summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/continuations-neg/lazy.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Cull extraneous whitespace.Paul Phillips2013-09-181-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace. Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript code on the way in. Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40 lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files. It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
* Begone t1737...Hubert Plociniczak2011-11-021-7/+7
|
* I wrote a warning when nullary methods return U...Paul Phillips2011-04-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I wrote a warning when nullary methods return Unit. I wimped out of including it in this patch because we had about 200 of them, and that's what is fixed in this patch. I will add the warning to some kind of "-Xlint" feature after 2.9. This is motivated at least partly by the resolution of #4506, which indicates the distinction between "def foo()" and "def foo" will continue to jab its pointy stick into our eyes, so I believe we have a minimal duty of at least following our own advice about what they mean and not making a semirandom choice as to whether a method has parens or not. Review by community.
* Rolled partest back to r21328.Paul Phillips2010-05-061-0/+16
| | | | | | | | changes necessary to plug it back in while preserving everything which has happened since then in tests and such, but we should be the lookout for overreversion. Review by phaller (but as a formality, I don't think it requires direct review.)
* If I work on this patch any longer without chec...Paul Phillips2010-04-051-16/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If I work on this patch any longer without checking in I will go stark raving mad. It is broken up into a couple pieces. This one is the changes to test/. It includes fixing a bunch of tests, removing deprecated constructs, moving jars used by tests to the most specific plausible location rather than having all jars on the classpath of all tests, and some filesystem layout change (continuations get their whole own srcpath.) This would be the world's most tedious review, so let's say no review. [Note: after this commit, I doubt things will build very smoothly until the rest of the partest changes follow. Which should only be seconds, but just in case.]
* closes 2864.Tiark Rompf2010-03-291-0/+16