| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Members of value classes are moved over to the companion object early.
This change ensures that closure classes nested in value classes
appear that way to Java reflection.
This commit also changes the EnclosingMethod attribute for classes
(and anonymous functions) nested in anonymous function bodies. Before,
the enclosing method was in some cases the function's apply method.
Not always though:
() => { class C ... val a = { class D ...} }
The class C used to be nested in the function's apply method, but not
D, because the value definition for a was lifted out of the apply.
After this commit, we uniformly set the enclosing method of classes
nested in function bodies to `null`. This is consistent with the
source-level view of the code.
Note that under delambdafy:method, closures never appear as enclosing
classes (this didn't change in this commit).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Trait implementation classes and specialized classes are always
considered top-level in terms of the InnerClass / EnclosingMethod
attributes. These attributes describe source-level properties, and
such classes are a compilation artifact.
Note that the same is true for delambdafy:method closure classes
(they are always top-level).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Private trait methods are not added to the generated interface, they
end up only in the implementation class. For classes nested in such
methods, the EnclosingMethod attribute was incorrect.
Since the EnclosingMethod attribute expresses a source-level property,
but the actual enclosing method does not exist in the bytecode, we
set the enclosing method to null.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change fixes both GenASM and GenBCode, except for the change
to renaming in LamdaLift mentioned below.
The reason for an inconsistent EnclosingMethod attribute was the
symbol owner chain. Initially, closure class symbols don't exist, they
are only created in UnCurry (delambdafy:inline). So walking the
originalOwner of a definition does not yield closure classes.
The commit also fixes uses of isAnonymousClass, isAnonymousFunction
and isDelambdafyFunction in two ways:
1. by phase-travelling to an early phase. after flatten, the name
includes the name of outer classes, so the properties may become
accidentally true (they check for a substring in the name)
2. by ensuring that the (destructive) renames during LambdaLift
don't make the above properties accidentally true. This was in
fact the cause for SI-8900.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This infrastructure is required for the inliner: when inlining code
from a classfile, the corresponding ClassBType is needed for various
things (eg access checks, InnerClass attribute).
The test creates two ClassBTypes for the same class: once using the
(unpickled) Symbol, once using the parsed ASM ClassNode, and verifies
that the two are the same.
There's a cleanup to the InnerClass attribute:
object T { class Member; def foo = { class Local } }
class T
For Java compatibility the InnerClass entry for Member says the class
is nested in T (not in the module class T$). We now make sure to add
that entry only to T, not to T$ (unless Member is actually referenced
in the classfile T$, in that case it will be added, as required).
|
| |
|
|
| |
This should have been done in 63207e1
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit seems bigger than it is. Most of it is tests, and moving
some code around. The actual changes are small, but a bit subtle.
The InnerClass and EnclosingMethod attributes should now be close to
the JVM spec (which is summarized in BTypes.scala). New tests make
sure that changes to these attributes, and changes to the way Java
reflection sees Scala classfiles, don't go unnoticed.
A new file, BCodeAsmCommon, holds code that's shared between the two
backend (it could hold more, future work).
In general, the difficulty with emitting InnerClass / EnclosingMethod
is that we need to find out source-level properties. We need to make
sure to do enough phase-travelling, and work around destructive
changes to the ownerchain in lambdalift (we use originalOwner a lot).
The change to JavaMirrors is prompted by the change to the
EnclosingMethod attribute, which changes Java reflection's answer to
getEnclosingMethod and getEnclosingConstructor. Classes defined in
field initializers no longer have an enclosing method, just an
enclosing class, which broke an assumption in JavaMirrors.
There's one change in erasure. Before this change, when an object
declaration implements / overrides a method, and a bridge is required,
then the bridge method was actually a ModuleSymbol (it would get the
lateMETHOD flag and be emitted as a method anyway). This is confusing,
when iterating through the members of a class, you can find two
modules with the same name, and one of them doesn't have a module
class. Now, such bridge methods will be MethodSymbols.
Removed Symbol.originalEnclosingMethod, that is a backend thing and
doesn't need to live in the symbol API.
|
|
|
Some parts of the test assert (current) buggy behavior. This is marked
in the test file with TODO. It will be fixed in later work on the
backend.
|
