| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Performs the following renamings:
* scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Context
* scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Macro
* scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context
* scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Macro
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/MX40-dM28rk
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first commit in the series. This commit only:
1) Splits Context into BlackboxContext and WhiteboxContext
2) Splits Macro into BlackboxMacro and WhiteboxMacro
3) Introduces the isBundle property in the macro impl binding
Here we just teach the compiler that macros can now be blackbox and whitebox,
without actually imposing any restrictions on blackbox macros. These
restrictions will come in subsequent commits.
For description and documentation of the blackbox/whitebox separation
see the official macro guide at the scaladoc website:
http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/macros/blackbox-whitebox.html
Some infrastructure work to make evolving macros easier:
compile partest-extras with quick so they can use latest library/reflect/...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the advent of quasiquotes, we allowed both arguments and return types
of macro impls to be c.Tree's (as opposed to traditional c.Expr[T]'s).
This warrants an update of macro def <-> macro impl signature mismatch
errors that include a printout of suggested macro impl signatures. Now
along with a signature that contains exprs, we suggest another signature
that has all exprs replaced by trees
|
|
|
It looks like checkConforms should wait for error before
using explainTypes, rather than turning on macro debug
trace if explaintypes is set.
In particular, macro debug output is Console.println
instead of reporter.echo or similar, so partest can't
test it.
|
