| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"According to the spec this code should not be legal. Disabling for
now." Need to come back and either make it work or (more likely) make
nsc reject the test)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like we will need blood, toil, tears, and sweat. No review.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handling Freevars in Importers and discovering whole new classes of
errors in Liftcode.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Started work on compiler toolbox that can compile reflect trees at
runtime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Changes to Liftcode to use new reflection semantics, where a compiler
uses type checking.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disabled all the old scala.reflect._ tests which are now crash-failing,
no review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Compilation of spec-List enters an infinite loop under -optimise,
disabling in the hopes of seeing a new build before I die. I'll put it
back. No review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re-enabled test spec-traits (removed the swing dependent part, since all
it tested was call-by-name parameters). no review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
compile because the specialized variants of apply were not implemented
as well. Fixed by extending runtime.AbstractFunction0 instead.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
according to my tests, they all currently work.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
changes necessary to plug it back in while preserving everything which
has happened since then in tests and such, but we should be the lookout
for overreversion. Review by phaller (but as a formality, I don't think
it requires direct review.)
|
|
Moved some test cases from pending to files since the bugs they were
watching for seem to be fixed. Moved some other test cases from pending
to disabled because they deceptively claim to pass while investigation
reveals the ticket needs to remain open. Closes #1996, #2660.
|