| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They remain ValDefs until then.
- remove lazy accessor logic
now that we have a single ValDef for lazy vals,
with the underlying machinery being hidden until the fields phase
leave a `@deprecated def lazyAccessor` for scala-refactoring
- don't skolemize in purely synthetic getters,
but *do* skolemize in lazy accessor during typers
Lazy accessors have arbitrary user code, so have to skolemize.
We exempt the purely synthetic accessors (`isSyntheticAccessor`)
for strict vals, and lazy accessors emitted by the fields phase
to avoid spurious type mismatches due to issues with existentials
(That bug is tracked as https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165)
When we're past typer, lazy accessors are synthetic,
but before they are user-defined to make this hack less hacky,
we could rework our flag usage to allow for
requiring both the ACCESSOR and the SYNTHETIC bits
to identify synthetic accessors and trigger the exemption.
see also https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165
ok 7 - pos/existentials-harmful.scala
ok 8 - pos/t2435.scala
ok 9 - pos/existentials.scala
previous attempt: skolemize type of val inside the private[this] val
because its type is only observed from inside the
accessor methods (inside the method scope its existentials are skolemized)
- bean accessors have regular method types, not nullary method types
- must re-infer type for param accessor
some weirdness with scoping of param accessor vals and defs?
- tailcalls detect lazy vals, which are defdefs after fields
- can inline constant lazy val from trait
- don't mix in fields etc for an overridden lazy val
- need try-lift in lazy vals: the assign is not seen in uncurry
because fields does the transform (see run/t2333.scala)
- ensure field members end up final in bytecode
- implicit class companion method: annot filter in completer
- update check: previous error message was tangled up with unrelated
field definitions (`var s` and `val s_scope`),
now it behaves consistently whether those are val/vars or defs
- analyzer plugin check update seems benign, but no way to know...
- error message gen: there is no underlying symbol for a deferred var
look for missing getter/setter instead
- avoid retypechecking valdefs while duplicating for specialize
see pos/spec-private
- Scaladoc uniformly looks to field/accessor symbol
- test updates to innerClassAttribute by Lukas
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Increase eligibility requirements for implicit conversions,
such that T => U is ineligible if
T <: Null <or> AnyRef <: U
This has the salutary effect of allowing us to ditch 16
ridiculous implicits from Predef, since they existed solely
to work around the absence of this restriction.
There was one tiny impact on actual source code (one line
in one file) shown here, necessitated because the literal null
is not eligible to be implicitly converted to A via <:<.
def f[A](implicit ev: Null <:< A): A = null // before
def f[A](implicit ev: Null <:< A): A = ev(null) // after
As impositions go it's on the tame side.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** Important note for busy commit log skimmers ***
Symbol method "fullName" has been trying to serve the dual role of "how
to print a symbol" and "how to find a class file." It cannot serve both
these roles simultaneously, primarily because of package objects but
other little things as well. Since in the majority of situations we want
the one which corresponds to the idealized scala world, not the grubby
bytecode, I went with that for fullName. When you require the path to a
class (e.g. you are calling Class.forName) you should use javaClassName.
package foo { package object bar { class Bippy } }
If sym is Bippy's symbol, then
sym.fullName == foo.bar.Bippy
sym.javaClassName == foo.bar.package.Bippy
*** End important note ***
There are many situations where we (until now) forewent revealing
everything we knew about a type mismatch. For instance, this isn't very
helpful of scalac (at least in those more common cases where you didn't
define type X on the previous repl line.)
scala> type X = Int
defined type alias X
scala> def f(x: X): Byte = x
<console>:8: error: type mismatch;
found : X
required: Byte
def f(x: X): Byte = x
^
Now it says:
found : X
(which expands to) Int
required: Byte
def f(x: X): Byte = x
^
In addition I rearchitected a number of methods involving:
- finding a symbol's owner
- calculating a symbol's name
- determining whether to print a prefix
No review.
|
| |
|
