| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Until now lazy accessors were handled somehow special because their symbol was created in typers but the corresponding tree was only added in Refchecks. This irregularity caused serious problems for value classes. Also it now looks just better when lazy value is treated in a similar way as other fields.
I needed to adapt reifier so that it handles the new implementation correctly. Previously it had to recreate lazy val only by removing defdef and renaming. Now we basically need to recreate lazy val from scratch.
There is one minor change to cps plugin but that is still fine because lazy vals were never really part of the transformation.
Some range positions needed to be fixed manually. We could do it at the creation time but that would require a lot more "if (symbol.isLazy)" conditions for MethodSyntheis and Symbol/Tree creation and would just unnecessary complicate api. If someone has a better idea, please speak up. Range positions changes were necessary because previously accessors were created at refchecks and they weren't checked by validator (even though they were wrong).
This commit removes lazy val implementation restriction introduced for 2.10.0.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I wrote a warning when nullary methods return Unit. I wimped out of
including it in this patch because we had about 200 of them, and that's
what is fixed in this patch. I will add the warning to some kind of
"-Xlint" feature after 2.9.
This is motivated at least partly by the resolution of #4506, which
indicates the distinction between "def foo()" and "def foo" will
continue to jab its pointy stick into our eyes, so I believe we have a
minimal duty of at least following our own advice about what they mean
and not making a semirandom choice as to whether a method has parens or
not. Review by community.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
changes necessary to plug it back in while preserving everything which
has happened since then in tests and such, but we should be the lookout
for overreversion. Review by phaller (but as a formality, I don't think
it requires direct review.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If I work on this patch any longer without checking in I will go
stark raving mad. It is broken up into a couple pieces. This one is
the changes to test/. It includes fixing a bunch of tests, removing
deprecated constructs, moving jars used by tests to the most specific
plausible location rather than having all jars on the classpath of all
tests, and some filesystem layout change (continuations get their whole
own srcpath.) This would be the world's most tedious review, so let's
say no review.
[Note: after this commit, I doubt things will build very smoothly until
the rest of the partest changes follow. Which should only be seconds,
but just in case.]
|
| |
|
