| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code
in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I
could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases
which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace.
Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing
space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least
reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript
code on the way in.
Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing
whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof
against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40
lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files.
It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery
on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest
it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Offer warning when demonstrably non-side-effecting expressions appear in
statement position, which should be unintentional by definition. Threw
in removal of six places with useless discarded expressions which the
warning informed me about. No review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I wrote a warning when nullary methods return Unit. I wimped out of
including it in this patch because we had about 200 of them, and that's
what is fixed in this patch. I will add the warning to some kind of
"-Xlint" feature after 2.9.
This is motivated at least partly by the resolution of #4506, which
indicates the distinction between "def foo()" and "def foo" will
continue to jab its pointy stick into our eyes, so I believe we have a
minimal duty of at least following our own advice about what they mean
and not making a semirandom choice as to whether a method has parens or
not. Review by community.
|
| |
|
