver of a tail call.
* | | Fix SI-6552, regression with self types.Paul Phillips2012-10-212-3/+6
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In 6eb55d4b7a we put in a remedy for an old issue SI-4560 which had accumulated a number of sketchy partial remedies which carried no tests to illustrate their necessity. Looks like at least one of those was doing something useful. Here's to reversion-reversion. This reverts commit c8bdf199, which itself reverted cb4fd6582.
* | Merge pull request #1509 from paulp/issue/6537Josh Suereth2012-10-201-34/+33
|\ \ | | | | | | Fix for SI-6537, inaccurate unchecked warning.
| * | Fix for SI-6537, inaccurate unchecked warning.Paul Phillips2012-10-181-34/+33
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I found a more direct expression of the unchecked logic, which should be much easier for others to verify. But the bug being fixed here is that the unchecked checking happens too early, and the sealed children of a symbol are not yet visible if it is being simultaneously compiled.
* | Merge pull request #1480 from ingoem/topic/scaladocAdriaan Moors2012-10-192-563/+9
|\ \ | | | | | | Fixes SI-6170: issue with dragging scaladoc splitter over central iframe
| * | Fixes SI-6170: issue with dragging scaladoc splitter over central iframeingoem2012-10-092-563/+9
| | |
* | | Changes Tree and Type members from vals to defs.Paul Phillips2012-10-132-115/+115
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Explanatory email: The reflection API defines a great many abstract vals. I would like these all to be defs. I'm sending a pull request to that end. Reasons: for starters, they should default to being defs. It's a decision to use vals for which one should have to supply reasons. The reason for THAT is that defs can be implemented with vals, but not vice versa. Why does this matter? I can't find my long writing on the subject of TypeRef. In short, we waste a huge amount of memory on its fields, because given the way TypeRef is defined, each one demands a pre, a sym, and an args. Except that somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 have prefix "NoPrefix", and somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 have args "Nil". We know it at creation time, but we give every typeref the whole field anyway. At present there's no way to fix this which has acceptable performance - i.e. custom subclasses save us lots of memory, but are too much slower for having to use an extractor - but there's no reason we should have to choose, and I fully expect to fix it eventually. Let's not make that fix into a breaking change by abstractly defining "pre" and "args" as field-requiring vals.
* | Merge pull request #1492 from scalamacros/pullrequest/reflection-docsv2.10.0-RC1Josh Suereth2012-10-1145-786/+3943
|\ \ | | | | | | Pullrequest/reflection docs
| * | JavaUniverseVlad Ureche2012-10-111-2/+1
| | |
| * | Moved @contentDiagram in SymbolsVlad Ureche2012-10-111-2/+2
| | |
| * | Adds lots of new documentation for TypeTags, Mirrors, Universes and moreHeather Miller2012-10-1120-352/+646
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additionally includes improvements, formatting fixes, and link additions and fixes.
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-07-16 18:40:49 +0000