summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/jvm/t8689.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* SI-8689 Make a Future test case determisticJason Zaugg2015-03-311-2/+7
| | | | | | | | | As discussed: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/m8I_3GQR4vQ We need to ensure a happens-before relationship between the callback that prints "success" and the end of the main method.
* SI-8689 Avoid internal error in Promise after sequence of completionsViktor Klang2015-02-041-0/+13
Calling `completeWith` when the `DefaultPromise` is already completed, leads to callbacks not being properly executed. This happened because `Future.InternalCallbackExecutor` extends `BatchingExecutor`[1] which assumes `unbatchedExecute` to be async, when in this case it is sync, and if there is an exception thrown by executing the batch, it creates a new batch with the remaining items from the current batch and submits that to `unbatchedExecute` and then rethrows, but if you have a sync `unbatchedExecute`, it will fail since it is not reentrant, as witnessed by the failed `require` as reported in this issue. This commit avoids problem by delegating `completeWith` to `tryComplete`, which has the effect of using `onComplete` + `tryComplete` i.s.o. `complete`, which means that when it fails (because of a benign race condition between completers) it won't throw an exception. It has been tested by the minimized reproducer. [1] Actually, in the 2.10.x branch where this patch is starting out, "The BatchingExecutor trait had to be inlined into InternalCallbackExecutor for binary compatibility.". This comment will be more literally correct in the context of 2.11.x and beyond