|
|
Firstly, for `((a, b) => c): (Tuple2[A, B] => C)`, we currently
just offer "missing parameter type." Is something of a rite of
passage to know that you need `{ case (...)}`
This commit stops short DWIM, but does offer a diagnostic to guide
the user towards the supported way of destructuring a `Tuple` in
the sole argument of a `Function1`.
Secondly, another (less common?) way one might try to write a function
to destructure a single tuple argument is:
(((a, b)) => c)
The parser now matches offers a specific error message for this, and
points out the alternatives.
In both cases, we avoid offering syntactically invalid alternatives,
by detecting names that aren't valid as variable-patterns, and
falling back to generic "paramN" in the error message.
A handly utility function to sequence a list of options is liberated
from the pattern matcher for broader use.
|
